Regional educational technology assistance initiative-phase II: Evaluating a model for statewide professional development

Journal of Research on Computing in Education

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 25-43

  Norton, Priscilla ^a   Gonzales, Carmen ^b  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer experience; Computer self efficacy; Compuur literacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010566645     PISSN: 08886504     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08886504.1998.10782239     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alexander, J. J. (1988). Teachers’ conceptual orientations and the preference, frequency, variety, and application of selected instructional methodology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico
2. Office of U.S. Senator Bingaman. (1997, June 5). Bingaman launches effort to improve technology training for teachers: New measure would equip NM teachers to teach students critical computer skills. Washington, DC: Author
3. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1996). Looking at technology in context: A framework for understanding technology and education research. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 807-840). New York: Simon & Schuster/Macmillan
4. Dodge, B. (1995). Some thoughts about WebQuests [Online document.]. Available: Http://edweb.sdsu.edu/EdWeb_Folder/courses/EDTEC596/About_ WebQuests.html
5. Dwyer, D. C. (1995). Changing the conversation about teaching, learning, and technology: A report of10 years of ACOT research. Cupertino, CA: Apple Computer, Inc
6. Ely, D., Blair, P., Lichvar, P., Tyksinski, D., & Martinez, M_(1996). Trends in educational technology 1995. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology
7. Fullon, M.G. (1990). Staff development, innovation, and instructional development. In B. Joyce (Ed.), Changing school culture through staff development: The 1990 ASCD yearbook (pp. 3-25). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
8. Fullon, M.G. (1991). The new meaning in educational change (rev. ed.). New York: Teachers College Press
9. Fulton, K. (1996). Moving from boxes and wires to 21st century teaching. T.H.E. Journal, 24(4), 76-82
10. Garmer, A. K., & Firestone, C. M. (1996). Creating a learning society: Initiatives for education and technology. A report of The Aspen Institute Forum on Communications and Society. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute
11. Grant, C. M. (1996, July). Professional development in a technological age: New definitions, old challenges, new resources. TERC [Online document. Available: Http://ra.terc.edu/alliance:resources_services/reform/tech-infusion/prof_dev/
12. Hall, G. E., & George, A. A. (1979). Stages of concern about the innovation: The concept, initial verification and some implications. Austin: The University of Texas
13. Hall, G. E., George, A. A., & Rutherford, W. L (1979). lvfeasuring stages of concern about the innovation: A manual for the use of the SoC quesricnnaire. Austin: The University of Texas
14. Harvey, D. (1991). The effects of instructional strategies on secondary science achievement: An investigation of science education in New Mexico. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico
15. Ingwerson, D. W. (1996). A model for technology training: Los Angeles County Office of Education’s Technology for Learning Initiative. T.H.E. Journal, 24(4), 84-87
16. Lewis, A. (1997a). A conversation with Linda Darling-Hammond. The Harvard Education Letter, 8(3), 4-5
17. Lewis, A. (1997b). System-wide professional development: One district puts it all together. The Harvard Education Letter, 8(3), 5-6
18. MacArthur, C., Peterson, D., Kercher, M., Malouf, D., Pilato, V., & Jamison, P. (1993). Mentoring: An approach to technology education for teachers, executive overview. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education
19. McKenzie, J. (April, 1991). Designing staff development for the information age. FromNowOn.Org: The Educational Technology Journal [Online serial], 1(4). Available: Http://www.fromnowon.org/fnoapr91.html
20. McNergny, R. & Carrier, C. (1981). Teacher development. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc
21. Norton, P. (1994). Integrating technology in schools: A cohort process for graduate level inquiry. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 3(2), 163-174
22. Norton, P., & Gonzales, C. (1997). Regional Educational Technology Assistance (RETA) Initiative: A model for statewide professional development. Report prepared for New Mexico State Department of Education. Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory
23. Norton, P., & Wiburg, K. M. (1998). Teaching with technology. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers
24. Office of Technology Assessment. (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection. (Publication No. OTA-HER-616). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office
25. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. NewYork: Basic Books
26. Reil, M. (1994). Educational change in a technology-rich environment. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(4), 452-475
27. Yocam, K. (1996). Teacher-centered staff development for integrating technology into classrooms. T.H.E. Journal, 24 (4), 88-91
28. Wiburg, K. (1997). The dance of change: Integrating technology in classrooms. In D. LaMont Johnson, C. D. Maddus, & L. Liu (Eds.), Using technology in the classroom (p. 171-184). New York: The Haworth Press, Inc