Datiscaceae revisited: Monophyly and the sequence of breeding system evolution

Systematic Botany

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 157-169

  Swensen, Susan M ^a,b   Luthi, Jennifer N ^a   Rieseberg, Loren H ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ITHACA COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

18S RDNA; CELL NUCLEUS DNA; CHLOROPLAST GENETICS; INTERNAL TRANSCRIBED SPACER REGION; MONOPHYLY; PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS; PLANT BREEDING; RIBOSOMAL DNA;

BEGONIACEAE; CUCURBITALES; DATISCA GLOMERATA; DATISCACEAE; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; OCTOMELES; TETRAMELES;

EID: 0032415454     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2419585     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. AIRY SHAW, H. K. 1954. Diagnoses of new families, new names, etc. for the seventh addition of Willis's "Dictionary." Kew Bulletin 18: 249-273.
2. ANDERSON, A. B., W. L. OVERAL, and A. HENDERSON. 1988. Pollination ecology of a forest-dominant palm (Orbignya plmlerata Mart.) in northern Brazil. Biotropica 20:192-205.
3. AVISE, J. C. 1989. Gene trees and organismal histories: A phylogcnetic approach to population biology. Evolution 43:1192-1208.
4. BAWA, K. S. 1980. Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11:15-39.
5. BIRKY, C. W. 1988. Evolution and variation in plant chloro-plast and mitochondrial genomes. Pp. 23-53 in Plant evolutionary biology, eds. L. D. Gottlieb, S. K. Jain. London: Chapman and Hall.
6. BREMER, K. 1988. The limits of amio acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803.
7. CHARLESWORTH, D. 1984. Androdioecy and the evolution of dioecy. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 23: 333-348.
8. CHARLESWORTH, B. and D. CHARLESWORTH. 1978. Model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. American Naturalist 112: 975-997.