Clinical testing of a new pacemaker function to monitor ventricular capture

PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Volumn 28, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2005, Pages

  Alonso, Christine ^a,d   Savouré, Arnaud ^b   Jauvert, Gael ^a   Casset, Cyrille ^c   Ranaivoson, Hanta ^c   Cazeau, Serge ^a   Anselme, Frédéric ^b  

^a InParys ^*  (France)

^b ROUEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^c ELA Recherche   (France)

^d InParys   (France)

Author keywords

Automatic pacing threshold; Pacemaker longevity; Ventricular capture

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; AUTOANALYSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART BEAT; HEART FUNCTION; HEART OUTPUT; HEART VENTRICLE; HEART VENTRICLE PACING; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; LONGEVITY; MALE; PULSE RATE; SAFETY; SPIKE WAVE;

AGED; CALIBRATION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FEMALE; HEART VENTRICLES; HUMANS; MALE; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 12844255098     PISSN: 01478389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00096.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. 2 high impedance, steroid-eluting pacing electrodes. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1996; 19:188-196.
2. 2 electrodes. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1997; 20:2799-2809.
3. Ribeiro AL, Rincón LG, Oliveira BG, et al. Automatic adjustment of pacing output in the clinical setting. Am Heart J 2004; 147:127-131.
4. Simeon L, Duru F, Fluri M, et al. The impact of automatic threshold tracking on pulse generator longevity in patients with different chronic stimulation thresholds. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000; 23:1788-1791.
5. Boriani G, Biffi M, Branzi A, et al., for the Pacemate Study Group. Benefits in projected pacemaker longevity and in pacing related costs conferred by automatic threshold tracking. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000; 23:1783-1787.
6. Seeger W. Autocapture function was introduced to save battery energy and prolong generator longevity. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999; 22:693-694.
7. Clarke M, Liu B, Schüller H, et al. Automatic adjustment of pacemaker stimulation output correlated with continuously monitored capture thresholds: A multicenter study. European Microny Study Group. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998; 21:1567-1575.
8. Sermasi S, Marconi M, Libero L, et al. Italian experience with AutoCapture in conjunction with a membrane lead. Pacesetter Automatic Control of Energy and Membrane Automatic Threshold Evaluation (Pacemate) Study Group. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1996; 19:1799-1804.
9. Lau C, Cameron DA, Nishimura SC, et al. A cardiac evoked response algorithm providing threshold tracking: A North American multicenter study. Clinical Investigators of the Microny-Regency Clinical Evaluation Study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000; 23:953-959.
10. Moracchini PV, Cornacchia D, Bernasconi M, et al. High impedance low energy pacing leads: Long-term results with a very small surface area steroid-eluting lead compared to three conventional electrodes. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999; 22:326-334.
11. Schuchert A, Meinertz T. A randomized study on the effects of pacemaker programming to a lower output on projected pulse generator longevity. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2001; 24:1234-1239.
12. Schwaab B, Fröhlig G, Schwerdt H, et al. Telemetry guided pacemaker programming: Impact of output amplitude and the use of low threshold leads on projected pacemaker longevity. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998; 21:2055-2063.
13. Lazarus A, Taskiran M, Ritter P, et al. Reduction in energy pacing thresholds by overlapping biphasic stimulation versus conventional bipolar pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998; 21:2166-2170.
14. Duru F, Bauersfeld U, Schüller H, et al. Threshold tracking pacing based on beat by beat evoked response detection: Clinical benefits and potential problems. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2000; 4:511-522.
15. Wilke A, Schubert M, Kaltofen G, et al. Prospective evaluation of a novel auto-threshold function. (abstract) Europace 2003; 4(Suppl. B):B151.