Contemporary sexism: The Relationships among Hostility, Benevolence, and Neosexism

Psychology of Women Quarterly

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 503-517

  Masser, Barbara ^a   Abrams, Dominic ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033431316     PISSN: 03616843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00378.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Abrams, D. (1989). Differential association: Social developments in gender identity and intergroup relations during adolescence. In S. Skevington & D. Baker (Eds.), The social identity of women. London: Sage.
2. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
3. Beaton, A. M., Tougas, F., & Joly, S. (1996). Neosexism among male managers: Is it a matter of numbers? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 2189-2203.
4. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and support for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
5. Campbell, B., Schellenberg, E. G., & Senn, C. Y. (1997). Evaluating measures of contemporary sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 89-102.
6. Crosby, F., Bromley, S., & Saxe, L. (1980). Recent unobtrusive studies of Black and White discrimination and prejudice: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 546-563.
7. DelBoca, F. K., Ashmore, R. D., & McManus, M. A. (1986). Gender-related attitudes. In R. D. Ashmore & F. K. DelBoca (Eds.), The social psychology of female-male relations. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
8. Ferree, M. M., & Hass, B. B. (1985). Controversy and coalition: The new feminist movement. Boston: Twayne.
9. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination and racism. London: Academic Press.
10. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
11. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes towards women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 119-137.
12. Hacker, H. M. (1951). Women as a minority group. Social Forces, 30, 60-69.
13. Katz, I., & Hass, R. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893-905.
14. Katz, I., Wackenhut, J., & Hass, R. G. (1986). Racial ambivalence, value duality and behaviour. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination and racism. London: Academic Press.
15. Masser, B. M., & Abrams, D. (1997, April). Contemporary sexism in Britain - Can the Neosexism Scale tell us who will discriminate? Paper presented at the British Psychological Society Annual Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland.
16. McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence and the Modern Racism Scale. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination and racism. London: Academic Press.
17. Monteith, M. J. (1993). Self-regulation of prejudiced responses: Implications for progress in prejudice-reduction efforts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 469-485.
18. Myrdal, G. (1944). An American dilemma. New York: Harper.
19. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
20. Parry, G. (1983). A British version of the Attitudes Toward Women Scale (AWS-B). British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 261-263.
21. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
22. Reid, P. T. (1988). Racism and sexism: Comparisons and conflicts. In P. A. Katz & D. A. Taylor (Eds.), Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy. London: Plenum Press.
23. Sears, D. O., & Kinder, D. R. (1971). Racial tensions and voting in Los Angeles. In W. Z. Hirsch (Ed.), Los Angeles: Viability and prospects for metropolitan leadership. New York: Praeger.
24. Sears, D. O., & Kinder, D. R. (1985). Whites' opposition to busing: On conceptualizing and operationalizing group conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1148-1161.
25. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. (1972). The Attitudes Toward Women Scale. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 2, 1-52.
26. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1673-1682.
27. Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199-214.
28. Swim, J. K., & Cohen, L. L. (1997). Overt, covert and subtle sexism: A comparison between the Attitudes Toward Women and Modern Sexism Scales. Psychology of Women Quarterly 21, 103-119.
29. Tajfel, H. (1982). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M., & Joly, S. (1995). Neo Sexism: Plus ça change, plus c'est pareil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 842-849.
31. Wiener, R. L., Hurt, L., Russell, B., Mannen, K., & Gasper, C. (1997). Perceptions of sexual harassment: The effects of gender, legal standard, and ambivalent sexism. Law and Human Behavior; 21, 71-93.