Making it worse than it is: Quantitative depictions of threatening trends in the news

Journal of Communication

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 655-677

  Berger, Charles R ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035566486     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/joc/51.4.655     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Baesler, E. J. (1991). Message processing of evidence and the long term retention and judgment of beliefs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.
2. Baesler, E. J., & Burgoon, J. K. (1994). The temporal effects of story and statistical evidence on belief change. Communication Research, 21, 582-602.
3. Bar-Hillel, M. (1980). The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments. Acta Psychologica, 44, 211-233.
4. Berger, C. R. (1998a). Processing quantitative data about risk and threat in news reports. Journal of Communication, 48(3), 87-106.
5. Berger, C. R. (1998b, July). Making it worse than it is: News reports of threatening trends and the scary world of quantitative data. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, Jerusalem, Israel.
6. Berger, C. R. (2000). Quantitative depictions of threatening trends in news reports: The scary world of frequency data. Human Communication Research, 26, 27-52.
7. Brosius, H.-B. (1993). The effects of emotional pictures in television news. Communication Research, 20, 105-124.
8. Brosius, H.-B., & Bathelt, A. (1994). The utility of exemplars in persuasive communications. Communication Research, 21, 48-78.
9. Cantor, J. (1994). Fright reactions to mass media. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 213-245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Chiu, Y. (1999, November 30). 180 charged with DUI. Sacramento Bee, p. B2.
11. Davis, S., & Mares, M.-L. (1998). Effects of talk show viewing on adolescents. Journal of Communication, 48(3), 69-86.
12. Deemers, D. P., & Nichols, S. (1987). Precision journalism: A practical guide. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13. Dunwoody, S., & Neuwirth, K. (1991). Coming to terms with the impact of communication on scientific and technological risk judgments. In L. Wilkins & P. Patterson (Eds.), Risky business: Communicating issues of science, risk, and public policy (pp. 11-30). New York: Greenwood Press.
14. Ferris, J. (1995, August 14). Hit and runs: Sudden impact, lingering anguish. Sacramento Bee, pp. B1-B2.
15. Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1981). Lay foibles and expert fables in judgments about risk. American Statistician, 36, 240-255.
16. Furedi, F. (1997). The culture of fear: Risk taking and the morality of low expectation. London: Cassell.
17. Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26(2), 173-199.
18. Gibson, R., & Zillmann, D. (1994). Exaggerated versus representative exemplification in news reports. Communication Research, 21, 603-621.
19. Glassner, B. (1999). Culture of fear: Why Americans are afraid of the wrong things. New York: Basic Books.
20. Hirsch, P. (1980). The "scary world" of the nonviewer and other anomalies: A reanalysis of Gerbner et al.'s findings on cultivation analysis. Communication Research, 7, 403-456.
21. Hirsch, P. (1981). On not learning from one's own mistakes: A reanalysis of Gerbner et al.'s findings on cultivation analysis, part II. Communication Research, 8, 3-37.
22. Hogarth, R. M. (1980). Judgement and choice: The psychology of decision. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
23. Mares, M.-L. (1996). The role of source confusions in television's cultivation of social reality judgments. Human Communication Research, 23, 278-297.
24. Meyer, P. (1979). Precision journalism: A reporter's introduction to social science methods (2nd ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
25. Morgan, M., & Shanahan, J. (1997). Two decades of cultivation research: An appraisal and meta-analysis. In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 20 (pp. 1-45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1990). Cultivation analysis: Conceptualization and methodology. In N. Signorielli & M. Morgan (Eds.), Cultivation analysis: New directions in media effects research (pp. 13-34). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27. Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
28. Paulos, J. A. (1995). A mathematician reads the newspaper. New York: Basic Books.
29. Pryor, F. L., & Schaffer, D. L. (1999). Who's not working and why: Employment, cognitive skills, wages, and the changing U.S. labor market. Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Schwartz, L. M., Woloshin, S., Black, W. C., & Welch, H. G. (1997). The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127, 966-972.
31. Shrum, L. J., & O'Guinn, T. C. (1993). Process and effects in the construction of social reality: Construct accessibility as an explanatory variable. Communication Research, 20, 436-471.
32. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280-285.
33. Tonn, B. E., Goeltz, R. T., Travis, C. B., & Phillippi, R. H. (1991). Risk communication and the cognitive representation of uncertainty. In B. J. Garrick & W. C. Gekler (Eds.), The analysis, communication, and perception of risk (pp. 213-227). New York: Plenum Press.
34. Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
35. Zillmann, D., Gibson, R., Ordman, V. J., & Aust, C. F. (1994). Effects of human-interest stories in broadcast news. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 38, 65-78.
36. Zillmann, D., Perkins, J. W., & Sundar, S. S. (1992). Impression-formation effects of printed news varying in descriptive precision and exemplification. Medienpsychologie, 3, 168-185.