Mobile bearings in total knee arthroplasty

Current Opinion in Orthopaedics

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 29-34

  Dennis, Douglas A ^a   Little, Lance R ^a  

^a Ringgold Standard Institution   (United States)

Author keywords

Contract stresses; Implant conformity; Knee kinematics; Mobile bearings; Polyethylene wear; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

AGE DISTRIBUTION; BONE PLATE; GAIT; HUMAN; JOINT MOBILITY; KINEMATICS; KNEE ENDOPROSTHESIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LONGEVITY; MOBILE BEARING; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SHEAR STRESS; SIMULATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 13244265598     PISSN: 10419918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.bco.0000151399.63822.5b     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Beuchel FF Sr. Long-term follow-up after mobile-bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop. 2002; 404:40-50
2. Buechel FF Sr, Buechel FF Jr, Pappas MJ, et al. Twenty-year evaluation of the New Jersey LCS rotating platform knee replacement. J Knee Surg 2002; 15:84-89
3. Buechel FF, Pappas MJ. New Jersey low contact stress knee replacement system: Ten-year evaluation of meniscal bearings. Orthop Clin North Am 1989; 20:147-177
4. Callaghan JJ, Squire MW, Goetz DD, et al. Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement: A nine to twelve-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2000; 82:705-711
5. Dennis DA, Clayton ML, O'Donnell S, et al. Posterior cruciate condylar total knee arthroplasty. Average 11-year follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop 1999; 281:168-176
6. Ranawat CS, Boachie-Adjei O. Survivorship analysis and results of total condylar knee arthroplasty: Eight- to 11 -year follow-up period. Clin Orthop 1988; 226:6-13
7. Schai PA, Thornhill TS, Scott RD. Total knee arthroplasty with the PFC system: Results at a minimum of ten years and survivorship analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1998; 80:850-858
8. Jones VC, Barton DC, Fitzpatrick DP, et al. An experimental model of tibial counterface polyethylene wear in mobile bearing knees: The influence of design and kinematics. Bio-Med Mater Eng 1999; 9:189-196
9. Buechel FF. Mobile-Bearing Knee Arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty 2004; Vol. 19 No. 4 Suppl 1
10. Sorrells RB, Voorhost PE, Murphy JA, Bauschka MP, Greenwald AS. J Bone Joint Surg (A) 2004; 86:2156-62
11. Scuderi GR, Insall JN, Windsor RE, Morgan MC. Survivorship of cemented knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1989; 71:198-803.
12. Emerson RH, Higgins LL, Head WC. The ACG total knee prosthesis at average 11 years. Journal of Arthroplasty 2000; 15:418-23.
13. Li PL, Zamora J, Bently G. The results of the Insall-Burnstein II total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1999; 81:647-53.
14. Chockalingam S, Scott G. Knee 2000; 7:233-238.
15. Jones RE, Barrack RL, Skedros J. Modular, mobile-bearing hinge total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2001; 392:306-14.
16. Barden B, Fitzek J, Loer F, Rotating Platform Components for Revisions of Hinged Knee Prostheses. Clin Orthop 2004; 423:144-151
17. Andriacchi TP, Stanwyck TS, Galante JO: Knee biomechanics and total knee replacement. J. Arthroplasty, 1:211-219, 1986.
18. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Hoff WA, Gabriel SM: In vivo knee kinematics derived using an inverse perspective technique. Clin. Orthop., 331: 107-117, 1996.
19. Draganich LF, Andriacchi T, Andersson GBJ: Interaction between intrinsic knee mechanics and the knee extensor mechanism. J. Orthop. Res., 5: 539-547, 1987.
20. Fukubayashi T, Torzilli PA, Sherman MF, Warren RF: An in vitro biomechanical evaluation of anterior-posterior motion of the knee. Tibial displacement, rotation, and torque. J. Bone Joint Surg., 64A: 258-264, 1982.
21. Lafortune M, Cavanagh P, Sommer III I, Kalenak A: A three-dimensional kinematics of the human knee during walking. J. Biomech., 25: 347-357 1992.
22. Murphy MC, Zarins B, Jasty M, Mann RW: In vivo measurement of the three-dimensional skeletal motion at the normal knee, Trans. Orthop. Res. Soc, pp. 142, 1995.
23. Karrholm J, Brandsson S, Freeman MAR: Tibiofemoral movement 4: changes of axial tibial rotation caused by forced rotation at the weight-bearing knee studied by RSA. J. Bone Joint Surg., 82B (8):1201-1203; 2000.
24. Hill PF, Williams W, Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MAR: Tibiofemoral movement 2: the loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI. J. Bone Joint Surg., 82B (8): 1196-1200; 2000.
25. Hoff WA, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Gabriel SA, Walker SA: A three dimensional determination of femorotibial contact positions under in vivo conditions using fluoroscopy. J. Clin. Biomech., 13: 455-470, 1998.
26. Hoff WA, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Gabriel SA, Walker SA: A three dimensional determination of femorotibial contact positions under in vivo conditions using fluoroscopy. J Clin Biomech 1998; 13:455-470.
27. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, Haas BD, Stiehl JB. Multicenter Determination of In Vivo Kinematics After Total Knee Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2003; 416:37-57
28. Hoff, W.A., Komistek, R.D., Dennis, D.A., and Gabriel, S.M.: Three-dimensional determination of femoral-tibial contact positions under in vivo conditions using fluoroscopy. Clin. Biomech., 13: 455-472, 1998.
29. Rosenberg, A., Mikosz, R.P., and Mohler, C.G.: Basic knee biomechanics. In The Knee, pp. 75-94. Edited by N. Scott. St Louis, Mosby. 1994.
30. Brantigan, O.C., and Voshell, A.F.: The mechanics of the ligaments and menisci of the knee joint. J. Bone Joint Surg., 23: 44-66, 1941.
31. Nordin, M., and Frankel, V.H.: Biomechanics of the knee. In Basic Biomechanics of the Musculoskeletal System, p152. Edited by V.H. Frankel and M. Nordin. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1980.
32. Nilsson, K.G., Karrholm, J., and Ekelund, L.: Knee motion in total knee arthroplasty. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of the kinematics of the Tricon-M knee prosthesis. Clin. Orthop., 256: 147-161, 1990.
33. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, Walker SA, Tucker A. A Multicenter Analysis of Axial Femorotibial Rotation Following Total Knee Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 428: 180-9, 2004.
34. Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Mahfouz MR, Walker S, Outten J. In vivo polyethylene bearing mobility is maintained in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 428: 207-13, 2004.
35. Pooley C, Tabor D. Friction and molecular structure: The behavior of some thermoplastics. Proc R Soc Lond. 1972; 329A:251.
36. Jones VC, Barton DC, Fitzpatrick DP, et al. An experimental model of tibial counterface polyethylene wear in mobile bearing knees: The influence of design and kinematics. Biomed Mater Eng. 1999; 9:189-196.
37. Matsuda S, White SE, Williams II VG, et al. Contact stress analysis in mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1998; 13:699-706.
38. McEwen HM, Barnett PI, Bell CJ, et al. The Influence of design, materials and kinematics on the in vitro wear of total knee replacements. J Biomech 2005.