Hyperfine interaction in a quantum dot: Non-Markovian electron spin dynamics

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 70, Issue 19, 2004, Pages 1-21

  Coish, W A ^a   Loss, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NUCLEAR OVERHAUSER EFFECT; QUANTUM DOT; THEORETICAL STUDY; WAVEFORM;

EID: 12344286808     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.195340     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. S. A. Wolf, D. D. Awschalom, R. A. Buhrman, J. M. Daughton, S. von Molnár, M. L. Roukes, A. Y. Chtchelkanova, and D. M. Treger, Science 294, 1488 (2001).
2. D. D. Awschalom, D. Loss, and N. Samarth, Semiconductor Spintronics and Quantum Computing (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002).
3. J. Preskill, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 454, 385 (1998).
4. J. M. Elzerman, R. Hanson, L. H. W. van Beveren, B. Witkamp, L. M. K. Vandersypen, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Nature (London) 430, 431 (2004).
5. J. M. Kikkawa and D. D. Awschalom, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4313 (1998).
6. G. Burkard, D. Loss, and D. P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. B 59, 2070 (1999).
7. A. V. Khaetskii and Y. V. Nazarov, Phys. Rev. B 61, 12 639 (2000).
8. A. V. Khaetskii and Y. V. Nazarov, Phys. Rev. B 64, 125316 (2001).
9. V. N. Golovach, A. Khaetskii, and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 016601 (2004).
10. J. Schliemann, A. Khaetskii, and D. Loss, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15, R1809 (2003).
11. A. V. Khaetskii, D. Loss, and L. Glazman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 186802 (2002).
12. A. Khaetskii, D. Loss, and L. Glazman, Phys. Rev. B 67, 195329 (2002).
13. J. Schliemann, A. V. Khaetskii, and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. B 66, 245303 (2002).
14. Y. B. Lyanda-Geller, I. L. Aleiner, and B. L. Altshuler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 107602 (2002).
15. J. M. Taylor, C. M. Marcus, and M. D. Lukin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 206803 (2003).
16. J. M. Taylor, A. Imamoglu, and M. D. Lukin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 246802 (2003).
17. A. Imamoglu, E. Knill, L. Tian, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 017402 (2003).
18. Y. G. Semenov and K. W. Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 026601 (2004).
19. S. I. Erlingsson, Y. V. Nazarov, and V. I. Fal'ko, Phys. Rev. B 64, 195306 (2001).
20. S. I. Erlingsson and Y. V. Nazarov, Phys. Rev. B 66, 155327 (2002).
21. R. de Sousa and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. B 67, 033301 (2003).
22. R. de Sousa and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. B 68, 115322 (2003).
23. Y. G. Semenov and K. W. Kim, Phys. Rev. B 67, 073301 (2003).
24. I. A. Merkulov, A. L. Efros, and M. Rosen, Phys. Rev. B 65, 205309 (2002).
25. S. Saykin, D. Mozyrsky, and V. Privman, Nano Lett. 2, 651 (2002).
26. M. Dobers, K. v. Klitzing, J. Schneider, G. Weimann, and K. Ploog, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1650 (1988).
27. K. R. Wald, L. P. Kouwenhoven, P. L. McEuen, N. C. van der Vaart, and C. T. Foxon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1011 (1994).
28. J. H. Smet, R. A. Deutschmann, F. Ertl, W. Wegscheider, G. Abstreiter, and K. von Klitzing, Nature (London) 415, 281 (2002).
29. G. Salis, D. T. Fuchs, J. M. Kikkawa, D. D. Awschalom, Y. Ohno, and H. Ohno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2677 (2001).
30. R. J. Epstein, J. Stephens, M. Hanson, Y. Chye, A. C. Gossard, P. M. Petroff, and D. D. Awschalom, Phys. Rev. B 68, 041305 (2003).
31. K. Ono and S. Tarucha, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 256803 (2004).
32. A. M. Tyryshkin, S. A. Lyon, A. V. Astashkin, and A. M. Raitsimring, Phys. Rev. B 68, 193207 (2003).
33. D. Paget, G. Lampel, B. Sapoval, and V. I. Safarov, Phys. Rev. B 15, 5780 (1977).
34. M. Gaudin, J. Phys. (France) 37, 1087 (1976).
35. V. V. Dobrovitski, H. A. De Raedt, M. I. Katsnelson, and B. N. Harmon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 210401 (2003).
36. W. H. Zurek, F. M. Cucchietti, and J. P. Paz, quant-ph/0312207 (unpublished).
37. J. R. Klauder and P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 125, 912 (1962).
38. D. Loss and D. P. DiVincenzo, cond-mat/0304118 (unpublished).
39. D. P. DiVincenzo and D. Loss, cond-mat/0405525, Phys. Rev. B (to be published).
40. C. P. Slichter, Principles of Magnetic Resonance (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980).
41. E. Fick and G. Sauermann, The Quantum Statistics of Dynamic Processes (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990).
42. H.-A. Engel and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4648 (2001).
43. H.-A. Engel and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. B 65, 195321 (2002).
44. E. Abe, K. M. Itoh, J. Isoya, and S. Yamasaki, Phys. Rev. B 70, 033204 (2004).
45. M. Fanciulli, P. Höfer, and A. Ponti, Physica B 340, 895 (2003).
46. A. M. Portis, Phys. Rev. 91, 1071 (1953).
47. SW is, e.g., the time taken to inject an electron into a quantum dot.
48. -14 s.
49. tot= 15) spin systems that the resonance is indeed centered at a magnetic field corresponding to the negative nuclear Overhauser field, even for a nuclear spin system with p < 1. Alternatively, a state where all nuclear spins are aligned along the magnetic field can be generated by allowing the nuclear spins to relax in the presence of the nuclear spin-lattice interaction.
50. 2 ≪δ, the dominant contribution comes from f(2τ) at each echo of the CPMG sequence.