Should there be a romance between teams and groups?

Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

Volumn 77, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 475-480

  Paulus, Paul B ^a   Van Der Zee, Karen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 10244230991     PISSN: 09631798     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/0963179042596496     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Allen, N. J., & Hecht, T. D. (2004). The 'romance of teams': Toward an understanding of its psychological underpinnings and implications. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 439-461.
2. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer.
3. Anderson, C. A., Lindsay, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (1999). Research in the psychological laboratory: Truth or triviality? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 3-9.
4. Baron, R. S., & Kerr, N. L. (2003). Group process, group decision, group action (2nd ed.). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
5. Brauer, M., & Judd, C. M. (1996). Group polarization and repeated attitude expressions: A new take on an old topic. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology, Volume 7 (pp. 173-207). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
6. Brown, V. R., & Paulus, P. B. (2002). Making group brainstorming more effective: Recommendations from an associative memory perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 208-212.
7. Buys, C. J. (1978). Humans could do better without groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 123-125.
8. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1998). Team performance and training in complex environments: Recent findings from applied research. Current Directions in Pychological Science, 7, 83-87.
9. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509.
10. Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 461-493). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
11. Ellis, A. P. J., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Porter, C. O. L. H., West, B. J., & Moon, H. (2003). Team learning: Collectively connecting the dots. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 821-835.
12. Furnham, A. (2000). The brainstorming myth. Business Strategy Review, 11, 21-28.
13. Hackman, J. R. (1998). Why teams don't work. In R. S. Tindale & L. Heath (Eds.), Theory and research on small groups (pp. 245-267). New York: Plenum Press.
14. Janis, I., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press.
15. Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.
16. Kayser, T. A. (1994). Building team power: How to unleash the collaborative genius of work teams. New York: Irwin.
17. Laughlin, P. R., Bonner, B. L., & Miner, A. G. (2002). Groups perform better than the best individuals on letter-to-numbers problems. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 605-620.
18. McGrath, J. (1997). Small group research, that once and future field. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 7-27.
19. Moreland, R. L., Argote, L., Krishnan, R. (1996). Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What's so social about social cognition? Social cognition research in small groups (pp. 57-84). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Mullen, B., Driskell, J. E., & Salas, E. (1998). Meta-analysis and the study of group dynamics. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, 213-229.
21. Paulus, P. B., & Brown, V. (2003). Ideational creativity in groups: Lessons from research on brainstorming. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 110-136). New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Paulus, P. B., Dugosh, K. L., Dzindolet, M. T., Coskun, H., & Putman, V. L. (2002). Social and cognitive influences in group brainstorming. Predicting production gains and losses. European Review of Social Psychology, Volume 12 (pp. 299-325). Chichester, John Wiley.
23. Paulus, P. B., Dzindolet, M. T., Poletes, G., & Camacho, L. M. (1993). Perception of performance in group brainstorming: The illusion of group productivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 78-89.
24. Paulus, P. B., Larey, T. S., & Ortega, A. H. (1995). Performance and perceptions of brainstormers in an organizational setting. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 249-265.
25. Paulus, P. B., Nakui, T., & Putman, V. L. (in press). Group brainstorming, meetings, and team-work: Some rules for the road to innovation. In L. Thompson & H. Choi (Eds.), Creativity and innovations in organizational teams. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Paulus, P. B., & Nijstad, B. (Eds.). (2003). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Shepperd, J. A. (1993). Productivity loss in performance groups: A motivation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 67-81.
28. Stasser, G., & Birchmeier, Z. (2003). Group creativity and collective choice. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 85-109). New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Sutton, R. I., & Hargadon, A. (1996). Brainstorming groups in context. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 685-718.
30. Wittenbaum, G. M., & Park, E. S. (2001). The collective preference for shared information. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 70-73.
31. Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323-345.