Slippery slopes to apprehension: Rationality and graphical depictions of increasingly threatening trends

Communication Research

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 3-28

  Berger, Charles R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Apprehension; Graphical depictions; Rationality; Threatening trends

Indexed keywords

EID: 12944270300     PISSN: 00936502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093650204271397     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Altheide, D. L. (2002). Creating fear: News and the construction of crisis. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
2. Baesler, E. J. (1991). Message processing of evidence and the long-term retention and judgment of beliefs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.
3. Baesler, E. J., & Burgoon, J. K. (1994). The temporal effects of story and statistical evidence on belief change. Communication Research, 21, 582-602.
4. Berger, C. R. (1998). Processing quantitative data about risk and threat in news reports. Journal of Communication, 48(3), 87-106.
5. Berger, C. R. (2000). Quantitative depictions of threatening trends in news reports: The scary world of frequency data. Human Communication Research, 26, 27-52.
6. Berger, C. R. (2001). Making it worse than it is: Quantitative depictions of threatening trends in the news. Journal of Communication, 46, 655-677.
7. Berger, C. R. (2002). Base-rate bingo: Ephemeral effects of population data on cognitive responses, apprehension, and perceived risk. Communication Research, 29, 99-124.
8. Berger, C. R., Johnson, J. T., & Lee, E.-J. (2003). Antidotes for anthrax anecdotes: The role of rationality and base-rate data in assuaging apprehension. Communication Research, 30, 198-223.
9. Berger, C. R., Lee, E.-J., & Johnson, J. T. (2003). Gender, rationality, and baserate explanations for increasing trends. Communication Research, 30, 737-765.
10. Brosius, H.-B. (1993). The effects of emotional pictures in television news. Communication Research, 20, 105-124.
11. Brosius, H.-B., & Bathelt, A. (1994). The utility of exemplars in persuasive communications. Communication Research, 21, 48-78.
12. Cantor, J. (2002). Fright reactions to mass media. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 287-306). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73-96). New York: Guilford.
15. Clark, H. H. ( 1996). Using language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Cohl, H. A. (1997). Are we scaring ourselves to death?: How pessimism, paranoia, and a misguided media are leading us toward disaster. New York: St. Martin's.
17. Crossen, C. (1994). Tainted truth: The manipulation of fact in America. New York: Simon & Schuster.
18. Davis, S., & Mares, M.-L. (1998). Effects of talk show viewing on adolescents. Journal of Communication, 48(3), 69-86.
19. De Becker, G. (2002). Fear less: Real truth about risk, safety, and security in a time of terrorism. New York: Little, Brown.
20. DeLosh, E. L., Busemeyer, J. R., McDaniel, M. A. (1997). Extrapolation: The sine qua non for abstraction in function learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 968-986.
21. Epstein, S. (1990). Cognitive-experiential self-theory. In L. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 165-192). New York: Guilford.
22. Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709-724.
23. Epstein, S. (2003). Cognitive-experiential self-theory of personality. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Personality and social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 159-184). New York: John Wiley.
24. Epstein, S., & Pacini, R. (1999). Some basic issues regarding dual-process theories from the perspective of cognitive-experiential self-theory. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 462-482). New York: Guilford.
25. Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytic-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 390-405.
26. Funkhouser, H. G. (1937). Historical development of the graphical representation of statistical data. Osiris, 3, 269-404.
27. Furedi, F. (1997). The culture of fear: Risk taking and the morality of low expectation. London: Cassell.
28. Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 6, 223-230.
29. Gibson, R., & Zillmann, D. (1994). Exaggerated versus representative exemplification in news reports. Communication Research, 21, 603-624.
30. Gigerenzer, G. (1998). Ecological intelligence: An adaptation for frequencies. In D. D. Cummins & C. Allen (Eds.), The evolution of mind (pp. 9-29). New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Glassner, B. (1999). Culture of fear: Why Americans are afraid of the wrong things. New York: Basic Books.
32. Hirsch, P. (1980). The "scary world" of the nonviewer and other anomalies: A reanalysis of Gerbner et al.'s findings on cultivation analysis. Communication Research, 7, 403-456.
33. Hirsch, P. (1981). On not learning from one's own mistakes: A reanalysis of Gerbner et al.'s findings on cultivation analysis, part II. Communication Research, 8, 3-37.
34. Lohse, G. L. (1993). A cognitive model for understanding graphical perception. Human-Computer Interaction, 8, 353-388.
35. Mares, M.-L. (1996). The role of source confusions in television's cultivation of social reality judgments. Human Communication Research, 23, 278-297.
36. Morgan, M., & Shanahan, J. (1997). Two decades of cultivation research: An appraisal and meta-analysis. In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 20 (pp. 1-45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1990). Cultivation analysis: Conceptualization and methodology. In N. Signorielli & M. Morgan (Eds.), Cultivation analysis: New directions in media effects research (pp. 13-34). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38. Norris, P., & Epstein, S. (2002). The investigation of some fundamental issues concerning rational-analytical and intuitive-experiential thinking styles with a short form of the Rational-Experiential Inventory. Manuscript submitted for publication.
39. Pacini, R., & Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratiobias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 972-987.
40. Paulos, J. A. (1995). A mathematician reads the newspaper. New York: Basic Books.
41. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. New York: Springer-Verlag.
42. Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 41-72). New York: Guilford.
43. Pinker, S. (1990). A theory of graph comprehension. In R. Freedle (Ed.), Artificial intelligence and the future of testing (pp. 73-126). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44. Pryor, F. L., & Schaffer, D. L. (1999). Who's not working and why: Employment, cognitive skills, wages, and the changing U. S. labor market. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45. Schwartz, L. M., Woloshin, S., Black, W. C., & Welch, H. G. (1997). The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127, 966-972.
46. Shrum, L. J. (2001). Processing strategy moderates the cultivation effect. Human Communication Research, 27, 94-120.
47. Shrum, L. J. (2002). Media consumption and perceptions of social reality: Effects and underlying processes. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 69-95). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48. Shrum, L. J., & O'Guinn, T. C. (1993). Process and effects in the construction of social reality: Construct accessibility as an explanatory variable. Communication Research, 20, 436-471.
49. Simkin, D. & Hastie, R. (1987). An information processing analysis of graph perception. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 454-465.
50. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280-285.
51. Sparks, G. G., & Sparks, C. W. (2002). Effects of media violence. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 269-285). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52. Wagenaar, W. A., & Sagaria, S. D. (1975). Misperception of exponential growth. Perception and Psychophysics, 18, 416-422.
53. Wagenaar, W. A., & Timmers, H. (1978). Intuitive perception of growth. In D. F. Burkhardt & W. H. Ittelson (Eds.), Environmental assessments of socioeconomic systems (pp. 103-122). New York: Plenum.
54. Wagenaar, W. A., & Timmers, H. (1979). The pond-and-duckweed problem: Three experiments on the misperception of exponential growth. Acta Psychologica, 43, 239-251.
55. Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
56. Zacks, J., & Tversky, B. (1999). Bars and lines: A study of graphic communication. Memory and Cognition, 27, 1073-1079.
57. Zillmann, D. (2002). Exemplification theory of media influence. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 19-41). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
58. Zillmann, D., & Brosius, H.-B. (2000). Exemplification in communication: The influence of case reports on the perception of issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
59. Zillmann, D., Gibson, R., Ordman, V. J., & Aust, C. F. (1994). Effects of human-interest stories in broadcast news. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 38, 65-78.
60. Zillmann, D., Perkins, J. W., & Sundar, S. S. (1992). Impression-formation effects of printed news varying in descriptive precision and exemplification. Medienpsychologie, 3, 168-185.