Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography

Chinese Journal of Digestive Diseases

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 139-148

  Zhong, Linag ^b   Xiao, Shu Dong ^b   Stoker, Jaap ^a   Tytgat, Guido N J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

Author keywords

Cholangiopancreatography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Obstruction; Pancreaticobiliary duct

Indexed keywords

MANGAFODIPIR;

BILE DUCT CARCINOMA; BILE DUCT INJURY; BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; BILIARY TRACT DISEASE; BILIARY TRACT SURGERY; BLOOD VESSEL; CHOLELITHIASIS; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COMMON BILE DUCT CYST; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY; HEPATOBILIARY SYSTEM; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAVENOUS CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MIRIZZI SYNDROME; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREAS CARCINOMA; PANCREAS CYST; PANCREAS DISEASE; PANCREAS DIVISUM; PANCREAS PSEUDOCYST; PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSHEPATIC CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

BILE DUCTS; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CHOLESTASIS; HUMANS; PANCREATIC DUCTS;

EID: 11144295619     PISSN: 14439611     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1443-9573.2004.00174.x     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Wallner BK, Schumacher KA, Weidenmaier W et al. Dilated biliary tract: evaluation with MR cholangiography with a T2-weighted contrast-enhanced fast sequence. Radiology 1991; 181: 805-8.
2. Barish MA, Soto JA. MR cholangiopancreatography: techniques and clinical applications. AJR 1997; 169: 1295-303.
3. Reinhold C, Bret PM. Current status of MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR 1996; 166: 1285-95.
4. Prassopoulos P, Papanikolaou N, Maris T et al. Development of contrast-enhanced virtual MR cholangioscopy: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 1438-41.
5. Neri E, Boraschi P, Braccini G et al. MR virtual encloscopy of the pancreaticobiliary tract. Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 17: 59-67.
6. Dubno B, Debatin JF, Luboldt W et al. Virtual MR cholangiography. AJR 1998; 171: 1547-50.
7. Catalano C, Pavone P, Laghi A et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: combination of MR imaging, MR angiography and MR cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis and assessment of resectability. Eur Radiol 1998; 8: 428-34.
8. Trede M, Rumstadt B, Wendl K et al. Ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging improves the staging of pancreatic tumors. Ann Surg 1997; 226: 393-407.
9. Hochwald SN, Rofsky NM, Dobryansky M et al. Magnetic resonance imaging with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography accurately predicts resectability of pancreatic carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 1999; 3: 506-11.
10. Lopez Hanninen E, Amthauer H, Hosten N et al. Prospective evaluation of pancreatic tumors: accuracy of MR imaging with MR cholangiopancreatography and MR angiography. Radiology 2002; 224: 34-41.
11. National Institute of Health. State-of-the-science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy. NIH Consens State Sci Statements 2002; 19: 1-26.
12. Jara H, Barish MA, Yucel EK et al. MR hydrography: theory and practice of static fluid imaging. AJR 1998; 170: 873-82.
13. Hirohashi S, Hirohashi R, Uchida H et al. MR cholangiopancreatography and MR urography: improved enhancement with a negative oral contrast agent. Radiology 1997; 203: 281-5.
14. Papanikolaou N, Karantanas A, Maris T et al. MR cholangiopancreatography before and after oral blueberry juice administration. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000; 24: 229-34.
15. Ichikawa T, Nitatori T, Hachiya J et al. Breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography with half-averaged single shot hybrid rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequence: comparison of fast GRE and SE sequences. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20: 798-802.
16. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Capps GW et al. Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects. Radiology 1998; 207: 21-32.
17. Irie H, Honda H, Tajima T et al. Optimal MR cholangiopancreatographic sequence and its clinical application. Radiology 1998; 208: 379-87.
18. Kim TK, Han JK, Kim SJ et al. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison between half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo and two dimensional turbo spin-echo pulse sequences. Abdom Imaging 1998; 23: 398-403.
19. Vitellas M Keogan MT, Spritzer CE, Nelson RC. MR cholangiopancreatography of bile and pancreatic duct abnormalities with emphasis on the single-shot fast spin-echo technique. Radiographics 2000; 20: 939-57.
20. Matos C, Metens T, Deviere J et al. Pancreatic duct: morphologic and functional evaluation with dynamic MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 1997; 203: 435-41.
21. Takehara Y. MR pancreatography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1999; 20: 324-39.
22. Papanikolaou N, Prassopoulos P, Eracleous E et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography versus heavily T2-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography. Invest Radiol 2001; 36: 682-6.
23. Fayad LM, Holland GA, Bergin D et al. Functional magnetic resonance cholangiography (fMRC) of the gallbladder and biliary tree with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 18: 449-60.
24. Kim MJ, Mitchell DG, Ito K et al. Biliary dilatation: differentiation of benign from malignant causes: value of adding conventional MR imaging to MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 2000; 214: 173-81.
25. Macaulay SE, Schulte SJ, Sekijima JH et al. Evaluation of a non-breath-hold MR cholangiography technique. Radiology 1995; 196: 227-32.
26. Taourel P, Bret PM, Reinhold C et al. Anatomic variants of the biliary tree: diagnosis with MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1996; 199: 521-7.
27. Yeh TS, Jan YY, Tseng JH et al. Value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in demonstrating major bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1999; 86: 181-4.
28. Guibaud L, Lachaud A, Touraine R et al. MR cholangiography in neonates and infants: feasibility and preliminary applications. AJR 1998; 170: 27-31.
29. Sugiyama M, Baba M, Atomi Y et al. Diagnosis of anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction: value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Surgery 1998; 123: 391-7.
30. Irie H, Honda H, Jimi M et al. Value of MR cholangiopancreatography in evaluating choledochal cysts. AJR 1998; 171: 1381-5.
31. Bret PM, Reinhold C, Taourel P et al. Pancreas divisum: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1996; 199 99-103.
32. Varghese JC, Liddell RP, Farrell MA et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Clin Radiol 2000; 55: 25-35.
33. Soto JA, Barish MA, Alvarez O et al. Detection of choledocholithiasis with MR cholangiography: comparison of three-dimensional fast spin-echo and single- and multi-section half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequences. Radiology 2000; 215: 737-45.
34. Stiris MG, Tennoe B, Aadland E et al. MR cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected common bile duct stones. Acta Radiol 2000; 41: 269-72.
35. Boraschi P, Neri E, Braccini G et al. Choledocholithiasis: diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography. Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 17: 1245-53.
36. Chan YL, Chan AC, Lam WW et al. Choledocholithiasis: comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 1996; 200: 85-9.
37. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Franklin KJ et al. Evaluation of primary sclerosing cholangitis with magnetic resonance cholangiography: a case control study. Radiology 2000; 215: 71-80.
38. Sica GT, Braver J, Cooney MJ et al. Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatitis. Radiology 1999; 210: 605-10.
39. Manfredi R, Costamagna G, Brizi MG et al. Severe chronic pancreatitis versus suspected-pancreatic disease: dynamic MR cholangiopancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 2000; 214: 849-55.
40. Romijn MG, Stoker J, van Eijck CH et al. MRI with mangafodipir trisodium in the detection and staging of pancreatic cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12: 261-8.
41. Tang Y, Yamashita Y, Arakawa A et al. Pancreaticobiliary ductal system: value of half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement MR cholangiopancreatography for postoperative evaluation. Radiology 2000; 215: 81-8.
42. Sho M, Nakajima Y, Kanehiro H et al. A new evaluation of pancreatic function after pancreatoduodenectomy using secretin magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Am J Surg 1998; 176 279-82.
43. Yeh TS, Jan YY, Tseng JH et al. Malignant perihilar biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography finding. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 432-40.
44. Lopera JE, Soto JA, Munera F et al. Malignant hilar and perihilar biliary obstruction: use of MR cholangiography to define the extent of biliary ductal involvement and plan percutaneous interventions. Radiology 2000; 217: 403-8.
45. Fayad LM, Kowalski T, Mitchell DG. MR cholangiopancreatography: evaluation of common pancreatic diseases. Radiol Clin North Am 2003; 41: 97-114.
46. Adamek HE, Albert J, Breer H et al. Pancreatic cancer detection with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective controlled study. Lancet 2000; 356: 190-3.
47. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Mueller PR et al. State-of-the-art imaging of pancreatic neoplasms. Br J Radiol 2003; 76: 857-65.
48. Dani R, Cundari AM, Nogueira CE et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in cystic lesions of the pancreas. Pancreas 2000; 20: 313-18.
49. Koito K, Namieno T, Ichimura T et al. Mucin-producing tumor pancreatic tumors: comparison of MR cholangiography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1998; 208: 231-7.
50. Romagnuolo J, Bardou M, Rahme E et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary disease. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139: 547-57.
51. Zhong L, Yao QY, Li L et al. Imaging diagnosis of pancreatobiliary diseases: a control study. World J Gastroenterol 2003; 9: 2824-7.
52. Fulcher AS, Turner MA. Pitfalls of MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998; 22 845-50.