Sequential lineup advantage: Contributions of distinctiveness and recollection

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 23-37

  Gronlund, Scott D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ARTICLE; BODY HEIGHT; COGNITION; CRIMINOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; POLICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; VISUAL MEMORY; WITNESS;

EID: 12344253179     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.1047     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Anderson, N. D., Craik, F. I., & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1998). The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: evidence from divided attention costs. Psychology and Aging, 13, 405-423.
2. Arndt, J., & Reder, L. M. (2003). The effect of visual information on false recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 28 1-15.
3. Benjamin, A. S. (2001). On the dual effects of repetition on false recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 941-947.
4. Bodner, G. E., & Lindsay, D. S. (2003). Remembering and knowing in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 563-580.
5. Clark, S. E. (2003). A memory and decision model for eyewitness identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 629-654.
6. Connors, E., Lundregan, T., Miller, N., & McEwen, T. (1996). Convicted by juries, exonerated by science: Case studies in the use of DNA evidence to establish innocence after trial (Research Report). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
7. Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17-22.
8. Dobbins, I. G., Kr̀oll, N. E. A., Yonelinas, A. P., & Liu, Q. (1998). Distinctiveness in recognition and free recall: the role of recollection in rejection of the familiar. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 381-400.
9. Donaldson, W. (1996). The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing. Memory & Cognition, 24, 523-533.
10. Dunning, D., & Stern, L. B. (1994). Distinguishing accurate from inaccurate eyewitness identifications via inquiries about decision processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 818-835.
11. Ebbesen, E. B., & Flowe, H. D. (2002). Simultaneous v. sequential lineups: What do we really know? Retrieved June 3, 2003, from http://www-psy.ucsd.edu/%7eeebbesen/SimSeq.htm
12. Estes, W. K. (1997). Processes of memory loss, recovery, and distortion. Psychological Review, 104, 148-169.
13. Gardiner, J. M., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (2000). Remembering and knowing. In E. E. Tulving, & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 229-244). New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Gronlund, S. D. (2004). Sequential lineups: shift in criterion or decision strategy? Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 362-368.
15. Gronlund, S. D., & Ratcliff, R. (1989). The time course of item and associative information: implications for global memory models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 846-858.
16. Gruppuso, V., Lindsay, D. S., & Kelley, C. M. (1997). The process-dissociation procedure and similarity: defining and estimating recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 259-278.
17. Healy, A. F., Fendrich, D. W., Cunningham, T. F., & Till, R. E. (1987). Effects of cuing on short-term retention of order information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 413-425.
18. Hintzman, D. L., Caulton, D. A., & Levitin, D. J. (1998). Retrieval dynamics in recognition and list discrimination: further evidence of separate processes of familiarity and recall. Memory & Cognition, 26, 449-462.
19. Hunt, R. R. (2003). Two contributions of distinctive processing to accurate memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 811-825.
20. Israel, L., & Schacter, D. L. (1997). Pictorial encoding reduces false recognition of semantic associates. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 577-581.
21. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
22. Kneller, W., Memon, A., & Stevenage, S. (2001). Simultaneous and sequential lineups: decision processes of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 659-671.
23. Kolata, G., & Peterson, I. (2001). New way to insure eyewitnesses can ID the right bad guy. New York Times, July 21.
24. Lee, C. L., & Estes, W. K. (1981). Item and order information in short-term memory: evidence for multilevel perturbation processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 7 149-169.
25. Lindsay, R. C. L., & Wells, G. L. (1985). Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 556-564.
26. Mäntylä, T. (1997). Recollection of faces: remembering differences and knowing similarities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 5, 1203-1216.
27. Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer-appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16, 519-533.
28. Nairne, J. S. (1991). Positional uncertainty in long-term memory. Memory & Cognition, 19, 332-340.
29. Nairne, J. S. (1992). The loss of positional certainty in long-term memory. Psychological Science, 3, 199-202.
30. Pozzulo, J. D., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1999). Elimination lineups: an improved identification procedure for child eyewitnesses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 167-176.
31. Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C. F., & Gronlund, S. D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychological Review, 99, 518-535.
32. Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803-814.
33. Rotello, C. M. (2000). Recall processes in recognition memory. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 40, pp. 183-221). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
34. Rotello, C. M., & Heit, E. (2000). Associative recognition: a case of recall-to-reject processing. Memory & Cognition, 28, 907-922.
35. Steblay, N., Dysart, J., Fulero, S., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2001). Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison. Law & Human Behavior 25, 459-473.
36. Swets, J. A. (1998). Separating discrimination and decision in detection, recognition, and matters of life and death. In D. Scarborough, & S. Sternberg (Eds.), Methods, Models, and Conceptual Issues (Vol. 4, pp. 635-702). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
37. Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 1341-1354.
38. Yonelinas, A. P. (2001). Consciousness, control, and confidence: the 3 Cs of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 361-379.
39. Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: a review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441-517.