Prosodic Form and Parsing Commitments

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 291-318

  Watt, Sheila M ^a   Murray, Wayne S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

COGNITION; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0030099378     PISSN: 00906905     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF01708575     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Balota, D., & Chumbley, J. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340-357.
2. Beach, C. M. (1988). The influence of higher level linguistic information on production of duration and pitch patterns at syntactic boundaries. Paper presented to Acoustical Society, November, 1988.
3. Cutler, A., & Isard, S. (1980). The production of prosody. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language Production: Vol 1. Speech and talk, (pp. 245-269). New York: Academic Press.
4. Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. (1990). The use of verb information in syntactic parsing: Evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 555-568.
5. Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage model of the parser. Cognition, 6, 291-326.
6. Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178-210.
7. Holmes, V. M., Kennedy, A., & Murray, W. S. (1987). Syntactic structure and the garden path. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 277-294.
8. Kennedy, A. (1983). On looking into space. In K. Rayner (Eds.), Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes (pp. 237-250). New York: Academic Press.
9. Kennedy, A., & Murray, W. S. (1984). Inspection times for words in syntactically ambiguous sentences under three presentation conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 833-849.
10. Kennedy, A., & Murray, W. S. (1987). Spatial coordinates and reading: Comments on Monk (1985). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 649-656.
11. Kennedy, A., Murray, W. S., Jennings, F., & Reid, C. (1989). Parsing complements: Comments on the generality of the principle of minimal attachment. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, SI 51-76.
12. Kjelgaard, M. M., & Speer, S. R. (1994). Prosodic structure influences syntactic attachments during the course of sentence comprehension. CUNY Sentence Processing Conference. New York, N.Y.
13. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K., Warren, P., Grenier, P., & Lee, C. S. (1992). Prosodic effects in minimal attachment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 73-87.
14. McAllister, J., Colrain, I., & Gravatt, B. (1995). Prosodic cues in the interpretation of spoken garden path sentences: Evidence from event related brain potentials. Paper in preparation.
15. Murray, W. S., & Kennedy, A. (1988). Spatial coding in the processing of anaphor by good and poor readers: Evidence from eye movement analyses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 693-718.
16. Murray, W. S., Watt, S. M., & Kennedy, A. (1996). Modality, processing options and the garden path. Language and Cognitive Processes, revision under review.
17. Nagel, N. H., Shapiro, L. P., Tuller, B., & Nawy, R. (1996). Prosodic influences on the resolution of temporal ambiguity during on-line sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 315-340.
18. Nicol, J. L., & Pickering, M. J. (1993). Processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences: Evidence from semantic priming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 207-237.
19. Pynte, J., & Prieur, B. (1996). Prosodic breaks and attachment decisions in sentence parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes, in press.
20. Rayner, K., & Frazier, L. (1987). Parsing temporarily ambiguous complements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 657-673.
21. Selkirk, E. O. (1986). On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 371-405.
22. Speer, S. R., & Dobroth, K. M. (1993). Rhythmic effects in auditory and visual sentence processing. Paper presented to Psychonomic Society, Washington, D.C.
23. Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Kello, C. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 528-553.
24. Tyler, L. (1993). Personal communication to Watt, S.
25. Warren, P., Grabe, E., & Nolan, F. (1995). Prosody, phonology and parsing in closure ambiguities. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 6, 457-486.
26. Watt, S. M. (1992). The auditory parsing of complement sentences. Ph.D., University of Dundee.
27. Watt, S. M., & Murray, W. S. (1993). 'Complement' sentence parsing in the auditory modality. CUNY Sentence Processing Conference, Amherst, Mass.
28. Wright, B., & Garrett, M. (1984). Lexical decision in sentences: Effects of syntactic structure. Memory & Cognition, 12, 31-45.