Unraveling the human interactome: Lessons from the yeast

Drug Discovery Today: TARGETS

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 79-84

  Navarro, J Daniel ^a,b   Pandey, Akhilesh ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b PUBLIC UNIVERSITY OF NAVARRE   (Spain)

Author keywords

ENGL

Indexed keywords

MESSENGER RNA;

BIOINFORMATICS; CELL FUNCTION; CELL TYPE; CYTOARCHITECTURE; DATA BASE; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; HUMAN; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; YEAST;

EID: 12344265104     PISSN: 17418372     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1741-8372(04)02413-2     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Gavin, A.C. et al. (2002) Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 415, 141-147
2. Ho, Y. et al. (2002) Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 415, 180-183
3. Ito, T. et al. (2000) Toward a protein-protein interaction map of the budding yeast: a comprehensive system to examine two-hybrid interactions in all possible combinations between the yeast proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 1143-1147
4. Uetz, P. et al. (2000) A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 403, 623-627
5. von Mering, C. et al. (2002) Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature 417, 399-403
6. Hughes, T.R. et al. (2000) Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles. Cell 102, 109-126
7. Cho, R.J. et al. (1998) A genome-wide transcriptional analysis of the mitotic cell cycle. Mol. Cell 2, 65-73
8. Enright, A.J. et al. (1999) Protein interaction maps for complete genomes based on gene fusion events. Nature 402, 86-90
9. Marcotte, E.M. et al. (1999) Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. Science 285, 751-753
10. Overbeek, R. et al. (1999) The use of gene clusters to infer functional coupling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 2896-2901
11. Dandekar, T. et al. (1998) Conservation of gene order: a fingerprint of proteins that physically interact. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23, 324-328
12. Tong, A.H. et al. (2001) Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294, 2364-2368
13. Mewes, H.W. et al. (2002) MIPS: a database for genomes and protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 31-34
14. Costanzo, M.C. et al. (2001) YPD, PombePD and WormPD: model organism volumes of the BioKnowledge library, an integrated resource for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 75-79
15. Bader, G.D. and Hogue, C.W. (2002) Analyzing yeast protein-protein interaction data obtained from different sources. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 991-997
16. Bader, G.D. and Hogue, C.W. (2003) An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics 4, 2
17. Kemmeren P., et al. (2002) Protein interaction verification and functional annotation by integrated analysis of genome-scale data. Mol. Cell 9, 1133-1143
18. Deane, C.M. et al. (2002) Protein interactions: two methods for assessment of the reliability of high-throughput observations. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1, 349-356
19. Jansen, R. et al. (2002) Relating whole-genome expression data with protein-protein interactions. Genome Res. 12, 37-46
20. Edwards, A.M. et al. (2002) Bridging structural biology and genomics: assessing protein interaction data with known complexes. Trends Genet. 18, 529-536
21. Forler, D. et al. (2003) An efficient protein complex purification method for functional proteomics in higher eukaryotes. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 89-92
22. Navarro, J.D. et al. (2003) From biological databases to platforms for biomedical discovery. Trends Biotechnol. 21, 263-268
23. Peri, S. et al. (2003) Development of human protein reference database as an initial platform for approaching systems biology in humans. Genome Res. 13, 2363-2371
24. Tong, A.H. et al. (2002) A combined experimental and computational strategy to define protein interaction networks for peptide recognition modules. Science 295, 321-324
25. Bouwmeester, T. et al. (2004) A physical and functional map of the human TNF-α/NF-κB signal transduction pathway. Nat. Cell Biol. 6, 97-105
26. Ong, S.E. et al. (2002) Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1, 376-386
27. Blagoev, B. et al. (2003) A proteomics strategy to elucidate functional protein-protein interactions applied to EGF signaling. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 315-318
28. Zhu, H. and Snyder, M. (2003) Protein chip technology. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 7, 55-63
29. Chien, C.T. et al. (1991) The two-hybrid system: a method to identify and clone genes for proteins that interact with a protein of interest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 9578-9582
30. Smith, D.B. and Johnson, K.S. (1988) Single-step purification of polypeptides expressed in Escherichia coli as fusions with glutathione S-transferase. Gene 67, 31-40
31. Templin, M.F. et al. (2002) Protein microarray technology. Trends Biotechnol. 20, 160-166
32. Aloy, P. and Russell, R.B. (2002) Interrogating protein interaction networks through structural biology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 5896-5901
33. Zanzoni, A. et al. (2002) MINT: a molecular INTeraction database. FEBS Lett. 513, 135-140
34. Kanehisa, M. (2002) The KEGG database. Novartis Found. Symp. 247, 91-101
35. Breitkreutz, B.J. et al. (2003) The GRID: the general repository for interaction datasets. Genome Biol. 4, R23
36. Pazos, F. and Valencia, A. (2002) In silico two-hybrid system for the selection of physically interacting protein pairs. Proteins 47, 219-227
37. Bader, G.D. et al. (2001) BIND - the biomolecular interaction network database. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 242-245
38. Xenarios, I. et al. (2000) DIP: the database of interacting proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 289-291