A Research Note Regarding the Development of the Consensus on Appropriation Scale

Information Systems Research

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 356-359

  Allport, Christopher D ^a   Kerler III, William A ^a  

^a PAMPLIN COLLEGE OF BUSINESS   (United States)

Author keywords

Consensus on Appropriation; Framing; Multidimensionality; Scale Development

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DATA PROCESSING; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES; PROBLEM SOLVING;

CONSENSUS ON APPROPRIATION; FRAMING; MULTIDIMENSIONALITY; SCALE DEVELOPMENT;

PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 0942289971     PISSN: 10477047     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/isre.14.4.356.24903     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Davis, M. A., P. Bobko. 1986. Contextual effects on escalation processes in public sector decision making. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes 37(1) 121-138.
2. Fagley, N. S., P. M. Miller. 1987. The effects of decision framing on choice of risky vs. certain options. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes 39(2) 264-277.
3. Kuhberger, A. 1995. The framing of decisions: A new look at old problems. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes 62(2) 230-240.
4. _. 1998. The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes 75(1) 23-55.
5. Levin, I. P., S. L. Schneider, G. J. Gaeth. 1998. All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes 76(2) 149-188.
6. Lewicki, R. J., D. J. MCAllister, R. J. Bies. 1998. Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3) 438-458.
7. Miller, P. M., N. S. Fagley. 1991. The effects of framing, problem variations, and providing rationale on choice. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 17(5) 517-522.
8. Moore, G. C., I. Benbasat. 1991. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Systems Res. 2(3) 192-222.
9. Poole, M. S., G. DeSanctis. 1990. Understand the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. J. Fulk, C. Steinfield, eds. Organizations and Communication Technology. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 173-193.
10. _, _. 1992. Microlevel structuration in computer-supported group decision making. Human Comm. Res. 19(1) 5-49.
11. Salisbury, W. D., W. W. Chin, A. Gopal, P. R. Newsted. 2002. Research report: Better theory through measurement - Developing a scale to capture consensus on appropriation. Inform. Systems Res. 13(1) 91-103.
12. Tversky, A., D. Kahneman. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Sci. 211(4481) 453-458.
13. Wrightsman, L. S. 1991. Interpersonal trust and attitudes toward human nature. J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, L. S. Wrightsman, eds. Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes: Volume 1 - Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 373-412.