Strategic aspirations for net-enabled business

European Journal of Information Systems

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 273-285

  Hackbarth, Gary ^a   Kettinger, William J ^b  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic capabilities; Electronic commerce; Incremental strategy; Integration; Leapfrogging strategy; NEBIC; Net enablement; Organizational readiness

Indexed keywords

EID: 10444266004     PISSN: 0960085X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000511     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. ASH CG and BURN JM (2003) Assessing the benefits from e-business transformation through effective enterprise management. European Journal of Information Systems 12, 297-308.
2. BATE P, KHAN R and PYE A (2000) Towards a culturally sensitive approach to organization structuring: where organization design meets organization development. Organizational Science 11(2), 197.
3. BOONSTRA A (2003) Structure and analysis of IS decision-making. European Journal of Information Systems 12, 195-209.
4. CALDEIRA MM and WARD JM (2003) Using resource-based theory to interpret the successful adoption and use of information systems and technology in manufacturing small and medium-enterprises. European Journal of Information Systems 12, 127-141.
5. CHANDLER Jr AD (1991) The functions of the HQ unit in the multibusiness firm. Strategic Management Journal 12(Winter), 31-50.
6. CHATTERJEE D, GREWAL R and SAMBAMURTHY V (2002) Shaping up for e-commerce: institutional enablers of the organizational assimilation of web technologies. MIS Quarterly 26(2), 65-89.
7. CHO D-S, KIM D-J and RHEE DK (1998) Latecomer strategies: evidence from the semiconductor industry in Japan and Korea. Organization Science 9(4), 489-505.
8. COLLIS DJ (1994) How valuable are research capabilities? Strategic Management Journal 15(Winter), 143-152.
9. DAMANPOUR F (1987) The adoption of technological, administrative and ancillary innovations: impact of organizational factors. Journal of Management 13(4), 675-688.
10. DANIEL EM and WILSON HN (2003) The role of dynamic capabilities in e-business transformation. European Journal of Information Systems 12, 282-296.
11. DANNEELS E (2002) The Dynamics of Product Innovation and Firm Competencies. Strategic Management Journal 23, 1025-1121.
12. DAVENPORT TH (1993) Process Innovation: Reengineering Work through Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
13. DAVENPORT TH and STODDARD DB (1994) Reengineering: business change of mythic proportions? MIS Quarterly 18(2), 121-127.
14. DAVENPORT T (2002) Enterprise IT at the Crossroads. CIO Magazine.
15. EISENHARDT KM and MARTIN JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal 21, 1105-1121.
16. FARBEY B, LAND F and TARGET D (1995) A taxonomy of information system applications: the benefits' evaluation ladder. European Journal of Information Systems 4(1), 42-50.
17. FINK Dieter (1998) Guidelines for the successful adoption of information technology in small and medium enterprises. International Journal of Information Management 18(4), 243-253.
18. GEBAUER J and SCHARL A (1999) Between flexibility and automation: an evaluation of web technology from a business process perspective. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 5(2), 193-210.
19. HEINE ML, GROVER V and MALHOTRA MK (2003) The relationship between technology and performance: a meta-analysis of technology models. Omega 31, 189-204.
20. HELFAT CE and PETERAF MA (2003) The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal 24, 997-1010.
21. JOHNSTON HR and CARRICO SR (1988) Developing capabilities to use information strategically. MIS Quarterly 12(1), 37-48.
22. KETTINGER WJ and GROVER V (1995) Towards a theory of business process change management, Journal of Management Information Systems 12(1), 9-30.
23. KETTINGER WJ and HACKBARTH G (2000) Reaching the next level in e-commerce. In Mastering Information Management (MARCHAND DA, DAVENPORT TH, and DICKSON T, Eds), pp 222-227, London, Prentice-Hall, Financial Times.
24. KETTINGER WJ and TENG JTC (1998) Aligning BPR to strategy: a framework for analysis. Long Range Planning 31(1), 93-107.
25. KETTINGER WJ, TENG TC and GUHA S (1997) Business process change: a study of methodologies, techniques and tools. MIS Quarterly 21(1), 55-80.
26. LINT O and PENNINGS E (1999) Finance and strategy: time-to-wait or time-to-market? Long Range Planning 32(5), 483-493.
27. MINTZBERG H (1973) The Nature of Managerial Work. Harper & Row, New York.
28. MUSTONEN-OLLILA E and LYYTINEN K (2003) How organizations adopt information system process innovations: a longitudinal analysis. European Journal of Information Systems 13, 35-51.
29. PARKER CP, DIPBOYE RL and JACKSON SL (1995) Perceptions of organizational politics: an investigation of antecedents and consequences. Journal of Management 21 (5), 891-912.
30. PORTER ME (1980) Competitive Strategy. Free Press, New York.
31. PORTER ME (1985) Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press Collier Macmillan, New York, pp xviii, 557.
32. PORTER ME (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review 68(2), 73-93.
33. RINDOVA VP and KOTHA S (2001) Continuous 'morphing': competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. Academy of Management Journal 44(6), 1263-1280.
34. SAMBAMURTHY V, BHARADWAJ A and GROVER V (2003) Shaping agility through digital options: reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly 27(2), 237-263.
35. SAWY OAEI (1985) Implementation by cultural infusion: an approach for managing the introduction of information technologies. MIS Quarterly 9(2), 131-141.
36. SCHEER AW and HABERMANN F (2000) Making ERP a success. Association for Computing Machinery. Communications of the ACM 43(4), 57.
37. STEINER GA (1979) Strategic Planning: What Every Manager Must Know. New York Free Press, New York.
38. STRAUB Detmar and WATSON Rick (2001) Transformational issues in researching IS and Net-enabled Organizations. Information Systems Research 12(4), 337-345.
39. TEECE DJ, PISANO G and SHUEN A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18(7), 509-533.
40. TEO HH, WEI KK and BENBASAT I (2003) Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: an institutional perspective. MIS Quarterly 27(1), 19-49.
41. VENKATRAMAN N (1994) IT-enabled business transformation: From automation to business scope redefinition. Sloan Management Review 35(2), 73-87.
42. WHEELER BC (2002) NEBIC: a dynamic capabilities theory for assessing net-enablement. Information Systems Research 13(2), 125-146.
43. WIGAND RT (1995) Electronic commerce and reduced transaction costs: firms' migration into highly interconnected electronic markets. International Journal of Electronic Markets 5(3), 1-5.
44. WILLIAMS ML (2002) Identifying the organizational routines in NEBIC theory's choosing capability. 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, Honolulu, Hawaii.
45. WINTER SG (2003) Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 24, 991-995.
46. YETTON Philip W, KIM D Johnston and JANE F Craig (1994) Computer-aided architects: a case study of IT and strategic change. Sloan Management Review 35(4), 57-67.
47. ZAHRA SA and GEORGE G (2002a) Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review 27(2), 185-188.
48. ZAHRA SA and GEORGE G (2002b) The net-enabled business innovation cycle and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Information Systems Research 13(2), 147-150.
49. ZHU K, KRAEMER K and XU S (2003) Electronic business adoption by European firms: a cross-country assessment of facilitators and inhibitors. European Journal of Information Systems 12, 251-268.
50. ZOLLO M and WINTER SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organizational Science 13(3), 339-351.
51. ZOTT C (2003) Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intraindustry differential firm performance: insights from a simulation study. Strategic Management Journal 24, 97-125.