A cardiac evoked response algorithm providing threshold tracking: A North American multicenter study

PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 953-959

  Lau, Ching ^a,i   Cameron, Douglas A ^b   Nishimura, Sandra C ^a   Ahern, Thomas ^c   Freedman, Roger A ^d   Ellenbogen, Kenneth ^e   Greenberg, Steven ^f   Baker, James ^g   Meacham, Donald ^h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^c SUNRISE HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^e VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL   (United States)

^g SAINT THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United States)

^h Baptist Hospital   (United States)

ⁱ NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

AutoCapture; Automaticity; Evoked response; Polarization signal; Thresholds

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEART AUTOMATICITY; HEART PACING; HOLTER MONITORING; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POLARIZATION;

EID: 0034046965     PISSN: 01478389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb00880.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. 1. Furukawa T, Horscovici H, Dosai T, et al. Rapid assessment of rate and antiarrhythmic drug effect on the myocardium using asymmetric biphasic pulse stimulation. PACE 1989; 12:52-63.
2. 2. Callaghan F, Vollmann W, Livingston A, et al. The ventricular depolarization gradient: Effects of exercise, pacing rate, epinephrine, and intrinsic heart rate control on the right ventricular evoked response. PACE 1989; 12:1115-1130.
3. 3. Stevens SK, Haffajee CI, Naccarelli GV, et al. Effects of oral propafenone on defibrillation and pacing thresholds in patients receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28:418-422.
4. 4. Vonk BFM, VanOort G. New method of atrial and ventricular capture detection. PACE 1998; 21:217-222.
5. 5. Feld GK, Love CJ, Camerlo J, et al. A new pacemaker algorithm for continuous capture verification and automatic threshold determination: Elimination of pacemaker afterpotential utilizing a triphasic charge balancing system. PACE 1992; 15:171-178.
6. 6. Brouwer J, Nagelkerke D, DeJongste MJL, et al. Analysis of the morphology of the unipolar endocardial paced evoked response. PACE 1990; 13:302-313.
7. 7. Pacesetter: Passive Plus and Passive Plus DX; Endocardial Pacing Leads. Technical Manual © Copyright 1995; Pacesetter, Inc., A St. Jude Medical Co., Sylmar, CA, USA.
8. 8. Pacesetter: Tendril DX; Endocardial Pacing Leads. Technical Manual © Copyright 1995; Pacesetter, Inc., A St. Jude Medical Co., Sylmar, CA, USA.
9. 9. Pacesetter: Regency SR+ and SR [2400L and 2404L]; Regency SR+ with AutoCapture. User Manual © Copyright 1995; Pacesetter AB, A St. Jude Medical Co., Solna, Sweden.
10. 10. Preston TA, Bowers DL. Clinical application of the threshold tracking pacemaker. Am J Cardiol 1975; 36:322-326.
11. 11. Preston TA, Bowers DL. The automatic threshold tracking pacemaker. Med Inst 1974; 8:322-355.
12. 12. Baig MW, Cowan JC, Perrins EJ. Comparison of unipolar and bipolar ventricular paced evoked responses. Br Heart J 1992; 68:398-340.
13. 13. Boute W, Cals GLM, Heijer PD, et al. Morphology of endocardial T-waves of fusion beats. PACE 1988; 11:1693-1697.
14. 14. Bernstein AD, Parsonnet V. Survey of cardiac pacing and defibrillation in the United States in 1993. Am J Cardiol 1996; 78:187-196.
15. 15. Goldman BS, Nishimura SC, Lau C. Survey of cardiac pacing in Canada (1993). Can J Cardiol 1996; 12:573-578.
16. 16. Hua W, Mond HG, Strathmore N. Chronic steroid-eluting lead performance: A comparison of atrial and ventricular pacing. PACE 1997; 20:17-24.
17. 17. Clarke M, Liu B, Schuller H, et al. Automatic adjustment of pacemaker stimulation output correlated with continuously monitored capture thresholds: A multicenter study. PACE 1998; 21:1567-1575.