The significance of MR angiography for the diagnosis of carotid stenoses;Stellenwert der MR-angiographie zur diagnose bei karotisstenosen

Radiologe

Volumn 44, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 975-984

  Michaely, H J ^a   Herrmann, K A ^a   Kramer, H ^a   Laub, G ^b   Reiser, M F ^a   Schoenberg, S O ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Carotid artery stenosis; Digital subtraction angiography; MRA; Parallel imaging; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE; GADOBENIC ACID; GADOBUTROL;

AORTA ARCH SYNDROME; ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; ARTERY DISSECTION; CAROTID ARTERY BIFURCATION; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FIBROMUSCULAR DYSPLASIA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; IONIZING RADIATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PSEUDOOBSTRUCTION; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR;

ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; CAROTID ARTERY, INTERNAL; CAROTID ARTERY, INTERNAL, DISSECTION; CAROTID STENOSIS; CEREBRAL ANGIOGRAPHY; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTRACRANIAL ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 11244335427     PISSN: 0033832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00117-004-1110-0     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) investigators (1991) Clinical alert: benefit of carotid endarterectomy for patients with high-grade stenosis of the internal carotid artery. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and Trauma Division. Stroke 22: 816-817
2. Barer D (1998) Endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet 352: 143-144
3. U-King-Im JM, Hollingworth W, Trivedi RA et al. (2004) Contrast-enhanced MR angiography vs intra-arterial digital subtraction angiographyfor carotid imaging: activity-based cost analysis. Eur Radiol 14: 730-735
4. Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, TerBrugge K, Farb RI, Tomlinson G, Montanera W (2003) Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 227:522-528
5. Waugh JR, Sacharias N (1992) Arteriographic complications in the DSA era. Radiology 182: 243-246
6. Wedeen VJ, Meuli RA, Edelman RR, Geller SC, Frank LR, Brady TJ, Rosen BR (1985) Projective imaging of pulsatile flow with magnetic resonance. Science 230: 946-948
7. Patel MR, Kuntz KM, Klufas RA et al. (1995) Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation. Can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography? Stroke 26: 1753-1758
8. Saloner D (1998) Determinants of image appearance in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. A review. Invest Radiol 33: 488-495
9. Krinsky GA, Kaminer E, Lee VS, Rofsky NM, Weinreb JC (1998) The effects of apnea on timing examinations for optimization of gadolinium-enhanced MRA of the thoracic aorta and arch vessels. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22: 677-681
10. Riederer SJ, Bernstein MA, Breen JF et al. (2000) Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography with real-time fluoroscopic triggering: design specifications and technical reliability in 330 patient studies. Radiology 215: 584-593
11. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P (1999) SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 42: 952-962
12. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM et al. (2002) Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 47: 1202-1210
13. Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, Mistretta CA (1996) Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 36: 345-351
14. Kim DY, Park JW (2004) Computerized quantification of carotid artery stenosis using MRA axial images. Magn Reson Imaging 22: 353-359
15. Schoenberg SO, Rieger J, Weber C, Michaely HJ, Waggershauser T, Nitka M, Reiser MF (2004) High-resolution MRA of the renal arteries using parallel acquisition techniques: value of isotropic cross-sectional reformats compared to digital subtraction angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 235
16. U-King-Im JM, Trivedi R, Cross J et al. (2004) Conventional digital subtraction x-ray angiography versus magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of carotid disease: patient satisfaction and preferences. Clin Radiol 59: 358-363
17. U-King-Im JM, Trivedi RA, Graves MJ et al. (2004) Contrast-enhanced MR angiography for carotid disease: diagnostic and potential clinical impact. Neurology 62: 1282-1290
18. Nederkoorn PJ, van der Graaf Y, Hunink MG (2003) Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review. Stroke 34: 1324-1332
19. Back MR, Wilson JS, Rushing G, Stordahl N, Linden C, Johnson BL, Bandyk DF (2000) Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 32: 429-438; discussion 439-440
20. Nederkoorn PJ, Elgersma OE, Mali WP, Eikelboom BC, Kappelle LJ, van der Graaf Y (2002) Overestimation of carotid artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. J Vasc Surg 36: 806-813
21. Anderson CM, Lee RE, Levin DL, de la Torre Alonso S, Saloner D (1994) Measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis from source MR angiograms. Radiology 193: 219-226
22. van Everdingen KJ, Klijn CJ, Kappelle LJ, Mali WP, van der Grond J (1997) MRA flow quantification in patients with a symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion. The Dutch EC-IC Bypass Study Group. Stroke 28: 1595-1600
23. Vanninen R, Koivisto K, Tulla H, Manninen H, Partanen K (1995) Hemodynamic effects of carotid endarterectomy by magnetic resonance flow quantification. Stroke 26: 84-89
24. Aschenbach R, Eger C, Basche S, Vogl TJ (2004) Grading of carotid artery stenosis using high resolution dynamic magnetic resonance angiography in comparison to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. Are stenoses over 70% reliably detectable? Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 176: 357-362
25. Alvarez-Linera J, Benito-Leon J, Escribano J, Campollo J, Gesto R (2003) Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24: 1012-1019
26. Troyer A, Saloner D, Pan XM, Velez P, Rapp JH (2002) Major carotid plaque surface irregularities correlate with neurologic symptoms. J Vasc Surg 35: 741-747
27. Ersoy H, Watts R, Sanelli P, Zimmerman RD, Kent KC, Bush HL, Prince MR (2003) Atherosclerotic disease distribution in carotid and vertebrobasilar arteries: clinical experience in 100 patients undergoing fluoro-triggered 3D Gd-MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 17: 545-558
28. Slovut DP, Olin JW (2004) Fibromuscular dysplasia. N Engl J Med 350: 1862-1871
29. Zuccoli G, Guidetti D, Nicoli F, Giovanardi F, Ferrozzi F (2002) Carotid and vertebral artery dissection: Magnetic resonance findings in 15 cases. Radiol Med (Torino) 104: 466-471