Dynamic inducements in R&D investment: Market signals and network locations

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 907-917

  Soh, Pek Hooi ^a,c   Mahmood, Ishtiaq Pasha ^a,c   Mitchell, Will ^b,d  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^d DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 11844261471     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/20159630     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adler, P., & Kwon, S. 2002. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27: 17-40.
2. Ahuja, G. 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 425-455.
3. Amaldoss, W., Meyer, R., Raju, J., & Rapoport, A. 2000. Collaborating to compete. Marketing Science, 19(2): 105-126.
4. Bergh, D., & Fairbank, J. 2002. Measuring and testing change in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 359-366.
5. Bonacich, P. 1972. Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2: 113-120.
6. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. 1992. UCINET IV. Columbia, SC: Analytic Technologies.
7. Brass, D. J., & Burkhardt, M. E. 1993. Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 441-470.
8. Bresnahan, T., Stern, S., & Trajtenberg, M. 1997. Market segmentation and the sources of rents from innovation: Personal computers in the late 1980's. RAND Journal of Economics, 28: 248-270.
9. Burt, R. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Cohen, W. M., & Klepper, S. 1996. A reprise of size and R&D. Economic Journal, 106: 925-952.
11. Coleman, J. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Dahlstrom, R., & Ingram, R. 2003. Social networks and the adverse selection problem in agency relationships. Journal of Business Research, 56: 767-775.
13. Gilbert, R. J., & Newbery, D. M. 1982. Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly. American Economic Review, 72: 514-526.
14. Gulati, R. 1999. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 397-420.
15. Gulati, R., & Higgins, M. 2003. Which ties matter when? The contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 127-144.
16. Hagedoorn, J. 1993. Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 371-385.
17. Hansen, M. T. 1999. The search transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 82-111.
18. Hardle, W. 1990. Applied nonparametric regression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Himmelberg, C., & Peterson, B. 1994. R&D and internal finance: A panel study of small firms in high-tech industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76: 38-51.
20. Lane, P., & Lubatkin, M. 1998. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 461-477.
21. Mizruchi, M., & Stearns, L. 2001. Getting deals done: The use of social networks in bank decision-making. American Sociological Review, 66: 647-671.
22. Nooteboom, B., Berger, H., & Noorderhaven, N. 1997. Effects of trust and governance on relational risk. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 308-338.
23. Ofek, E., & Sarvary, M. 2003. R&D, marketing, and the success of next-generation products. Marketing Science, 22: 355-370.
24. Podolny, J. M. 2001. Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. American Journal of Sociology, 107: 33-60.
25. Portes, A. 1998. Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. In J. Hagan & K. S. Cook (Eds.), Annual review of sociology, vol. 22: 1-24. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
26. Powell, W., Koput, K., & Smith-Doerr, L. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 116-145.
27. Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. 1998. Financial dependence and growth. American Economic Review, 88: 559-586.
28. Singh, K., & Mitchell, W. 1996. Precarious collaboration: Business survival after partners shut down or form new partnerships. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 99-115.
29. Sorenson, O., & Stuart, T. E. 2001. Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. American Journal of Sociology, 106: 1546-1588.
30. Stuart, T. E. 1998. Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 668-698.
31. Stuart, T. E., Hoang, A., Hybels, R. C. 1999. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 315-349.
32. Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 464-476.
33. Uzzi, B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organiza tions: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61: 674-698.
34. Uzzi, B. 1999. Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: How social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 595-618.
35. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.