Attentional capture with various distractor and target types

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 63, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 979-990

  Chastain, Garvin ^a   Cheal, Marylou ^b,c  

^a BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SIZE PERCEPTION;

EID: 0035431670     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194517     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ATCHLEY, P., KRAMER, A. F., & HILLSTROM, A. P. (2000). Contingent capture for onsets and offsets: Attentional set for perceptual transients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 594-606.
2. BACON, W. F., & EGETH, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 485-496.
3. CHASTAIN, G. (1996). Multiple-element line segment precues: Orientation and location effects on attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1015-1025.
4. CHASTAIN, G., & CHEAL, M. (1998). Automatic versus directed attention with single-element and multiple-element precues. Visual Cognition, 5, 339-364.
5. CHASTAIN, G., & CHEAL, M. (1999). Time course of attention effects with abrupt-onset and offset single-and multiple-element precues. American Journal of Psychology, 112, 411-436.
6. CHASTAIN, G., & CHEAL, M. (2001). Timing offacilitatory and inhibitory effects of visual attention. Manuscript submitted for publication.
7. CHASTAIN, G., CHEAL, M., & KUSKOVA, V. (in press). Inappropriate capture by diversionary dynamic elements. Visual Cognition.
8. CHEAL, M., & CHASTAIN, G. (in press). Allocation of visual attention depends on type of precue. Genetic, Social, & General Psychology Monographs.
9. CHEAL, M., & LYON, D. (1989). Attention effects on form discrimination at different eccentricities. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 719-746.
10. ERIKSEN, C. W., & COLLINS, J. F. (1969). Temporal course of selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 254-261.
11. ERIKSEN, C. W., & HOFFMAN, J. E. (1972a). Some characteristics of selective attention in visual perception determined by vocal reaction time. Perception & Psychophysics, 11, 169-171.
12. ERIKSEN, C. W., & HOFFMAN, J. E. (1972b). Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 201-204.
13. ERIKSEN, C. W., & HOFFMAN, J. E. (1973). The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 155-160.
14. FOLK, C. L., REMINGTON, R. W., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
15. FOLK, C. L., REMINGTON, R. W., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1993). Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 682-685.
16. FOLK, C. L., REMINGTON, R. W., & WRIGHT, J. H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 317-329.
17. GIBSON, B. S., & KELSEY, E. M. (1998). Stimulus driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for display-wide features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 699-706.
18. GOTTLOB, L. R., CHEAL, M., & LYON, D. R. (1999). Time course of location cuing effects with a probability manipulation. Journal of General Psychology, 126, 261-270.
19. HILLSTROM, A. P., & YANTIS, S. (1994). Visual motion and attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 399-411.
20. HOLMGREN, J. E. (1974). The effect of a visual indicator on rate of visual search: Evidence for processing control. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 544-550.
21. JONIDES, J. (1980). Toward a model of the mind's eye movement. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 34, 103-112.
22. JONIDES, J., & YANTIS, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 346-354.
23. MILLER, J. (1989). The control of attention by abrupt visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 567-571.
24. POSNER, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
25. SPERLING, G., & MELCHNER, M. (1978). The attention operating characteristic: Examples from visual search. Science, 202, 315-318.
26. THEEUWES, J. (1990). Perceptual selectivity is task dependent: Evidence from selective search. Acta Psychologica, 74, 81-99.
27. THEEUWES, J. (1991). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 184-193.
28. THEEUWES, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599-606.
29. WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1995). Automatic capture by contour onsets and offsets: No special role for onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 583-597.
30. YANTIS, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 156-161.
31. YANTIS, S., & HILLSTROM, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 95-107.
32. YANTIS, S., & JONIDES, S. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 601-621.