Reproducibility of fan-beam DXA measurements in adults and phantoms

Journal of Clinical Densitometry

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 413-418

  Ellis, Kenneth J ^a,d   Shypailo, Roman S ^a   Steinberg, Francene M ^b   Lewis, Richard D ^c   Young, Ronald L ^a   Wong, William W ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^d CHILDREN S NUTRITION RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone mineral density; Dual energy X ray absorptiometry; Human; Precision, phantom

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY COMPOSITION; BONE DENSITY; BONE MINERAL; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMAN; MALE; NONHUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SPINE;

EID: 12244299884     PISSN: 10946950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1385/JCD:7:4:413     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Melton LJ 3rd. 2001 The prevalence of osteoporosis: gender and racial comparison. Calcif Tissue Int 69:179-181.
2. Schurch MA, Rizzoli R, Mermillod B, Vasey H, Michel JP, Bonjour JP. 1996 A prospective study on socioeconomic aspects of fracture of the proximal femur. J Bone Miner Res 11:1935-1942.
3. Kanis JA. 2002 Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet 359:1929-1936.
4. Jackson SA, Tenenhouse A, Robertson L. 2000 Vertebral fracture definition from population-based data: preliminary results from the Canadian Multicenter Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Osteoporosis Int 11:680-687.
5. Gillette-Guyonnet S, Andrieu S, Nourhashemi F, Cantet C, Grandjean H, Vellas B. 2003 Comparison of bone mineral density and body composition measurements in women obtained from two DXA instruments. Mech Ageing Dev 124:317-321.
6. Tothill P, Hannan WJ. 2000 Comparisons between Hologic QDR 1000W, QDR 4500A, and Lunar Expert dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanners used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue. Ann NY Acad Sci 904:63-71.
7. Ellis KJ, Shypailo RJ. 1998 Bone mineral and body composition measurements: cross-calibration of pencil-beam and fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers. J Bone Miner Res 13:1613-1618.
8. Vozarova B, Wang J, Weyer C, Tataranni PA. 2001 Comparison of two software versions for assessment of body-composition analysis by DXA. Obes Res 9:229-232.
9. Tothill P, Avenell A, Reid DM. 1994 Precision and accuracy of measurements of whole-body bone mineral: comparisons between Hologic, Lunar and Norland dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers. Br J Radiol 67:1210-1217.
10. Tataranni PA, Pettitt DJ, Ravussin E. 1996 Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: inter-machine variability. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 20:1048-1050.
11. Pocock NA, Noakes KA, Griffiths M, Bhalerao N, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA, et al. 1997 A comparison of longitudinal measurements in the spine proximal femur using Lunar and Hologic instruments. J Bone Miner Res 12:2113-2118.
12. Blake GM. 1996 Replacing DXA scanners: cross-calibration with phantoms may be misleading. Calcif Tissue Int 59:1-5.
13. Blake GM, Parker JC, Buxton FM, Fogelman I. 1993 Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans. Br J Radiol 66:902-906.
14. Phillipov G, Seaborn CJ. 2000 Femur BMD bias associated with DPX-IQ reanalysis of DPX-acquired scan files. Osteoporosis Int 11:167-170.
15. Van Loan MD, Keim NL, Berg K, Mayclin PL. 1995 Evaluation of body composition by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and two different software packages. Med Sci Sports Exerc 27:587-591.
16. Soriano JM, Ioannidou E, Wang J, Thornton JC, Horlick MN, Gallagher D, Heymsfield SB, Pierson RN. 2004 Pencil-beam vs fan-beam dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry comparisons across four systems: body composition and bone mineral. J Clin Densitom 7:281-289.
17. Blake GM, Harrison EJ, Adams JE. 2004 Dual x-ray absorptiometry: cross-calibration of a new fan-beam system. Calcif Tissue Int., 75:7-14.
18. Oldroyd B, Smith AH, Truscott JG. 2003 Cross-calibration of GE/Lunar pencil and fan-beam duel energy densitometers-bone mineral density and body composition studies. Eur J Clin Nutr 57:977-987.
19. Bland JM, Altman DG. 1986 Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307-310.
20. Lodder MC, Lems WF, Ader HJ, Marthinsen AE, van Coeverden SCCM, Lips P, et al. 2004 Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurement in daily practice. Ann Rheum Dis 63:285-289.
21. Gluer CC, Blake G, Lu Y, Blunt BA, Jergas M, Genant HK. 1995 Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques. Osteoporosis Int 5:262-270.
22. Hassager C, Jensen SB, Gotfredsen A, Christiansen C. 1991 The impact of measurement errors on the diagnostic value of bone mass measurements: theoretical considerations. Osteoporosis Int 1:250-256.
23. Pocock NA, Noakes KA, Majerovic Y, Griffiths MR. 1997 Magnification error of femoral geometry using fan beam densitometers. Calcif Tissue Int 60:8-10.
24. Griffiths MR, Noakes KA, Pocock NA. 1997 Correcting the magnification error of fan beam densitometers. J Bone Miner Res 12:119-123.
25. Bolotin HH. 2004 The significant effects of bone structure on inherent patient-specific DXA in vivo bone mineral density measurement inaccuracies. Med Phys 31:774-788.
26. Bolotin HH, Sievanen H, Grashuis JL. 2003 Patient-specific DXA bone mineral density inaccuracies: quantitative effects of nonuniform extraosseous fat distributions. J Bone Miner Res 18:1020-1027.
27. Haddaway MJ, Davie MW, McCall IW. 1992 Bone mineral density in healthy normal women and reproducibility of measurements in spine and hip using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Br J Radiol 65:213-217.
28. Bolotin HH. 1998 Analysis and quantitative exposition of patient-specific systematic inaccuracies inherent in planar DXA-derived in vivo BMD measurements. Med Phys 25:139-151.
29. Economos CD, Nelson ME, Fiatarone MA, et al. 1996 A multicenter comparison of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometers: in vivo and in vitro measurements of bone mineral content and density. J Bone Min Res 11:275-285.