Fish protein hydrolysates from gold carp (Carassius auratus): I. A study of hydrolysis parameters using response surface methodology

Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Volumn 85, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 98-104

  Sumaya Martínez, Teresa ^a   Castillo Morales, Alberto ^a   Favela Torres, Ernesto ^a   Huerta Ochoa, Sergio ^a   Prado Barragán, Lilia Arely ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA METROPOLITANA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Carassius auratus; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Fish protein; Proteases

Indexed keywords

CARASSIUS AURATUS; CYPRINUS CARPIO;

EID: 11244298065     PISSN: 00225142     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.1943     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Kristinsson HG and Rasco BA, Fish protein hydrolysates: production, biochemical and functional properties. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 40:43-81 (2000).
2. Kristinsson HG and Rasco BA, Kinetics of the hydrolysis of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) muscle proteins by alkaline proteases and visceral serine protease mixture. Process Biochem 36:131-139 (2000).
3. Diniz FM and Martin AM, Use of response surface methodology to describe the combined effect of pH, temperature and E/S ratio on the hydrolysis of dogfish (Squalus acanthias) muscle. Int J Food Sci Technol 31:419-426 (1996).
4. Mohr V, Fish protein concentrate production by enzymic hydrolysis, in Biochemical Aspects of New Protein Food, vol 44, Ed by Adler-Nissen J, Eggum BO, Muck L and Olsen H. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 53-62 (1978).
5. Frøkjaer S, Use of hydrolysates for protein supplementation. Properties of protein hydrolysates, including solubility under acid conditions and high palatability, make them suitable for use in medical foods and products for general consumption. Food Technol October:86-88 (1994).
6. Quaglia G and Orban E, Enzymatic solubilisation of protein of sardine (Sardina pilchardus) by commercial proteases. J Sci Food Agric 38:263-269 (1987).
7. Quaglia G and Orban E, Influence of the degree of hydrolysis on the solubility of the protein hydrolysates from sardine (Sardina pilchardus). J Sci Food Agric 38:271-276 (1987).
8. Hoyle N and Merrit J, Quality of fish protein hydrolysates from herring (Clupea harengus). J Food Sci 59:76-79 (1994).
9. Baek H and Cadwallader K, Enzymatic hydrolysis of crayfish processing by-products. J Food Sci 60:929-934 (1995).
10. Benjakul S and Morrissey T, Protein hydrolysates from Pacific whiting solid wastes. J Agric Food Chem 45:3423-3430 (1997).
11. Liceaga-Gesualdo AM and Li-Chan ECY, Functional properties of fish protein hydrolysates from herring (Clupea harengus). J Food Sci 64:1000-1004 (1999).
12. Kim SK, Kim YT, Byun HE, Nam KS, Joo DS and Shahidi F, Isolation and characterization of antioxidative peptides from gelatin hydrolysate of Alaska pollack skin. J Agric Food Chem 49:1984-1988 (2001).
13. Webb KE, Intestinal absorption of protein hydrolysis products: a review. J Anim Sci 68:3011-3022 (1990).
14. Bautista J, Hernandez-Pinzon I, Alaiz M, Parrado J and Millan F, Low molecular weight sunflower protein hydrolysate with low concentration in aromatic amino acids. J Agric Food Chem 44:967-971 (1996).
15. Kristinsson HG and Rasco BA, Biochemical and functional properties of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) muscle proteins hydrolyzed with various alkaline proteases. J Agric Food Chem 48:657-666 (2000).
16. Quaglia G and Orban E, Influence of enzymatic hydrolysis on structure and emulsifying properties of sardine (Sardina pilchardus) protein hydrolysates. J Food Sci 55:1571-1573 (1990).
17. Adler-Nissen J, Enzymatic hydrolysis of fish proteins. Process Biochem 12:18-23, 32 (1977).
18. Sikorski Z, The contents of proteins and other nitrogenous compounds in marine animals, in Seafood Proteins, Ed by Sikorski Z, Sun Pan B and Shahidi F. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 9-26 (1994).
19. Box G and Behnken D, Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics 2:455-475 (1960).
20. Box G, Hunter W and Hunter J, Statistics for Experimenters. Wiley, New York (1978).
21. Schagger H and Jagow G, Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa. Anal Biochem 166:368-379 (1987).
22. Surowka K and Fik M, Studies on the recovery of proteinaceous substances from chicken heads: II. An application of pepsin to the production of protein hydrolysate. J Sci Food Agric 65:289-296 (1994).
23. Ferreira NG and Hultin HO, Liquefying cod fish frames under acid condition with a fungal enzyme. J Food Process Preserv 18:87-101 (1994).
24. Cheftel CC, Ahern M, Wang DIC and Tannenbaum SR, Enzymatic solubilization of fish protein concentrate: batch studies applicable to continuous enzyme recycling processes. J Agric Food Chem 19:155-161 (1971).
25. Hale MB, Relative activities of commercially-available enzymes in the hydrolysis of fish protein. Food Technol 23:107-110 (1969).
26. Imm JY and Lee CM, Production of seafood flavor from red hake (Urophycis chuss) by enzymatic hydrolysis. J Agric Food Chem 47:2360-2366 (1999).
27. Cui H and Pigott GM, The influence of degree of hydrolysis on the structural and functional properties of fish protein hydrolysates from pepsin hydrolysis. Ann Meet Inst Food Sci Technol, Seattle, WA, p 166 (1995).
28. Hall G and Ahmad N, Functional properties of fish protein hydrolysates, in Fish Processing Technology, Ed by Hall GM. Blackie Academic and Professional, London, pp 249-270 (1992).
29. Friedman M, Nutritional value of proteins from different food sources. A review. J Agric Food Chem 44:6-29 (1996).
30. Mietsh F, Fehér J and Halász A, Investigation of functional properties of partially hydrolyzed proteins. Nahrung 33:9-15 (1989).