Identifying the organizational in NEBIC theory's choosing capability

Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages

  Williams, M L ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS INNOVATION; BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION THEORY; EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; INSTITUTIONAL THEORY; INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT; THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS;

COMPETITION;

EID: 84969508852     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174567     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Wheeler, B.C., NeBIC: a dynamic capability series for assessing net-enablement. Information Systems Research, 2002. 13(2): p. 125-146.
2. Daft, R.L., A Dual-Core Model of Organizational Innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 1978. 21(2): p. 193-210.
3. Damanpour, F., The adoption of technological, administrative, and ancillary innovations impact of organizational factors. Journal of Management, 1987. 13: p. 675-688.
4. Damanpour, F., Organizational Innovation - a Meta-analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 1991. 34(3): p. 555-590.
5. Damanpour, F. and W.M. Evan, Organizational Innovation and Performance: The Problem of 'Organizational Lag'. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1984. 29(3): p. 392-409.
6. Dewar, R.D. and I.E. Dutton, The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: an empirical analysis. Management Science, 1986. 32: p. 1422-1433.
7. Ettlie, J.E., W.P. Bridges, and R.D. O'Keefe, organization strategy and structural differences for radical vs. incremental innovation. Management Science, 1984. 30: p. 682-695.
8. Byrd, T.A. and D.E. Turner, An exploratory examination of the relationship between flexible IT infrastructure and competitive advantage. Information & Management, 2001. 39(1): p. 41-52.
9. Bolton, M.K., Organizational Innovation and Substandard Performance - When Is Necessity the Mother of Innovation. Organization Science, 1993. 4(1): p. 57-75.
10. Becker, S.W. and T.L. Whisler, The Innovative Organization: A Selective View of Current Theory and Research. Journal of Business, 1967. 40: p. 462-469.
11. Fichman, R.G. and C.F. Kemerer, The illusory diffusion of innovation: An examination of assimilation gaps. Information Systems Research, 1999. 10(3): p. 255-275.
12. Fichman, R.G. and C.F. Kemerer, The assimilation of software process innovations: An organizational learning perspective. Management Science, 1997. 43(10): p. 1345-1363.
13. Grover, V., An extension of the tri-core model of information systems innovation: strategic and technological moderators. European Journal of Information Systems, 1997. 6(4): p. 232-242.
14. Grover, V., K. Fiedler, and J. Teng, Emperical Evidence on Swanson's Tri-Core Model of Information Systems Innovation. Information Systems Research, 1997. 8(3): p. 273-287.
15. Kimberly, J.R. and M. Evanisko, Organizational Innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 1981. 24: p. 689-713.
16. Land, F., The first business computer: A case study in user-driven innovation. Ieee Annals of the History of Computing, 2000. 22(3): p. 16-26.
17. Prescott, M.B. and S.A. Conger, Information Technology Innovations - a Classification by It Locus of Impact and Research Approach. Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 1995. 26(2-3): p. 20-41.
18. Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of Innovations. Third ed. 1983, New York: Free Press.
19. Subramanian, A. and S. Nilakanta, Organizational innovativeness: Exploring the relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures of organizational performance. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 1996. 24(6): p. 631-647.
20. Swanson, E.B. and N.C. Ramiller, The Organizing Vision in Information Systems Innovation. Organization Science, 1997. 8(5): p. 458-474.
21. Swanson, E.B., Information Systems Innovation Among Organizations. Management Science, 1994. 40(9): p. 1069-1092.
22. Griffith, T.L., Technology features as triggers for sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 1999. 24(3): p. 472-488.
23. Teece, D.J., G. Pisano, and A. Shuen, Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 1997. 18(7): p. 509-533.
24. Eisenhardt, K.M. and J.A. Martin, Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 2000. 21(10/11): p. 1105-1121.
25. DiMaggio, P. and W.W. Powell, The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 1983. 48th press: p. 147-160.
26. Fichman, R.G. Information Technology Diffusion: A Review of Empirical Research. in 13th Annual Internation Conferenence on Information Systems. 1992. Dallas, TX.
27. Rogers, E.M. and F.F. Shoemaker, Communication of Innovations. 1971, New York: Free Press.
28. King, J.L., et al., Institutional factors in information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 1994. 2(4): p. 139-169.
29. Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed. 1995, New York: Free Press.
30. Van de Ven, A.H., Managing the process of organizational innovation, in Changing and Redesigning Organizations, G.P. Huber, Editor. 1991, Oxford University Press: New York.
31. Kwon, T.H. and R.W. Zmud, Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation, in Critical Issues and Information Systems Research, J.R. Boland and R. Hirschheim, Editors. 1987, John Wiley: New York. p. 227-251.
32. Robertson, T.S. and H. Gatignon, Competitive effects on technology diffusion. Journal of Marketing, 1986. 50: p. 1-12.
33. Pinch, T.J. and W.E. Bijker, The social construction of facts and artifacts: or how the sociology of science and sociology of technology might benefit each other, in The Social Construction of Technological Systems, W.E. Bijker, T.P. Hughes, and T.J. Pinch, Editors. 1987, MIT Press: Cambridge. p. 17-50.
34. Hughes, T.P., The evolution of large technological systems, in The Social Construction of Technological Systems, W.E. Bijker, T.P. Hughes, and T.J. Pinch, Editors. 1987, MIT Press: Cambridge. p. 51-82.
35. Iwata, E., Silicon Valley techies suit up Army with sleeker gear, in USAToday. 2002: Washington, DC.