Comparison of bone mineral density and body composition measurements in women obtained from two DXA instruments

Mechanisms of Ageing and Development

Volumn 124, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 317-321

  Gillette Guyonnet, Sophie ^a,b   Andrieu, Sandrine ^b   Nourhashemi, Fati ^a,b   Cantet, Christelle ^b   Grandjean, Hélène ^b   Vellas, Bruno ^a,b  

^a CHU PURPAN   (France)

^b INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

Body composition; Bone mineral measurements; Dual energy X ray absorptiometry; Inter machine differences

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTIOMETRY; ADULT; AGE; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BODY COMPOSITION; BODY FAT; BODY MASS; BONE DENSITY; BONE MINERAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOFT TISSUE;

EID: 0037342787     PISSN: 00476374     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0047-6374(02)00199-9     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 8:1999;135-160.
2. Ellis K.J., Shypailo R.J. Bone mineral and body composition measurements: cross-calibration of pencil beam and fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. J. Bone Miner. Res. 13:(10):1998;1613-1618.
3. Guo S.S., Wisemandle W.A., Tyleshevski F.E., et al. Inter-machine and inter-method differences in body composition measures from dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Age Nutr. 8:(1):1997;12-21.
4. Haarbo J., Gotfredsen A., Hassager C., Christiansen C. Validation of body composition by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Clin. Physiol. 11:1991;331-341.
5. Hagiwara S., Engelke K., Yang S.O., et al. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry forearm software: accuracy and intermachine relationship. J. Bone Miner. Res. 9:(9):1994;1425-1427.
6. Horber F.F., Thomi F., Casez J.P., Fonteille J., Jaeger P. Impact of hydratation status on body composition as measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in normal volunteers and patients on haemodialysis. Br. J. Radiol. 65:(778):1992;895-900.
7. Laskey M.A., Flaxman M.E., Barber R.W., et al. Comparative performance in vitro and in vivo of Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy x-ray absorptiometers. Br. J. Radiol. 64:(676):1991;1023-1029.
8. Laskey M.A. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition. Nutrition. 12:(1):1996;45-51.
9. Mazess R.B., Barden H.S., Bisek J.P., Hanson J. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for total body and regional bone-mineral and soft-tissue composition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 51:1990;1106-1112.
10. Mazess R.B., Barden H.S. Evaluation of differences between fan-beam and pencil-beam densitometers. Calcif. Tissue Int. 67:(4):2000;291-296.
11. Modlesky C.M., Lewis R.D., Yetman K.A., et al. Comparison of body composition and bone mineral measurements from two DXA instruments in young men. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 64:1996;669-676.
12. Pocock N.A., Noakes K.A., Griffiths M., et al. A comparison of longitudinal measurements in the spine and proximal femur using lunar and hologic instruments. J. Bone Miner. Res. 12:(12):1997;2113-2118.
13. Pritchard J.E., Nowson C.A., Strauss B.J., Carlson J.S., Kaymakci B., Wark J.D. Evaluation of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry as a method of measurement of body fat. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 47:(3):1993;216-228.
14. Svendsen O.L., Haarbo J., Hassager C., Christiansen C. Accuracy of measurements of body composition by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in vivo. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 57:1993;605-608.
15. Tothill P., Avenell A., Love J., Reid D.M. Comparisons between Hologic, Lunar and Norland dual-energy x-ray absorpiometers and other techniques used for whole-body soft tissue measurements. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 48:(11):1994;781-794.
16. Tothill P., Avenell A., Reid D.M. Precision and accuracy of measurements of whole-body bone mineral: comparisons between Hologic, Lunar and Norland dual-energy x-ray absorpiometers. Br. J. Radiol. 67:(804):1994;1210-1217.
17. Van Loan M.D., Keim N.L., Berg K., Mayclin P.L. Evaluation of body composition by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and two different software packages. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 27:(4):1995;587-591.