Does prosody support or direct sentence processing?

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 11, Issue 1-2, 1996, Pages 193-212

  Stirling, Lesley ^a   Wales, Roger ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21344472299     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/016909696387268     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Beach, C.M. (1991). The interpretation of prosodic patterns at points of syntactic structure ambiguity: Evidence for cue trading relations. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 644-663.
2. Boland, J.E. (1993). The role of verb argument structure in sentence processing: Distinguishing between syntactic and semantic effects. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 133-152.
3. Clifton, C., Frazier, L., & Connine, C. (1984). Lexical expectations in sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 696-708.
4. Cooper, W.E., & Paccia-Cooper, J. (1980). Syntax and speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. (1990). The use of verb information in syntactic parsing: A comparison of evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 555-568.
6. Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading, pp. 303-330. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
7. Frazier, L. (1989). Against lexical generation of syntax. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process, pp. 505-528. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178-210.
9. Gorrell, P. (1989). Establishing the loci of serial and parallel effects in syntactic processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 61-74.
10. Gorrell, P. (1991). Subcategorisation and sentence processing. In R. Berwick, S. Abney, & C. Tenny (Eds), Principle-based parsing: Computation and psycholinguistics, pp. 279-300. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
11. Gorrell, P. (1995). Syntax and parsing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Holmes, V.M., Kennedy, A., & Murray, W.S. (1987). Syntactic structure and the garden path. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 277-293.
13. Holmes, V., Stowe, L., & Cupples, L. (1989). Lexical expectations in parsing complement-verb sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 668-689.
14. Kennedy, A., Murray, W.S., Jennings, F., & Reid, C. (1989). Parsing complements: Comments on the generality of the principle of minimal attachment. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 51-76.
15. Kurtzmann, H.S. (1985). Studies in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
16. Lehiste, I. (1973). Phonetic disambiguation of syntactic ambiguity. Glossa, 7, 107-121.
17. Lehiste, I., Olive, J.P., & Streeter, L.A. (1976). Role of duration in disambiguating syntactically ambiguous sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 60, 1199-1202.
18. Lieberman, P. (1965). On the acoustic basis of the perception of intonation by linguists. Word, 21, 40-54.
19. Lisker, L. (1978). Rapid vs. rabid: A catalogue of acoustic features that may cue the distinction. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research SR, 54, pp. 127-132, New Haven, CT.
20. Marslen-Wilson, W.D., Tyler, L.K., Warren, P., Grenier, P., & Lee, C.S. (1992). Prosodic effects in minimal attachment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 73-87.
21. Mitchell, D. (1987). Lexical guidance in human parsing: Locus and processing characteristics. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading, pp. 601-618. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
22. Mitchell, D., & Holmes, V. (1985). The role of specific information about the verb in parsing sentences with local structural ambiguities. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 542-559.
23. Repp, B.H. (1982). Phonetic trading relations and context effects: New experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 81-110.
24. Schäfer-Vincent, K. (1983). Pitch period detection and chaining: Method and evaluation. Phonetica, 40, 177-202.
25. Tessier, D., & Brookes, E.C. (1992). Digidesign developer documentation, version 5.1. Menlo Park, CA: Digidesign Inc.
26. Trueswell, J., Tanenhaus, M., & Kello, C. (1993). Verb specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 528-553.
27. Wales, R., & Toner, H. (1979). Intonation and ambiguity. In W.E. Cooper & E.C.T. Walker (Eds), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merril Garrett, pp. 135-158. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.