When do leotards get their spots? Semantic activation of lexical neighbors in visual word recognition

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 434-439

  Rodd, Jennifer M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4544345069     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196591     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. BAAYEN, R. H., PIEPENBROCK, R., & GULIKERS, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
2. BALOTA, D. A., FERRARO, F. R., & CONNOR, L. T. (1991). On the early influence of meaning in word recognition: A review of the literature. In P. J. Schwanenflugel (Ed.), The psychology of word meanings (pp. 187-222). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. CARREIRAS, M., PEREA, M., & GRAINGER, J. (1997). Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 857-871.
4. COLTHEART, M., DAVELAAR, E., JONASSON, J. T., & BESNER, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. COLTHEART, M., RASTLE, K., PERRY, C., ZIEGLER, J., & LANGDON, R. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
6. FORSTER, K. I. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In R. J. Wales & E. Walker (Eds.), New approaches to language mechanisms (pp. 257-287). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
7. FORSTER, K. I. (1981). Priming and the effects of sentence and lexical contexts on naming time: Evidence for autonomous lexical processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 465-495.
8. FORSTER, K. I., & FORSTER, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116-124.
9. FORSTER, K. I., & HECTOR, J. (2002). Cascaded versus noncascaded models of lexical and semantic processing: The turple effect. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1106-1117.
10. GASKELL, M. G., & MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D. (1997). Integrating form and meaning: A distributed model of speech perception. Language & Cognitive Processes, 12, 613-656.
11. KISS, G. R., ARMSTRONG, C., MILROY, R., & PIPER, J. (1973). An associative thesaurus of English and its computer analysis. In A. J. Aitkin, R. W. Bailey, & N. Hamilton-Smith (Eds.), The computer and literary studies (pp. 153-165). Edinburgh: University Press.
12. MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D. (1973). Linguistic structure and speech shadowing at very short latencies. Nature, 244, 522-523.
13. MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D. (1985). Speech shadowing and speech comprehension. Speech Communication, 4, 55-73.
14. MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25, 71-102.
15. MOSS, H., & OLDER, L. (1996). Birkbeck word association norms. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
16. NELSON, D. L., MCEVOY, C. L., & SCHREIBER, T. A. (1999). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms [On line]. Available at w3.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/.
17. PLAUT, D. C., MCCLELLAND, J. L., SEIDENBERG, M. S., & PATTERSON, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
18. TYLER, L. K., VOICE, J. K., & MOSS, H. E. (2000). The interaction of meaning and sound in spoken word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 320-326.
19. WINER, B. J., BROWN, D. R., & MICHELS, K. M. (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
20. ZWITSERLOOD, P. (1989). The locus of effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing. Cognition, 32, 25-64.