Comparison of knowledge acquired by students in small-group seminars with and without a formal didactic component

Family Medicine

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 27-29

  Xakellis, George C ^a   Rickner, Shannon ^b   Stevenson, Frazier ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPACT DISK; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; METHODOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; TIME;

ACCIDENTAL FALLS; AGED; CD-ROM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; HEALTH SERVICES FOR THE AGED; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 11844302780     PISSN: 07423225     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Aly M, Elen J, Willems G. Instructional multimedia program versus standard lecture: a comparison of two methods for teaching the undergraduate orthodontic curriculum. Eur J Dent Educ 2004;8(1):43-6.
2. DeLorenzo RA, Abbott CA. Effectiveness of an adult-learning, self-directed model compared with traditional lecture-based teaching methods in out-of-hospital training. Acad Emerg Med 2004;11(1):33-7.
3. Letterie GS. Medical education as a science: the quality of evidence for computer-assisted instruction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188(3):849-53.
4. Holt RI, Miklaszewicz P, Cranston IC, Russell-Jones D, Rees PJ, Sonkse PH. Computer-assisted learning is an effective way of teaching endocrinology. Clin Endocrinol 2001;55(4):537-42.
5. Woo MA, Kimmick JV. Comparison of Internet versus lecture instructional methods for teaching nursing research. J Prof Nurs 2000;16(3):132-9.
6. Chen MS, Horrocks EN, Evans RD. Video versus lecture: effective alternatives for orthodontic auxiliary training. Br J Orthod 1998;25(3):191-5.
7. Sanford MK, Hazelwood SE, Bridges AJ, Cutts JH, Mitchell JA, Sharp G. Effectiveness of computer-assisted interactive videodisc instruction in teaching rheumatology to physical and occupational therapy students. J Allied Health 1996;25(2):141-8.
8. Miller SW, Jackson RA. A comparison of a multi-media instructional module with a traditional lecture format for geriatric pharmacy training. Am J Pharm Educ 1985;49(2):173-6.
9. Smaje LH, Lynn B. Are audiotapes cheaper than lectures? Med Educ 1979;13(2):129-34.
10. Xakellis GC, Gjerde CL. Evaluation by second-year medical students of their computer-aided instruction. Acad Med 1990;65(1):23-6.
11. Dunnington G, Witzke D, Rubeck R, Beck A, Mohr J, Putnam C. A comparison of the teaching effectiveness of the didactic lecture and the problem-oriented small-group session: a prospective study. Surgery 1987;102(2):291-6.
12. Albanase MA, Mitchell S. Problem-based learning: a review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Acad Med 1993;68:52-81.
13. Albanase MA. Problem-based learning: why curricula are likely to show little effect on knowledge and clinical skills. Med Educ 2000;34:729-38.
14. Costanza ME, Luckmann R, Quirk ME, Clemow L, White MJ, Stoddard AM. The effectiveness of using standardized patients to improve community physicians skills in mammography counseling and clinical breast exam. Prev Med 1999;29(4):241-8.
15. Albanese MA, Xakellis G. Building collegiality: the real value of problem-based learning (PBL). Med Educ 2001;35:1143.
16. Colliver JA. Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: research and theory. Acad Med 2000;75:259-66.
17. Copeland HL, Longworth DL, Hewson MG, Stoller JK. Successful lecturing: a prospective study to validate attributes of the effective medical lecture. J Gen Intern Med 2000;15(6):366-71.