Prospects for carbon capture and storage technologies

Annual Review of Environment and Resources

Volumn 29, Issue , 2004, Pages 109-142

  Anderson, Soren ^a   Newell, Richard ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon dioxide; Climate change; Fossil fuel; Sequestration

Indexed keywords

CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE (CCS); INDUSTRIAL SOURCES; SEQUESTRATION;

CARBON DIOXIDE; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FOSSIL FUELS; FREE ENERGY; STORAGE (MATERIALS);

CLIMATE CHANGE;

EID: 10444272536     PISSN: 15435938     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.energy.29.082703.145619     Document Type: Review

References (105)

1. Crowley TJ. 2000. Causes of climate change over the past 100 years. Science 289:270-77
2. Alley RB, Marotzke J, Nordhaus WD, Overpeck JT, Peteet DM, et al. 2003. Abrupt climate change. Science 299:2005-10
3. Karl TR, Trenberth KE. 2003. Modern global climate change. Science 302:1719-23
4. Energy Inf. Adm. 2001. Annual energy review 2000. Rep. DOE/EIA-03842001, US Dep. Energy, Washington, DC
5. US Environ. Prot. Agency. 2002. Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990-2000. Rep. EPA 430-R-02-003, Off. Atmos. Programs, Washington, DC
6. Hansen J. 2002. A brighter future. Clim. Change 52:435-40
7. Hansen J. 2003. Can we defuse the global warming time bomb? Nat. Sci. http://naturalscience.com/ns/articles/01-16/ns_jeh.html
8. Hansen J. 2004. Defusing the global warming time bomb. Sci. Am. 290:68-77
9. 2 from flue gases: commercial trends. Presented at the Can. Soc. Chem. Eng. Annu. Meet. October 4-6, Saskatoon, Sask., Can.
10. Intergov. Panel Clim. Change. 2002. IPCC Workshop on Carbon Capture and Storage Proceedings, Regina, Can. Petten, Neth.: Energy Research Cent. Neth.
11. Riemer P, Audus H, Smith A. 1993. Carbon dioxide capture from power stations. Report SR2P, Int. Energy Agency Greenh. Gas Res. Dev. Program, Cheltenham, UK
12. Adams D, Ormerod W, Riemer P, Smith A. 1994. Carbon dioxide disposal from power stations. Report SR3P, Int. Energy Agency Greenh. Gas Res. Dev. Program, Cheltenham, UK
13. Ishitani H, Johansson TB. 1996. Energy supply mitigation options. In Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change. Work. Group III, Second Assess. Rep. Intergov. Panel dim. Change, ed. RT Watson, MC Zinyowera, RH Moss, pp. 587-647. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
14. Chargin A, Socolow R. 1997. Fuels decar-bonization and carbon sequestration: report of a workshop. Rep. PU/CEES 302, Princeton Univ. Cent. Energy Environ. Stud., Princeton, NJ
15. 2 Capture, Reuse, and Storage Technologies for Mitigating Global Climate Change, Mass. Inst. Technol. Energy Lab., White Pap., Cambridge, MA
16. US Dep. Energy. 1999. Carbon sequestration research and development. Rep. DOE/SC/FE-1, Off. Sci./Off. Fossil Energy, Washington, DC
17. Moomaw WR, Moreira JR. 2001. Technological and economic potential of greenhouse gas emissions reduction. See Ref. 103, pp. 167-299
18. 2 emissions. Science 282:1053-54
19. Herzog HJ. 2000. Capturing greenhouse gases. Sci. Am. 282:72-79
20. Herzog HJ. 2001. What future for carbon capture and sequestration? Environ. Sci. Technol. 37:A148-53
21. Anonymous. 2002. Fired up with ideas. Economist 364 (8280):78-79
22. Krautkraemer J, Toman M. 2003. Fundamental economics of depletable energy supply. Rep. 03-01, Resour. Future, Washington, DC
23. Tahvonen O. 1997. Fossil fuels, stock externalities, and backstop technology. Can. J. Econ. 30:855-74
24. Energy Inf. Adm. 2002. International energy annual 2000. Rep. DOE/EIA-02192000, US Dep. Energy, Washington, DC
25. Watson RT. 2001. Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report. Assess. Rep. Intergov. Panel Clim. Change. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
26. 2 emission. Science 299:2052-54
27. O'Neill BC, Oppenheimer M. 2002. Dangerous climate impacts and the Kyoto Protocol. Science 296:1971-72
28. 2 Separation and Capture Technologies, Work. Pap., Mass. Inst. Technol. Energy Lab.
29. Natl. Energy Technol. Lab., US Dep. Energy. 2003. Carbon sequestration, http://www.netl.doe.gov/coalpower/sequestration/
30. 2 separation and capture. Technology 7:13-23
31. 2 storage: final technical rep. Contract OG/306/98/NO. Statoil/Int. Energy Agency, Cheltenham, UK
32. Energy Inf. Adm., US Dep. Energy. 2002. Natural gas prices by sector, http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/natural_gas/info_ glance/prices.html
33. Energy Inf. Adm. 2003. Annual energy outlook 2003. Rep. DOE/EIA-03832003, US Dep. Energy, Washington, DC
34. Tromp TK, Shia R-L, Allen M, Eiler JM, Yung Y. 2003. Potential environmental impact of a hydrogen economy on the stratosphere. Science 300:1740-42
35. Schultz MG, Diehl T, Brasseur GP, Zittel W. 2003. Air pollution and climateforcing impacts of a global hydrogen economy. Science 302:624-27
36. David J, Herzog HJ. 2000. The cost of carbon capture. See Ref. 104, pp. 985-90
37. Hourcade J-C, Shukla P. 2001. Global, regional, and national costs and ancillary benefits of mitigation. See Ref. 103, pp. 499-559
38. Anderson ST, Newell RG. 2003. Prospects for carbon capture and storage technologies. Resour. Future Discuss. Pap. 02-68. Washington, DC
39. 2 removal. Rep. NW&S-99032, Minist. Econ. Aff., The Hague, Utrecht, Neth.
40. 2 mitigation economics for existing coal-fired power plants. Presented at Pittsburgh Coal Conf., Newcastle, NSW, Aust.
41. Off. Fossil Energy., US Dep. Energy. 2003. Gasification technologies, http://www.fe.doe.gov/programs/powersystems/gasification/
42. 2 using water scrubbing. See Ref. 104, pp. 155-60
43. 2 removal systems for fossil-fuelled power plant processes. Energy Comers. Manag. 38:8173-78
44. Energy Inf. Adm. 2000. Energy-Related Carbon Emissions in Manufacturing 1994. Washington, DC: US Dep. Energy
45. US Environ. Prot. Agency. 1998. Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990-1996. Rep. EPA 236-R-98-006, Off. Policy Plan. Eval., Washington, DC
46. 2 capture and storage. See Ref. 105, pp. 31-52
47. Farla CM, Hendriks CA, Blok K. 1995. Carbon dioxide recovery from industrial processes. Energy Convers. Manag. 36:827-30
48. Hendriks CA, Worrell E, de Jager D, Blok K, Riemer P. 1998. Emission reduction of greenhouse gases from the cement industry. Presented at 4th Int. Conf. Greenh. Gas Control Technol., Aug. 30-Sept. 2, Interlaken, Switz. http://www.ieagreen.org.uk/prghgt42.htm
49. Gale J, Freund P. 2000. Greenhouse gas abatement in energy intensive industries. See Ref. 104, pp. 1211-16
50. 2 capture and storage: the essential bridge to the hydrogen economy. Presented at 6th Int. Conf. Greenh. Gas Control Technol., Oct. 1-4, Kyoto, Jpn
51. Hanisch C. 1998. The pros and cons of carbon dioxide dumping. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32:A20-24
52. Johnson JW. 2000. A solution for carbon dioxide overload. Sci. Technol. Rev. http://www.llnl.gov/str/Johnson.html
53. 2 at Sleipner using time-lapse seismic data. Presented at Eur. Assoc. Geosci. Eng. Annu. Conf. Exhib., Florence, Italy
54. 2 in depleted gas wells and enhanced natural gas recovery. Energy 22:161-68
55. Deleted in proof
56. Audus H, Kaarstad O, Kowal M. 1996. Decarbonisation of fossil fuels: hydrogen as an energy carrier. Presented at World Hydrog. Energy Conf., Stuttgart, Ger.
57. 2 sequestration may benefit upstream industry. Oil Gas J. 98:40-46
58. 2 sequestration in deep coal seams: pilot results and worldwide potential. Presented at 4th Int. Conf. Greenh. Gas Control Technol., Aug. 30-Sept. 2, Interlaken, Switz
59. Benson SM, Hepple R, Apps J, Tsang CF, Lippman M. 2002. Lessons learned from natural and industrial analogues for stor age of carbon dioxide in deep geological formations. Rep. LBNL-5H70, Earth Sci. Div., E.O. Lawrence Berkeley Natl. Lab., Berkeley, CA
60. Johnston P, Santillo D. 2002. Carbon capture and sequestration: potential environmental impacts. See Ref. 105, pp. 95110
61. Johnston P, Santillo D, Stringer R, Parmentier R, Hare B, Krueger M. 1999. Ocean disposal/sequestration of carbon dioxide from fossil fuel production and use: an overview of rationale, techniques and implications. Rep. Tech. Note 01/99, Greenpeace Res. Lab., Amsterdam, Neth.
62. 2 monitoring and storage project. Presented at 6th Int. Conf. Greenh. Gas Control Technol., Oct. 1-4, Kyoto, Jpn
63. 2 in depleted oil and gas fields; global capacity, costs and barriers. See Ref. 104, pp. 278-83
64. 2 storage and sink enhancement options. Rep. DE-FC26-00NT40937, US Dep. Energy/Tenn. Valley Auth. Public Power Inst., Washington, DC
65. 2 storage in the subsurface. Presented at 6th Int. Conf. Greenh. Gas Control Technol., Oct. 1-4, Kyoto, Jpn
66. Winter EM, Bergman PD. 1996. Potential for terrestrial disposal of carbon dioxide in the US. Presented at US/Jpn. Jt. Tech. Workshop, State College, PA
67. Brown K, Jazrawi W, Moberg R, Wilson M. 2001. Role of enhanced oil recovery in carbon sequestration: the Weyburn Monitoring Project, a case study. Presented at 1st Natl. Conf. Carbon Sequestration, Washington, DC
68. Bergman PD, Winter EM. 1996. Disposal of carbon dioxide in deep saline aquifers in the US. Presented at US/Jpn. Jt. Tech. Workshop, State College, PA
69. Davis LA, Graham AL, Parker HW, Ingber MS, Mammoli AA, et al. 2001. Maximizing storage rate and capacity and insuring the environmental integrity of carbon dioxide sequestration in geologic reservoirs. Presented at 1st Natl. Conf. Carbon Sequestration, Washington, DC
70. Off. Fossil Energy, US Dep. Energy. 2002. A climate change solution beneath our feet? http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/press/2002/tl_sequestration_aep.html
71. Karstad O. 2002. Geologic storage, including costs and risks, in saline aquifers. See Ref. 105, pp. 53-60
72. 2-enhanced coal bed methane recovery. http://www.ieagreen.org.uk/ecbm.htm
73. 2 sequestration efficiency from a 3-D ocean model comparison. See Ref. 104, pp. 469-74
74. 2. http://www.ieagreen.org.uk/capture.htm
75. 2 injection on deep-sea biota. Science 294:319-20
76. 2. Science 284:943-45
77. Caldeira K. 2002. Monitoring ocean storage projects. See Ref. 105, pp. 153-60
78. 2 disposal on marine nitrification processes. Presented at 1st Natl. Conf. Carbon Sequestration, Washington, DC
79. 2 emissions to atmosphere. Energy Convers. Manag. 38:8409-14
80. Herzog HJ. 2002. Carbon sequestration via mineral carbonation: overview and assessment. Carbon Sequestration Initiat. Rep. Mass. Inst. Technol., Lab. Energy Environ., Cambridge, MA. http://sequestration.mit.edu/pdfcarbonates.pdf
81. 2 storage. See Ref. 104, pp. 272-77
82. Ormerod W, Riemer P, Smith A. 1995. Carbon dioxide utilisation. IEA GHG Public Summ. Rep. Int. Energy Agency Greenh. Gas Res. Dev. Program, Cheltenham, UK
83. Wilson EJ, Keith DW. 2002. Geologic carbon storage: understanding the rules of the underground. Presented at 6th Int. Conf. Greenh. Gas Control Technol., Oct. 1-4, Kyoto, Jpn
84. 2 sequestration in brine formations. Presented at 1st Natl. Conf. Carbon Sequestration, Washington, DC
85. Reiner DM, Herzog HJ. 2002.A search for regulatory analogs to carbon sequestration. Presented at 6th Int. Conf. Greenh. Gas Control Technol., Oct. 1-4, Kyoto, Jpn
86. Hawkins DG. 2002. Passing gas: policy implications of leakage from geologic carbon storage sites. Presented at 6th Int. Conf. Greenh. Gas Control Technol., Oct. 1-4, Kyoto, Jpn
87. 2 sinks. See Ref. 105, pp. 61-67
88. Benson SM, Myer L. 2002. Monitoring to ensure safe and effective geologic sequestration of carbon dioxide. See Ref. 105, pp. 137-51
89. Herzog HJ, Caldeira K, Reilly J. 2003. An issue of permanence: assessing the effectiveness of temporary carbon storage. dim. Change 59:293-310
90. Muttitt G, Diss B. 2001. Carbon injection: an addict's response to climate change. Ecologist. http://www.theecologist.org/archive_article.html?article=279 91.
91. 2 capture technology for power plant greenhouse gas control. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36:4467-75
92. 2 control options for fossil fuel power plants. Presented at 1st Natl. Conf. Carbon Sequestration, Washington, DC
93. 2 emissions. Carnegie Mellon Ind. Electr. Cent. Work. Pap. CEIC-03-01. Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA
94. McFarland J, Reilly J, Herzog H. 2002. Representing energy technologies in topdown economic models using bottom-up information. Rep. 89. Mass. Inst. Technol. Jt. Program Sci. Policy Glob. Change, Cambridge, MA
95. Edmonds JA, Clarke J, Dooley JJ, Kim SH, Smith S J. 2002. Modeling greenhouse gas energy technology responses to climate change. Presented at 6th Int. Conf. Greenh. Gas Control Technol., Oct. 1-4, Kyoto, Jpn
96. Biggs SD. 2000. Sequestering carbon from power plants: The jury is still out. MS thesis. Mass. Inst. Technol., Cambridge, MA
97. 2 capture and sequestration. See Ref. 104, pp. 973-78
98. McFarland J, Herzog HJ, Reilly J, Jacoby H. 2001. Economic modeling of carbon capture and sequestration technologies. Presented at 1st Natl. Conf. Carbon Sequestration, Washington, DC
99. McFarland J, Herzog H, Reilly J. 2002. Economic modeling of the global adoption of carbon capture and sequestration technologies. Presented at 6th Int. Conf. Greenh. Gas Control Technol., Oct. 1-4, Kyoto, Jpn
100. 2 emissions: assessing the costs of carbon dioxide capture and sequestration in US electricity markets. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 51:1452-59
101. Kim SH, Edmonds JA. 2000. Potential for advanced carbon capture and sequestration technologies in a climate constrained world. Rep. PNNL-13095, Pac. Northwest Natl. Lab., Washington, DC
102. 2: what's known, where are the gaps and what more needs to be done. Presented at 6th Int. Conf. Greenh. Gas Control Technol., Oct. 1-4, Kyoto, Jpn
103. Metz B, Davidson O, Swart R, Pan J, eds. Climate change 2001: mitigation. Working Group III, Third Assess. Rep. Intergovern. Panel Clim. Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
104. Williams D, Durie B, McMullan P, Paulson D, Smith A, eds. 2000. Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Greenh. Gas Control Technol., Cairns, Aust. North Ryde, N. S. W: Commonw. Sci. Ind. Res. Organ.
105. Intergov. Panel Clim. Change 2002. Workshop carbon capture storage. Proc. Intergov. Panel Clim. Change. Regina, Can. Petten, Neth.: Energy Res. Cent. Neth.