Vowel Duration Affects Visual Word Identification: Evidence That the Mediating Phonology Is Phonetically Informed

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 151-162

  Lukatela, Georgije ^a,b   Eaton, Thomas ^a   Sabadini, Laura ^a   Turvey, M T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b HASKINS LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PERCEPTION; PHONETICS; READING; VISION;

HUMANS; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHONETICS; READING; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY;

EID: 1142277740     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.1.151     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Abramson, M., & Goldinger, S. (1997). What the reader's eye tells the mind's ear: Silent reading activates inner speech. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1059-1068.
2. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania [Distributor].
3. Baddeley, A. D., Lewis, V. J., & Vallar, G. (1984). Exploring the articulatory loop. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 36(A), 233-252.
4. Balota, D. A., Pilotti, M., & Cortese, M. J. (2001). Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words. Memory & Cognition, 29, 639-647.
5. Besner, D. (1987). Phonology, lexical access in reading, and articulatory suppression: A critical review. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 39(A), 467-478.
6. Boersma, P. (1998). Functional phonology (LOT International Series 11). The Hague, the Netherlands: Holland Academic Graphics.
7. Browman, C., & Goldstein, L. (1986). Toward an articulatory phonology. Phonology Year Book, 3, 219-252.
8. Browman, C., & Goldstein, L. (1989). Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology, 6, 201-251.
9. Browman, C., & Goldstein, L. (1990). Gestural specification using dynamically-defined articulatory structures. Journal of Phonetics, 18, 299-320.
10. Browman, C., & Goldstein, L. (1992). Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica, 49, 155-180.
11. Browman, C., & Goldstein, L. (1995). Dynamics and articulatory phonology. In R. Port & T. van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion (pp. 175-194). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Browman, C., & Goldstein, L. (2001). Competing constraints on intergestural coordination and self-organization of phonological structures. Les Cahiers de l'ICP, Bulletin de la Communication Parlee, 5, 25-34.
13. Byrd, D. (1996). A phase window framework for articulatory timing. Phonology, 13, 139-169.
14. Chen, M. (1970). Vowel length variation as a function of the voicing of the consonant environment. Phonetica, 22, 125-159.
15. Clements, G. N. (1992). Phonological primes: Features or gestures? Phonetica, 49, 181-193.
16. Clements, G. N., & Hume, E. V. (1995). The internal organization of speech sounds. In J. A. Goldsmith (Ed.), Handbook of phonological theory (pp. 245-306). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
17. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
18. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
19. Davelaar, E. E., Coltheart, M., Besner, D., & Jonasson, J. T. (1978). Phonological coding and lexical access. Memory & Cognition, 6, 391-402.
20. Egger, V. (1904). La parole intérieure: Essai de psychologie descriptive. Thèse présenté à la Faculté des Lettres de Paris par Victor Egger [Inner speech: An experiment of descriptive psychology. Thesis presented by Victor Egger to the Faculté des Lettres, Paris] (2nd ed.). Paris: Alcan.
21. Flemming, E. (1995). Auditory representation in phonology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
22. Fowler, C. A. (1995). Speech production. In J. Miller & P. Eimas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition: Speech, language, and communication (pp. 29-61). New York: Academic Press.
23. Gafos, A. (2002). A grammar of gestural coordination. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 20, 269-337.
24. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 256-280.
25. Goldsmith, J. (1990). Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
26. Gotlob, L., Goldinger, S., Stone, G., & Van Orden, G. (1999). Reading homographs: Orthographic, phonologic, and semantic dynamics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 561-574.
27. Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (1996). Effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming: An alternative to lexical access accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1331-1356.
28. Huey, E. B. (1968). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1908)
29. Jun, J. (1995). Perceptual and articulatory factors in place assimilation: An optimality theoretical approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
30. Kenstowicz, M., & Kisserberth, C. (1979). Generative phonology. New York: Academic Press.
31. Kirchner, R. (2001). An effort based approach to consonant lenition. New York: Routledge.
32. Klatt, D. H. (1973). Interaction between two factors that influence vowel duration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54, 1102-1104.
33. Kučera, J., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
34. Laeufer, C. (1992). Patterns of voicing-conditioned vowel duration in French and English. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 411-440.
35. Liberman, A. M. (1992). The relation of speech to reading and writing. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (pp. 167-178). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
36. Liberman, A. M. (1996). Speech: A special code. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Liberman, A. M. (1998). When theories of speech meet the real world. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 111-122.
38. Liberman, A. M. (1999). The reading researcher and the reading teacher need the right theory of speech. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 95-111.
39. Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1989, January 27). A specialization for speech perception. Science, 243, 489-494.
40. Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, A. M. (1989). The alphabetic principle and learning to read. In D. Shankweiler & I. Y. Liberman (Eds.), Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle (JARLD Research Monograph Series; pp. 2-33). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
41. Lukatela, G., Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (1990). Phonemic priming of words and pseudowords. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2, 375-394.
42. Lukatela, G., Eaton, T., Lee, C., & Turvey, M. T. (2001). Does visual word identification involve a sub-phonemic level? Cognition, 78, B41-B52.
43. Lukatela, G., Frost, S. J., & Turvey, M. T. (1999). Identity priming in English is compromised by phonological ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 775-790.
44. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1994). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 331-353.
45. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1996). Inhibition of naming by rhyming primes. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 823-835.
46. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1998). Reading in two alphabets. American Psychologist, 53, 1057-1072.
47. Mohanan, K. P. (1993). Fields of attraction. In J. Goldsmith (Ed.), The last phonological rule (pp. 61-116). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48. Neely, J. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Perfetti, C. A., & Zhang, S. (1995). The universal word identification reflex. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 33, pp. 159-189). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
50. Perfetti, C. A., Zhang, S., & Berent, I. (1992). Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for a "universal" phonological principle. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 227-248). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
51. Peterson, G., & Lehiste, I. (1960). Durations of syllabic nuclei in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32, 693-703.
52. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. E. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
53. Port, R. (1981). Linguistic timing factors in combination. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69, 262-274.
54. Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C., & Jacobs, A. M. (2000). Graphemes are perceptual reading units. Cognition, 75, B1-B12.
55. Saltzman, E., & Byrd, D. (2000). Task-dynamics of gestural timing: Phase windows and multifrequency rhythms. Human Movement Science, 19, 499-526.
56. Saltzman, E., & Munhall, K. (1989). A dynamical approach to gestural patterning in speech production. Ecological Psychology, 1, 333-382.
57. Seidenberg, M. S. (1995). Visual word recognition: An overview. In P. Eimas & J. L. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition: Speech, language and communication (pp. 131-179). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
58. Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 383-404.
59. Steriade, D. (1997). Phonetics and phonology: The case of laryngeal neutralization. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles.
60. Stevens, K. N., & House, A. S. (1963). Perturbations of vowel articulation by consonantal context. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 6, 111-128.
61. Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. (1994). Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 34-80.
62. Van Orden, G. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1269-1291.
63. Van Orden, G. C., Pennington, B. F., & Stone, G. O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488-522.
64. Waters, G. S., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time course and decision criteria. Memory & Cognition, 13, 557-572.