Enemies and friends in the neighborhood: Orthographic similarity effects in semantic categorization

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 121-128

  Pecher, Diane ^a   Wagenmakers, Eric Jan ^b   Zeelenberg, René ^a,c  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS; STATISTICS;

HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS; VOCABULARY;

EID: 12444290861     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.121     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 439-461.
2. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
3. Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340-357.
4. Bowers, J. S. (1999). Priming is not all bias: Commentary on Ratcliff and McKoon (1997). Psychological Review, 106, 582-596.
5. Bowers, J. S., Damian, M. F., & Havelka, J. (2002). Can distributed orthographic knowledge support word-specific long-term priming? Apparently so. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 24-38.
6. Carreiras, M., Perea, M., & Grainger, J. (1997). Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 857-871.
7. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
8. Forster, K. I., & Hector, J. (2002). Cascaded versus noncascaded models of lexical and semantic processing: The turple effect. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1106-1117.
9. Forster, K. I., & Shen, D. (1996). No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 696-713.
10. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
11. Landauer, T. K., & Streeter, L. A. (1973). Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure or equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 119-131.
12. Masson, M. E. J. (2002). Bias in masked word identification: Unconscious influences of repetition priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 773-779.
13. McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287-330.
14. McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (2001). Counter model for word identification: Reply to Bowers (1999). Psychological Review, 108, 674-681.
15. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains, Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
16. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1995). Bias in the priming of object decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 754-767.
17. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1996). Bias effects in implicit memory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 403-421.
18. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1997). A counter model for implicit priming in perceptual word identification. Psychological Review, 104, 319-343.
19. Rodd, J. M. (2004). When do leotards get their spots? Semantic activation of lexical neighbours in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 434-439.
20. Sears, C. R., Lupker, S. J., & Hino, Y. (1999). Orthographic neighborhood effects in perceptual identification and semantic categorization tasks: A test of the multiple read-out model. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1537-1554.
21. Vriezen, E. R., Moscovitch, M., & Belles, S. A. (1995). Priming effects in semantic classification tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 933-946.
22. Wagenmakers, E. M., Steyvers, M., Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Shiffrin, R. M., van Rijn, H., & Zeelenberg, R. (2004). A model for evidence accumulation in lexical decision. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 332-367.
23. Wagenmakers, E. M., Zeelenberg, R., & Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (2000). Testing the counter model for perceptual identification: Effects of repetition priming and word frequency. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 662-667.
24. Zeelenberg, R., & Pecher, D. (2003). Evidence for long-term cross-language repetition priming in conceptual implicit memory tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 80-94.
25. Zeelenberg, R., Wagenmakers, E. M., & Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (2002). Repetition priming in implicit memory tasks: Prior study causes enhanced discriminability, not only bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 38-47.
26. Zeelenberg, R., Wagenmakers, E. M., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2004). Nonword repetition priming in lexical decision reverses as a function of study task and speed stress. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 270-277.