Educational research and the problems of practice

Irish Educational Studies

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 29-40

  Kelly, Anthony E ^a   Sloane, Finbarr C ^b  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b National Science Foundation   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1042265352     PISSN: 03323315     EISSN: 17474965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0332331030220106     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. For a review of the Tooley report, see http://www.ioe.ac.uk/hgpersonal/toolev‐darbv‐critique.pdf and http://www.1eeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/000000976.htm (http://www.ioe.ac.uk/hgpersonal/toolev‐darbv‐critique.pdf and http://www.1eeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/000000976.htm)
2. See the following web sites http://edworkforce.house.gov/hearings/107th/edr/oeri71701/w171701.htm and http://www.stanford.edu/∼hakuta/ed_res_pol/ (http://edworkforce.house.gov/hearings/107th/edr/oeri71701/w171701.htm and http://www.stanford.edu/∼hakuta/ed_res_pol/)
3. See, for example, http://www.rnpiwg‐berlin.mpg.de/DISCOVERY (http://www.rnpiwg‐berlin.mpg.de/DISCOVERY)
4. Bannan‐Ritland, B., 2003. The role of design in research: The Integrative Learning Design framework. Educational Researcher, 32 (1): 21–24. available on line at rhttp://aera.net/Dubs/er/pdf/vo132_01/AERA320108.pdf]
5. Barone, T., 2001. Science, art and the predispositions of educational researchers. Educational Researcher, 30 (7): 24–28.
6. Brown, A. L., 1992. Design Experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2 (1): 141–178.
7. Cobb, P., 2001. “ Supporting the improvement of learning and teaching in social and institutional context ”. In Cognition and Instruction: 25 years of progress, Edited by: Carver, S., and Klahr, D., 455–478. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Collins, A., 1992. “ Toward a design science of education ”. In New directions in educational technology, Edited by: Scanlon, E., and O'Shea, T., 15–22. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
9. Edelson, D., 2002. Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11 (1): 105–121.
10. Feyerabend, P., 1993. Against method, 3rd ed., London: Verso.
11. Holton, G., 1998. The advancement of science, and its burdens, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Holton, G., 1993. Science and anti‐science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Jacob, E., and White, C. S., 2002. Theme issue on scientific research in education. Educational Researcher, 31 (8)
14. Kaestle, C., 1993. The awful reputation of educational research. Educational Researcher, 22 (1): 23–31.
15. Kaestle, C., 1997. Improving the awful reputation of educational research. Educational Researcher, 26 (7): 26–28.
16. Kelly, A. E., 2003. Theme Issue: The Role of Design in Educational Research. Guest editor. Educational Researcher, 32 (1) available on line at http://aera.net/pubs/er/eronline.htm
17. Kelly, A. E., and Lesh, R. A., 2000. Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education., Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
18. Lagemann, E. C., 1997. Contested terrain: A history of education and the United States, 1890–1990. Educational Researcher, 26 (9): 5–17.
19. Lagemann, E. C., 2000. An elusive science: The troubling history of education research, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Lagemann, E. C., and Shulman, L. S., eds. 1999. Issues in education research: Problems and possibilities, San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass.
21. Lewis, C., 2002. Lesson Study: A Handbook of Teacher‐Led Instructional Change, Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools. http://www.rbs.org/catalog/pubs/pd55.shtml
22. Mayer, R. E., 2000. What is the place of science in educational research?. Educational Researcher, 29 (6): 38–39.
23. Mayer, R. E., 2001. Resisting the assault on science: The case for evidence‐based reasoning in educational research. Educational Researcher, 30 (7): 29–30.
24. National Research Council. 2002. Scientific research in education, Committee on Scientific Principles for Educational Research Edited by: Shavelson, R. J., and Towne, L., Washington DC: National Academy Press.
25. Shavelson, R. J., Phillips, D. C., Towne, L., and Feuer, M. J., 2003. On the science of education design studies. Educational Researcher, 32 (1): 25–28. [http://aera.net/pubs/er/pdf/vol32_01/AERA320109.pdf]
26. Simon, H. A., 2001. “ Chapter 1: Seek and ye shall find ”. In Designing for science: Implications from everyday, classroom, and professional settings, Edited by: Crowley, K., Schunn, C., and Okada, T., 5–20. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Sloane, F. C., and Gorard, S., 2003. Exploring modeling aspects of design experiments. Educational Researcher, 32 (1): 29–31. Available on line at [http://aera.net/pubs/er/pdf/vol32_01/AERA320110.pdf]
28. Stone, J. E., 2001. Comment on “An open letter to Reid Lyon” by Steven L. Strauss. Educational Researcher, 30 (7): 31–32.
29. Strauss, S. L., 2001. Methodology, medical metaphors, and mental health: A reply to J. E. Stone. Educational Researcher, 30 (7): 32–33.
30. Sugrue, C., and Uí Thuama, C., 1994. Perspectives on substance and method in post‐graduate educational research in Ireland. Irish Educational Studies, 13: 102–129.
31. Van den Akker, J., 1999. “ Principles and methods of development research ”. In Design approaches and tools in education and training, Edited by: van den Akker, J., Branch, R. M., Gustafson, K., Nieveen, N., and Plomp, T., 1–14. Boston: Kluwer Academic. available on line at http://proiects.edte.utwente.nl/smarternet/version2/cabinet/icodesign_principles.pdf
32. Zaritsky, R., Kelly, A. E., Flowers, W., Rogers, E., and O'Neill, P., 2003. Clinical design sciences: A view from sister design efforts. Educational Researcher, 32 (1): 32–34.