Species Relationships in Krameria (Krameriaceae) Based on ITS Sequences and Morphology: Implications for Character Utility and Biogeography

Systematic Botany

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 97-108

  Simpson, Beryl B ^a   Weeks, Andrea ^a   Helfgott, D Megan ^a,b   Larkin, Leah L ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMBRYOPHYTA; GUAIACUM; GUAIACUM ANGUSTIFOLIUM; KALLSTROEMIA; KALLSTROEMIA PARVIFLORA; KRAMERIA; KRAMERIACEAE; TRIBULUS; TRIBULUS TERRESTRIS; ZYGOPHYLLACEAE;

EID: 1342330122     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1600/036364404772974013     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. BUSSE-JUNG, F. 1979. Phytoserologische Untersuchungen zur Frage der systematischen Stellung von Krameria triandra Ruiz et Pav. Dissertation presented to the faculty of Christian-Albrechts University. Kiel, Germany.
2. CANNON, W. A. 1911. The root habits of desert plants. Publications of the Carnegie Institute of Washington 131: 67-69.
3. CHASE, M. W., D. E. SOLTIS, R. G. OLMSTEAD, D. MORGAN, D. H. LES, B. D. MISHLER, M. R. DUVALL, R. A. PRICE, H. G. HILLS, Y.-L. QIU, K. A. KRON, J. H. RETTIG, E. CONTI, J. D. PALMER, J. R. MANHART, K. J. SYTSMA, H. J. MICHAELS, W. J. KRESS, K. G. KAROL, W. D. CLARK, M. HEDRÉN, B. S. GAUT, R. K. JANSEN, K.-J. KIM, C. F. WIMPEE, J. F. SMITH, G. R. FURNIER, S. H. STRAUSS, Q.-Y. XIANG, G. M. PLUNKETT, P. S. SOLTIS, S. M. SWENSEN, S. E. WILLIAMS, P. A. GADEK, C. J. QUINN, L. E. EGUIARTE, E. GOLENBERG, G. H. LEARN JR., S. W. GRAHAM, S. C. H. BARRETT, S. DAYANANDAN, and V. A. ALBERT. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 528-580.
4. DE JUSSIEU, A. L. 1789. Genera plantarum secundum ordines naturales disposita. Paris: Viduam Herissant.
5. DOWNIE, S. R. and D. S. KATZ-DOWNIE. 1996. A molecular phylogeny of Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae: evidence from nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. American Journal of Botany 83: 234-251.
6. DOYLE, J. J. and J. L. DOYLE. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
7. DUMORTIER, B. C. J. 1829. Analyse des familles des plantes. Paris: Tournay.
8. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony and compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Systematic Zoology 27: 401-410.
9. _. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
10. GADEK, P. A., E. S. FERNANDO, C. J. QUINN, S. B. HOOT, T. TERRAZAS, M. C. SHEAHAN, and M. W. CHASE. 1996. Sapindales: molecular delimitation and infraordinal groups. American Journal of Botany 83: 802-811.
11. GENE CODES CORPORATION. 2002. Sequencher™ User Manual/ver. 4.1.2. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Gene Codes Corporation.
12. GILBERT, D. G. 1992. SeqApp. Version 1.9a169. Ann Arbor, Michigan.
13. GOLDMAN, N 1993. Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution. Journal of Molecular Evolution 36: 182-198.
14. _, J. P. ANDERSON, and A. G. RODRIGO. 2000. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Systematic Biology 49: 652-670.
15. HELFGOTT, D. M. 2000. Evolution and molecular systematics of Nemophila Nutt. (Hydrophyllaceae) and the woody Bencomia alliance (Rosaceae). Dissertation presented to the faculty of the University of Texas at Austin. Austin, Texas.
16. HILLIS, D. M. 1991. Discriminating between phylogenetic signal and random noise in DNA sequences. Pp. 278-294 in Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences, eds. M. M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. _, and J. P. HUELSENBECK. 1992. Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses. Journal of Heredity 83: 189-195.
18. _ and F. RONQUIST. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian analysis of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
19. KIM, K.-J. and R. K. JANSEN. 1994. Comparison of phylogenetic hypotheses among different data sets in dwarf dandelions (Krigia: Asteraceae): additional information from internal transcribed spacer sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Plant Systematic and Evolution 190: 157-185.
20. LOEFLING, P. 1758. Iter hispanicum. Stockholm: Lars Salvii Kostnad.
21. LOOCKERMAN, D. J. and R. K. JANSEN. 1996. The use of herbarium material for DNA studies. Pp. 205-220 in Sampling the green world, eds. T. F. Stuessy and S. H. Sohmer. New York: Columbia University Press.
22. MADDISON, D. R. and W. P. MADDISON. 2000. MacClade. Sunderland: Sinauer.
23. POSADA, D. and K. A. CRANDALL. 1989, MODELTEST: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
24. RAMBAUT, A. and N. C. GRASSLY. 1997. Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Computational Applications in Biosciences 13: 235-238.
25. RODRÍGUEZ, F., J. L. OLIVER, A. MARÍN, and J. R. MEDINA. 1990. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. Journal of Theoretical Biology 142: 485-501.
26. RONQUIST, F. 1996. DIVA (Dispersal-vicariance analysis). Available at http://www.ebc.uu.se/systzoo/staff/ronquist.html.
27. SAVOLAINEN, V., M. W. CHASE, S. B. HOOT, C. M. MORTON, D. E. SOLTIS, C. BOYER, M. F. FAY, A. Y. DE BRUIJN, S. SULLIVAN, and Y-L. QUI. 2000. Phylogenetics of flowering plants based on combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL sequences. Systematic Biology 49: 306-362.
28. SHEAHAN, M. C. and M. W. CHASE. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships within Zygophyllaceae R. Br. based on morphological, anatomical, and rbcL DNA sequence data. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 122: 279-300.
29. SIMPSON, B. B. 1982. Krameria (Krameriaceae) flowers: orientation and elaiophore morphology. Taxon 31: 517-528.
30. _. 1989. Krameriaceae. Flora Neotropica. Monograph 49: 1-109.
31. _ and J. L. NEFF. 1985. Plants, their pollinating bees, and the great American interchange. Pp. 427-452 in The great American biotic interchange, eds. F. S. Stehli and D. S. Webb. New York: Plenum.
32. _, J. L. NEFF, and D. SEIGLER. 1977. Krameria, free fatty adds and oil-collecting bees. Nature 267: 150-151.
33. _, D. S. SEIGLER, and J. L. NEFF. 1978. Lipids from the floral glands of Krameria. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 7: 193-194.
34. SOLTIS, D. E., P. S. SOLTIS, M. W. CHASE, M. E. MORT, D. C. ALBACH, M. ZANIS, V. SAVOLAINEN, W. H. HAHN, S. B. HOOT, M. F. FAY, M. AXTELL, S. M. SWENSEN, L. M. PRINCE, W. J. KRESS, K. C. NIXON, and J. S. FARRIS. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Botanical Journal of the Linnaean Society 133: 381-461.
35. STEVENS, P. F. 1991. Character states, morphological variation, and phylogenetic analysis: a review. Systematic Botany 16: 553-583.
36. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sunderland: Sinauer.
37. TAMURA, K. and M. NEI. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 10: 512-526.
38. TAUBERT, P. 1892. Leguminosae. II. 6. Caesalpinioideae-Kramerieae. Pp. 166-168 in Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. 3 (3), eds. A. Engler and K. Prantl. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.
39. THOMPSON, J. D., T. J. GIBSON, F. PLEWNIAK, F. JEANMOUGIN, and D. G. HIGGINS. 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 4876-4882.
40. WHITE, T. J., T. BRUNS, S. LEE, and J. TAYLOR. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenies. Pp. 315-322 in PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications, eds. M. Innis, D. Gelfand, J. Sninsky, and T. White. San Diego, California: Academic Press.
41. YANG, Z. 1993. Maximum likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Molecular Biology and Evolution 10: 1396-1401.