Face-space-R: Towards a unified account of face recognition

Visual Cognition

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 29-69

  Lewis, Michael B ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FACE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RACE; REVIEW; VISUAL MEMORY;

EID: 0942298960     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280344000194     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Benson, P. J., & Perrett, D. I. (1991). Perception and recognition of photographic quality facial caricature: Implications for the recognition of natural images. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 3, 105-135.
2. Benson, P. J., & Perrett, D. I. (1994). Visual processing of facial distinctiveness. Perception, 23, 75-93.
3. Blough, D. S. (1975). Steady state data and a quantitative model of operant generalization and discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 104, 3-21.
4. Bothwell, R. W., Brigham, J. C., & Malpass, R. S. (1989). Cross-racial identification of faces. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 19-25.
5. Brennan, S. E. (1985). The caricature generator. Leonardo, 18, 170-178.
6. Burton, A. M., Bruce, V., & Dench, N. (1994). What's distinctive about a distinctive face. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 119-141.
7. Burton, A. M., Bruce, V., & Hancock P. J. B. (1999). From pixels to people: A model of familiar face recognition. Cognitive Science, 23, 1-31.
8. Burton, A. M., Bruce, V., & Johnston, R. A. (1990). Understanding face recognition with an interactive activation model. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 361-380.
9. Burton, A. M., & Vokey, J. R. (1998). The face-space typicality paradox: Understanding the face-space metaphor. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 475-483.
10. Busey, T. A., & Tunnicliff, J. L. (1999). Accounts of blending, distinctiveness and typicality in the false recognition of faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1210-1235.
11. Byatt, G., & Rhodes, G. (1998). Recognition of own-race and other-race caricatures: Implications for models of face recognition. Vision Research, 38, 2455-2468.
12. Carey, S. (1992). On becoming a face expert. In V. Bruce, A. Cowey, A. W. Ellis, & D. J. Perrett (Eds.), Processing the facial image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Craw, I. (1995). A manifold model of face and object recognition. In T. Valentine (Ed.), Cognitive and computation aspects of face processing. London: Routledge.
14. Fortune, S. (1992). Voronoi diagrams and Delauney triangulations. In D. Z. Du & F. K. Hwang (Eds.), Computing in Euclidean geometry. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.
15. Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. E. (1980). Memory for faces and schema theory. Journal of Psychology, 105, 47-59.
16. Hancock, P. J. B. (2000). Evolving faces from principal components. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 32(2), 327-333.
17. Hancock, P. J. B., Burton, A. M., & Bruce, V. (1996). Face processing: Human perception and principal components analysis. Memory and Cognition, 24, 26-40.
18. Johnston, R. A., & Ellis, H. D. (1995). Age effects in the processing of typical and distinctive faces. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 447-465.
19. Jones, F. W., Wills, A. J., & McLaren, I. P. L. (1998). Perceptual categorisation: Connectionist modelling and decision rules. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51B, 33-58.
20. Lee, K. L., Byatt, G., & Rhodes, G. (2000). Caricature effects, distinctiveness and identification: Testing the face-space framework. Psychological Science, 11, 379-385.
21. Lee, K. L., & Perrett, D. (1997). Presentation-time measures of the effect of manipulations in colour space on discrimination of famous faces. Perception, 26, 733-752.
22. Lee, K. L., & Perrett, D. (2000). Manipulation of colour and shape information and its consequence upon recognition and best-likeness judgements. Perception, 29, 1291-1312.
23. Lewis, M. B. (1997). A computational and empirical investigation into face-space. Unpublished PhD thesis, Cardiff University, UK.
24. Lewis, M. B. (1999). Age of acquisition in face categorisation: Is there an instance-based account? Cognition, 71, B23-B39.
25. Lewis, M. B., & Johnston, R. A. (1997). Familiarity, target set and false positive in face recognition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 437-459.
26. Lewis, M. B., & Johnston, R. A. (1998). Understanding caricatures of faces. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 321-346.
27. Lewis, M. B., & Johnston, R. A. (1999a). A unified account of the effect of caricaturing faces. Visual Cognition, 6, 1-42.
28. Lewis, M. B., & Johnston, R. A. (1999b). Are caricatures special? Evidence of peak-shift in face recognition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 105-117.
29. Light, L. L., Kayra-Stuart, F., & Hollander, S. (1979). Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Memory, Learning, and Cognition, 5, 212-228.
30. Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity and the identification-categorisation relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57.
31. Nosofsky, R. M. (1991). Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 3-27.
32. Purtle, R. B. (1973). Peak shift: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 408-421.
33. Reed, S. K. (1972). Pattern recognition and categorization. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 382-407.
34. Rhodes, G. (1988). Looking at faces: First-order and second-order features as determinants of facial appearance. Perception, 17, 48-63.
35. Rhodes, G. (1996). Superportraits: Caricatures and recognition. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
36. Rhodes, G., Brennan, S., & Carey, S. (1987). Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representations. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 473-497.
37. Rhodes, G., Carey, S., Byatt, G., & Proffitt, F. (1998). Coding spatial variations in faces and simple shapes: A test of two models. Vision Research, 38, 2307-2321.
38. Rhodes, G., & Tremewan, T. (1994). Understanding face recognition: Caricature effects, inversion and the homogeneity problem. Visual Cognition, 1, 275-311.
39. Shepherd, J. W., Ellis, H. D., & Davis, G. M. (1977). Perceiving and remembering faces [Report Pol/73/1675/24/1]. London: Home Office.
40. Shin, H. J., & Nosofsky, R. M. (1992). Similarity-scaling studies of dot-pattern classification and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 278-304.
41. Spence, K. W. (1936). The nature of discrimination learning in animals. Psychological Review, 43, 427-449.
42. Spence, K. W. (1937). The differential response in animals to stimuli varying within a single dimension. Psychological Review, 44, 430-444.
43. Stevenage, S. V. (1995). Can caricatures really produce distinctiveness effects? British Journal of Psychology, 86, 127-147.
44. Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 225-246.
45. Thomas, D. R., Mood, K., Morrison, S., & Wiertelak, E. (1991). Peak shift revisited: A test of alternative interpretations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 130-140.
46. Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgement. Psychological Review, 34, 273-386.
47. Turk, M., & Pentland, A. (1991). Eigenfaces for recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 71-86.
48. Valentine, T. ( 1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161-204.
49. Valentine, T. (2001). Face-space models of face recognition. In M. J. Wenger & J. T. Townsend (Eds.), Computational geometric and process perspectives on facial cognition: Contexts and challenges (pp. 83-113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
50. Valentine, T., & Bruce, V. (1986). The effects of distinctiveness in recognising and classifying faces. Perception, 15, 525-535.
51. Valentine, T., Chiroro, P., & Dixon, R. (1995). An account of the own-race bias and the contact hypothesis based on a "face space" model of face recognition. In T. Valentine (Ed.), Cognitive and computational aspects of face recognition. London: Routledge.
52. Valentine, T., & Endo, M. (1992). Towards an exemplar model of face processing: The effects of race and distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 671-703.
53. Valentine, T., & Ferrara, A. (1991). Typicality in categorisation, recognition and identification: Evidence from face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 82, 87-102.
54. Vernon, M. D. (1955). The function of schemata in perceiving. Psychological Review, 62, 180-192.
55. Wills, A. J., & McLaren, I. P. L. (1997). Generalization in human category learning: A connectionist explanation of differences in gradient discrimination and non-discrminative learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50B, 607-630.
56. Wills, A. J., & McLaren, I. P. L. (1998). Perceptual learning and free classification. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51B, 235-270.
57. Wills, A. J., Reimers, S., Stewart, N., Suret, M., & McLaren, I. P. L. (2000). Tests of the ratio rule in categorisation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 983-1011.
58. Zaki, S. R., & Nosofsky, R. M. (2001). Exemplar accounts of blending and distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1022-1041.