Change blindness and its implications for complex monitoring and control systems design and operator training

Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 423-451

  Durlach, Paula J ^a  

^a Simulator Systems Research Unit   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS; MONITORING; USER INTERFACES;

CHANGE BLINDNESS; OPERATOR TRAINING; VISUAL DISPLAYS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 13644251133     PISSN: 07370024     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327051hci1904_10     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Austen, E., & Enns,J. T. (2000). Change detection: Paying attention to detail. Psyche, 6. Retrieved on March 28, 2002 from http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v6/psyche-6-11-austen.html
2. Blackmore, S.J., Brelstaff, G., Nelson, K., & Troscianko, T. (1995). Is the richness of our visual world an illusion? Transsaccadic memory for complex scenes. Perception, 24, 1075-1081.
3. Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55-81.
4. Chastain, G., & Cheal, M. (2001). Attentional capture with various distractor and target types. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 979-990.
5. Chastain, G., Cheal, M., & Kuskova, V. (2002). Inappropriate capture by diversionary dynamic elements. Visual Cognition, 9, 355-381.
6. de Groot, A. D., Gobet, F., & Jongman, R. W. (1996). Perception and memory in chess: Studies in the heuristics of the professional eye. Assen, Netherlands: Van Gorcum & Co B.V.
7. DiVita, J., Obermeyer, R. Nygren, T. E., & Linville, J. M. (2004). Verification of the change blindness phenomenom while managing critical events on a combat information display. Human Factors, 46, 205-218.
8. Driskell, J. E., & Salas, E. (Eds.). (1996). Stress and human performance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
9. Durlach, P. J., & Chen,J. Y. C. (2003). Visual change detection indigital military displays. Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference 2003. Orlando, FL: IITSEC.
10. Fahle, M., & Poggio, T. (2002). Perceptual learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (1999). Can new objects override attentional control settings? Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 727-739.
12. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Johnston,J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18 1030-1044.
13. Foushee, H. C., & Helmreich, R. L. (1988). Group interaction and flight crew performance. In E. L. Weiner & D. C. Nagel (Eds.), Human factors in aviation (pp. 189-227). San Diego, CA: Academic.
14. Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature, 423, 534-537.
15. Grimes, J. (1996). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In K. A. Akins (Ed.), Perception. Vancouver studies in cognitive science: Vol. 5 (pp. 89-110). New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Haines, R. F. (1991). A breakdown in simultaneous information processing. In G. Obrecht & L. Stark (Eds.), Presbyopia research: From molecular biology to visual adaptation (pp. 171-175). New York: Plenum.
17. Hancock, P. A., & Desmond, P. A. (2001), Stress, workload, and fatigue. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
18. Jacoby, L. L., Evans, J. D., & Bartz, W. H. (1978). A functional approach to levels of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 4, 331-346.
19. Kämpf, U., & Strobel, R. (1998). Automatic position evaluation in "controlled" change detection: Data-driven vs. concept-guided encoding and retrieval strategy components in chess players with varying degrees of expertise. Zeitschrift fuer Psychologie, 206, 23-46.
20. Levin, D. T. (2000). Race as a visual feature: Using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 123, 559-574.
21. Levin, D. T., Momen, N., Drivdahl, S. B., & Simons, D.J. (2000). Change blindness: The metacognitive error of overestimation change-detection ability. Visual Cognition, 7, 397-412.
22. Levin, D. T., & Simons, D.J. (1997). Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 501-506.
23. McFarlane, D. C. (2002). Comparison of four primary methods for coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 17, 63-139.
24. McFarlane, D. C., & Latorella, K. A. (2002). The scope and importance of human interruption in human-computer interaction design. Human-Computer Interaction, 17, 1-61.
25. Mil-Std 2525B (1999). Department of Defense Interface Standard: Common Warfighting Symbology. Defense Information Systems Agency. Retrieved on Match 28, 2002 from http://www-symbology.itsi.disa.mil/symbol/mil-std.htm
26. Mumaw, R., Roth, E. M., Vicente, K.J., & Burns, C. M. (2000). There is more to monitoring a nuclear power plant than meets the eye. Human Factors, 42, 36-55.
27. Noë, A., Pessoa, L., & Thompson, E. (2000). Beyond the grand illusion: What change blindness really teaches us about vision. Visual Cognition, 7, 93-106.
28. Objective Force Task Force (2002). The objective force in 2015 white paper. Retrieved on December 15, 2002 from http://www.objectiveforce. army.mil/pages/OF%20in%202015%20White%20Paper%20(final),pdf
29. O'Regan,J. K., Deubel, H., Clark, J.J., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Picture changes during blinks: Looking without seeing and seeing without looking. Visual Cognition, 7, 191-211.
30. O'Regan, J. K., Rensink, R. A., & Clark, J.J. (1999). Change-blindness as a result of "mudsplashes." Nature, 398, 34.
31. Parasuraman, R., Masalonis, A. R., & Hancock, P. A. (2000). Fuzzy signal detection theory: Basic postulates and formulas for analyzing human and machine performance. Human Factors, 42, 636-659.
32. Pringle, H. L., Kramer, A. F., Atchley, P., & Irwin, D. E. (2001). The role of attentional breadth in perceptual change detection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 89-95.
33. Rensink, R. A. (2000). Visual search for change: A probe into the nature of attentional processing. Visual Cognition, 7, 345-376.
34. Rensink, R. A., O'Regan,J. K., & Clark,J.J. (2000). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across brief interruptions. Visual Cognition, 7, 127-145.
35. Richard, C. M., Wright, R. D., Ee, C., Prime, S. L., Shimizu, Y., & Vavrik,J. (2002). Effect of a concurrent auditory task on visual search performance in a driving-related image-flicker task. Human Factors, 44, 108-119.
36. Scholl, B.J. (2000). Attenuated change blindness for exogenously attended items in flicker paradigm. Visual Cognition, 7, 377-396.
37. Scholl, B.J., Simons, D.J., & Levin, D. T. (in press). "Change blindness" blindness: An implicit measure of a metacognitive error. In D. T. Levin (Ed.), Visual metacognition: Thinking about seeing. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
38. Simons, D.J, (2000). Attentional capture and inattentional blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 147-155.
39. Simons, D.J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28, 1059-1074.
40. Simons, D.J., & Levin, D. T. (1998). Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 644-649.
41. Smallman, H. S., & St. John, M. (2003). CHEX (Change history explicit): New HCI concepts for change awareness, 47th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Denver, CO: Human Factors and Economics Society.
42. Sohn, Y. (2000). The role of expertise, working memory capacity, and long-term memory retrieval structure in situation awareness. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 60, 5806.
43. St. John, M., Feher, B. A., & Morrison, J. G. (2002). Evaluating alternative symbologies for decluttering geographical displays. Space and Naval Warfare System Center Tech Report 1890: (August). San Diego, CA: Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center.
44. Ververs, P. M., & Wickens, C. D. (1998). Head-up displays: Effects of clutter, display intensity, and display location on pilot performance. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8, 377-403.
45. Werner, S., & Thies, B. (2000). Is change blindness attenuated by domain-specific expertise? An expert-novices comparison of change detection in football images. Visual Cognition, 7, 163-173.
46. Wickens, C. D., & Carswell, C. M. (1995). The proximity compatibility principle: Its psychological foundation and relevance to display design. Human Factors, 37, 473-494.
47. Williams, P., & Simons, D.J. (2000). Detection changes in novel, complex, three-dimensional objects. Visual Cognition, 7, 297-322.
48. Wogalter, M. S., Conzola, V. C., & Smith-Jackson, T. L. (2002). Research-based guidelines for warning design and evaluation. Applied Ergonomics, 33, 219-230.
49. Yarbus, A. (1967). Eye movement and vision. New York: Plenum.
50. Yeh, M., & Wickens, C. D. (2001). Attentional filtering in the design of electronic map displays: A comparison of color coding, intensity coding, and decluttering techniques. Human Factors, 43, 543-562.
51. Zelinsky, G.J. (2001). Eye movements during change detection: Implications for search constraints, memory limitations, and scanning strategies. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 209-226.
52. Zelinsky, G. J. (2004). Detecting changes between real-world objects using spatio-chromatic filters. Psychological Bulletin and Review, 10 533-555.