Rotating platform components for revisions of hinged knee prostheses

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 423, Issue , 2004, Pages 144-151

  Barden, Bertram ^a   Fitzek, Josef G ^b   Löer, Franz ^c  

^a Department for Orthopedic Surgery   (Germany)

^b Kreiskrankenhaus Mechernich GmbH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE GRAFT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EXTENSOR MUSCLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE FIXATION; HUMAN; JOINT STABILITY; KNEE LIGAMENT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; ROTATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

EID: 2942718847     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000127586.10230.cc     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Barrack RL, Lyons TR, Ingraham RQ, Johnson JC: The use of a modular rotating hinge component in salvage revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 15:858-866, 2000.
2. Barrack RL, Rorabeck C, Burt M, Sawhney J: Pain at the end of the stem after revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 367:216-225, 1999.
3. Bourne RB, Finlay JB: The influence of tibial component intramedullary stems and implant-cortex contact on the strain distribution of the proximal tibia following total knee arthroplasty: An in vitro study. Clin Orthop 208:95-99, 1986.
4. Bradley GW: Revision total knee arthroplasty by impaction bone grafting. Clin Orthop 371:113-118, 2000.
5. Brodersen MP, Fitzgerald Jr RH, Peterson LF, Coventry MB, Bryan RS: Arthrodesis of the knee following failed total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 61A:181-185, 1979.
6. Buechel Sr FF, Buechel Jr FF, Pappas MJ, Dalessio J: Twenty-year evaluation of the New Jersey LCS rotating platform knee replacement. J Knee Surg 15:84-89, 2002.
7. Clatworthy MG, Ballance J, Brick GW, Chandler HP, Gross AE: The use of structural allograft for uncontained defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: A minimum five-year review. J Bone Joint Surg 83A:404-411, 2001.
8. Engh GA: Bone Defect Classification. In Engh GA, Rorabeck CH (eds), Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins 63-120, 1997.
9. Ewald F: The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop 248:9-12, 1989.
10. Fitzek JG, Barden B: Rekonstruktionsmöglichkeiten nach Fehlschlägen in der Knieendoprothetik. In Imhoff AB (ed). Fortbildung Orthopädie. Darmstadt, Steinkopff 157-172, 2000.
11. Hanssen AD, Trousdale RT, Osmon DR: Patient outcome with reinfection following reimplantation for the infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 321:55-67, 1995.
12. Hoeffel DP, Rubash HE: Revision total knee arthroplasty: Current rationale and techniques for femoral component revision. Clin Orthop 380:116-132, 2000.
13. Inglis AE, Walker PS: Revision of failed knee replacements using fixed-axis hinges. J Bone Joint Surg 73B:757-761, 1991.
14. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN: Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 248:13-14, 1989.
15. Jones RE, Skedros JG, Chan AJ, Beauchamp DH, Harkins PC: Total knee arthroplasty using the S-ROM mobile-bearing hinge prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 16:279-287, 2001.
16. Kawai A, Lin PP, Boland PJ, Athanasian EA, Healey JH: Relationship between magnitude of resection, complication, and prosthetic survival after prosthetic knee reconstructions for distal femoral tumors. J Surg Oncol 70:109-115, 1999.
17. Keblish PA: The lateral approach to the valgus knee: Surgical technique and analysis of 53 cases with over two-year follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop 271:52-62, 1991.
18. Kim YH: Salvage of failed hinge knee arthroplasty with a Total Condylar III type prosthesis. Clin Orthop 221:272-277, 1987.
19. Kirk PG: Selecting an Implant: A Comparison of Revision Implant Systems. In Engh GA, Rorabeck CH (eds). Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins 137-165, 1997.
20. Rinta-Kiikka I, Alberty A, Savilahti S, et al: The clinical and radiological outcome of the rotating hinged knee prostheses in the long-term. Ann Chir Gynaecol 86:349-356, 1997.
21. Samuelson KM: Bone grafting and noncemented revision arthroplasty of the knee. Clin Orthop 226:93-101, 1988.
22. Scuderi GR: Revision total knee arthroplasty: How much constraint is enough? Clin Orthop 392:300-305, 2001.
23. Springer BD, Hanssen AD, Sim FH, Lewallen DG: The kinematic rotating hinge prosthesis for complex knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 392:283-291, 2001.
24. Stiehl JB: World experience with Low Contact Stress mobilebearing total knee arthroplasty: A literature review. Orthopedics 25(2 Suppl):S213-S217, 2002.
25. Vince KG, Long W: Revision knee arthroplasty: The limits of press fit medullary fixation. Clin Orthop 317:172-177, 1995.
26. Westrich GH, Mollano AV, Sculco TP, et al: Rotating hinge total knee arthroplasty in severely affected knees. Clin Orthop 379:195-208, 2000.
27. Whiteside LA, Bicalho PS: Radiologic and histologic analysis of morselized allograft in revision total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 357:149-156, 1998.