Magnetic nanoparticles through organometallic synthesis: Evolution of the magnetic properties from isolated nanoparticles to organised nanostructures

Faraday Discussions

Volumn 125, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 265-278

  Dumestre, Fréderic ^a,b   Martinez, Susana ^b,f   Zitoun, David ^b   Fromen, Marie Claire ^c   Casanove, Marie José ^c   Lecante, Pierre ^c   Respaud, Marc ^d   Serres, Arnaud ^d   Benfield, Robert E ^e   Amiens, Catherine ^b   Chaudret, Bruno ^b  

^a MOTOROLA INC   (United States)

^b LCC LABORATOIRE DE CHIMIE DE COORDINATION   (France)

^c CNRS   (France)

^d INSA   (France)

^e UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSIDAD CENTRAL DE VENEZUELA   (Venezuela)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COBALT; IRON; NICKEL; OLEIC ACID;

ANISOTROPY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CRYSTALLIZATION; DECOMPOSITION; EVAPORATION; MAGNETISM; NANOPARTICLE; SYNTHESIS; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 12144290771     PISSN: 13596640     EISSN: 13645498     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/b303376g     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Z.-Z. Gu R. Horie S. Kubo Y. Yamada A. Fujishima O. Sato Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2002 41 1153.
2. Y. Lu Y. Yin Z.-Y. Li Y. Xia Nano Lett. 2002 2 785.
3. G. Santamaria V. Salgueirino-Maceira C. Lopez L. M. Liz-Marzan Langmuir 2002 18 4519.
4. S. Liu R. Maoz G. Schmid J. Sagiv Nano Lett. 2002 2 10 1055.
5. U. Simon Adv. Mater. 1998 10 1487.
6. D. L. Klein R. Roth A. K. L. Lim A. P. Alivisatos P. L. McEuen Nature 1997 389 699.
7. Modern Magnetic Materials, ed. R. C. O’Handley, Wiley-Interscience, New-York, 1999.
8. Clusters and Colloids. From theory to applications, ed. G. Schmid, VCH, Wienheim, 1994.
9. M.-P. Pileni J. Phys. Chem. B 2001 105 3358.
10. A. A. Mikhailovsky A. V. Malko J. A. Hollingsworth M. G. Bawendi V. I. Klimov Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002 80 13 2380.
11. H. Zeng S. Sun T. S. Vedantam J. P. Liu Z.-R. Dai Z.-L. Wang Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002 8 14 2583.
12. H. Zeng J. Li Z. L. Wang S. Sun Nature 2002 420 395.
13. V. F. Puntes K. M. Krishnan P. Alivisatos Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001 78 15 2187.
14. J. Legrand C. Petit D. Bazin M.-P. Pileni Appl. Surf. Sci. 2000 164 186.
15. V. Russier C. Petit J. Legrand M.-P. Pileni Appl. Surf. Sci. 2000 164 193.
16. I. Sloufova-Srnova B. Vlckova Nano Lett. 2002 2 121.
17. S. Kang J. W. Harrell D. E. Nikles Nano Lett. 2002 2 1033.
18. M. Chen D. E. Nikles Nano Lett. 2002 2 211.
19. D. V. Talapin E. V. Shevchenko A. Kornowski N. Gaponik M. Haase A. L. Rogach H. Weller Adv. Mater. 2001 13 1868.
20. S. L. Tripp S. V. Pusztay A. E. Ribbe A. Wei J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002 124 7914.
21. V. F. Puntes D. Zanchel C. K. Erdonmez A. P. Alivisatos J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002 124 12 874.
22. M. T. Reetz M. Winter B. Tesche Chem. Commun. 1997 147.
23. P. J. Thomas G. U. Kulkarni C. N. R. Rao J. Phys. Chem. B 2000 104 8138.
24. K. Akamatsu J. Hasegawa H. Nawafune H. Katayama F. Ozawa J. Mater. Chem. 2002 12 2862.
25. L. Nagle D. Ryan S. Cobbe D. Fitzmaurice Nano Lett. 2003 3 51.
26. S. Gomez L. Erades K. Philippot B. Chaudret V. Colliere O. Balmes J.-O. Bovin Chem. Commun. 2001 16 1474.
27. S. Cobbe S. Connolly D. Ryan L. Nagle R. Eritja D. Fitzmaurice J. Phys. Chem. B 2003 107 470.
28. T. B. Norsten B. L. Frankamp V. M. Rotello Nano Lett. 2002 2 1345.
29. S. Mann S. A. Davis S. R. Hall M. Li K. H. Rhodes W. Shenton S. Vaucher B. Zhang J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2000 3753.
30. J. E. Martin J. P. Wilcoxon J. Odinek P. Provencio J. Phys. Chem. B 2000 104 9475.
31. S. Sun C. B. Murray J. Appl. Phys. 1999 85 4325.
32. S. Sun C. B. Murray D. Weller L. Folks A. Moser Science 2000 287 1989.
33. J. Legrand A. T. Ngo C. Petit M. P. Pileni Adv. Mater. 2001 13 58.
34. E. V. Shevchenko D. V. Talapin A. L. Rogach A. Kornowski M. Haase H. Weller J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002 124 11 480.
35. E. V. Shevchenko D. V. Talapin A. Kornowski F. Wiekhorst J. Kötzler M. Haase A. L. Rogach H. Weller Adv. Mater. 2002 14 286.
36. C. Amiens D. de Caro B. Chaudret H. Wally J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994 1891.
37. A. Rodriguez C. Amiens B. Chaudret J. S. Bradley Chem. Mater. 1996 8 1978.
38. R. Choukroun D. de Caro S. Mateo C. Amiens B. Chaudret E. Snoeck M. Respaud New J. Chem. 2001 25 525.
39. K. Soulantica A. Maisonnat M.-C. Fromen M.-J. Casanove P. Lecante B. Chaudret Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2001 40 448.
40. F. Rataboul C. Nayral M.-J. Casanove A. Maisonnat B. Chaudret J. Organomet. Chem. 2002 643–644 307.
41. J. Osuna D. de Caro C. Amiens B. Chaudret E. Snœck M. Respaud J.-M. Broto A. Fert J. Phys. Chem. 1996 100 14 571.
42. F. Dassenoy M.-J. Casanove P. Lecante M. Verelst E. Snoeck A. Mosset T. Ould Ely C. Amiens B. Chaudret J. Chem. Phys. 2000 112 8137-8145.
43. T. Ould Ely C. Amiens B. Chaudret E. Snoeck M. Verelst M. Respaud J.-M. Broto Chem. Mater. 1999 11 526.
44. T. Ould Ely C. Pan C. Amiens B. Chaudret F. Dassenoy P. Lecante M.-J. Casanove A. Mosset M. Respaud J.-M. Broto J. Phys. Chem. 2000 104 695.
45. D. Zitoun M. Respaud C. Amiens B. Chaudret A. Serres M.-J. Casanove M.-C. Fromen P. Lecante Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002 89 37 203.
46. M. Respaud J.-M. Broto H. Rakoto A. Fert M. Verelst E. Snoeck P. Lecante A. Mosset L. Thomas B. Barbara J. Osuna T. Ould Ely C. Amiens B. Chaudret Phys. Rev. B 1998 57 2925.
47. N. Cordente C. Amiens M. Respaud F. Senocq M.-J. Casanove B. Chaudret Nano Lett. 2001 1 526.
48. F. Dumestre B. Chaudret C. Amiens M.-C. Fromen M.-J. Casanove P. Renaud P. Zurcher Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2002 41 22 4286.
49. K. Soulantica A. Maisonnat F. Senocq M.-C. Fromen M.-J. Casanove B. Chaudret Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2001 40 16 2984.
50. K. Soulantica A. Maisonnat M.-C. Fromen M.-J. Casanove B. Chaudret Angew. Chem. 2003 42 1945.
51. S. Otsuka M. Rossi J. Chem. Soc. A 1968 2630.
52. K. S. Suslick M. Fang T. Hyeon J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996 18 47 11 960.
53. 2, in the presence of one equivalent oleic acid. After 48 h, the solvent is either evaporated to dryness, leading to sample 1; or the solution is concentrated and poured into a large volume of cold pentane to ensure precipitation of the particles (sample 2). Cobalt content in each sample was determined by chemical microanalysis at the CNRS center, Vernaison, France.
54. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to determine both particle size, size distribution and interparticle distances. Low-resolution TEM measurements were performed on a JEOL 200 CX (200 kV) at the TEMSCAN facility, Université Paul-Sabatier, Toulouse. More than 200 particles were measured to draw each size or distance histogram.
55. 5) in anisole was heated at reflux for 3 h in the presence of one equivalent (versus the total metal content) of HDA. During this time the initial orange solution turns black. The reaction is conducted under argon to avoid any surface oxidation of the particles. After evaporation of the crude solution to dryness, the solid material has been characterised without further purification step. The nickel and iron contents were determined by chemical microanalysis. Ni: 6.85% Fe: 5.67%. (i.e. metal content 12.52%).
56. Z. A. Peng X. Peng J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002 124 3343.
57. WAXS structural characterisations by WAXS were performed in the solid state. The fine powder was introduced in a thin walled Lindemann capillary of 1 mm diameter subsequently sealed under argon. Measurements of the X-ray intensity scattered by the samples irradiated with graphite-monochromatised molybdenum Kα radiation (0.071069 nm) were performed using a dedicated two-axis diffractometer. Fluorescence from iron and nickel was removed at the measurement step by filtering. Time for data collection was typically 20 h for a set of 457 measurements collected at room temperature in the range 0° < θ < 65° for equidistant s values [s = 4π(sinθ/λ)].
58. F. Lihl Arch. Eisenhüttenwes. 1954 25 475.
59. To be published.
60. FCC packing of nanoparticles, resulting from layer by layer growth on a compact 2D assembly of particles, has already been reported. In this case the interparticle spacings were identical in 2D and 3D assemblies A. Korgel S. Fullam S. Connolly D. Fitzmaurice J. Phys. Chem. B 1998 102 8379.
61. M. P. Pileni J. Phys. Chem. B 2001 105 3358.
62. F. Dassenoy K. Philippot T. Ould Ely C. Amiens P. Lecante E. Snoeck A. Mosset M.-J. Casanove B. Chaudret New J. Chem. 1998 22 703.
63. C. Pan K. Pelzer K. Philippot B. Chaudret F. Dassenoy P. Lecante M.-J. Casanove J. Am. Chem. Soc 2001 123 7584.
64. G. Viau R. Brayner L. Poul N. Chakroune E. Lacaze F. Fiévet-Vincent F. Fiévet Chem. Mater. 2003 15 486.
65. −1. Typical counting times for the 0.6 m detector position were 2.5 min. Background counts, recorded with an empty sample tube, were very low and showed no specific features. The 2D-diffraction patterns were radially integrated using the software package FIT2D (A. P. Hammersley, ESRF Internal Report, ESRF97HA02T, 1997, “FIT2D: An Introduction and Overview”) to display the intensity profile as a function of the scattering angle or vector.
66. Magnetisation measurements were performed on a SQUID magnetometer (MPMS Quantum Design). The temperature was varied between 2 and 300 K according to a classical zero field cooling/field cooling (ZFC/FC) procedure in the presence of a very weak applied magnetic field (10 Oe) and the hysteresis cycles were obtained at different temperatures in a magnetic field varying from + 50 to −50 kOe. The samples were prepared in gelatine capsules in a glove box to avoid any oxidation of the materials.
67. J. L. Dormann F. D’Orazio F. Lucarri E. Tronc P. Prené D. Fiorani D. Cherkaoui R. Noguès Phys. Rev. B 1996 53 14 291.
68. D. A. Dimitrov G. M. Wysin Phys. Rev. B 1996 54 9237.
69. D. Kekrachos N. K. Trohidou Phys. Rev. B 1998 58 12 169.
70. R. W. Chantrell N. Walmsley J. Gore M. Maylin Phys. Rev. B 2000 63 24 410.
71. C. Binns M. J. Maher Q. A. Pankhurst D. Kechrakos K. N. Trohidou Phys. Rev. B 2002 66 184 413.