One-shot view invariance in a moving world

Psychological Science

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 461-466

  Kourtzi, Zoe ^a   Shiffrar, Maggie ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347934810     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00462.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P.C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
2. Bülthoff, H.H., & Edelman, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a 2-D view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 89, 60-64.
3. Edelman, S., & Weinshall, D. (1991). A self-organizing multiple view representation of 3D objects. Biological Cybernetics, 64, 209-219.
4. Freyd, J.J. (1987). Dynamic mental representations. Psychological Review, 94, 427-438.
5. Hummel, J.E., & Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480-517.
6. Jolicoeur, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289-303.
7. Jolicoeur, P. (1988). Mental rotation and the identification of disoriented objects. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 461-478.
8. Jolicoeur, P. (1990). Identification of disoriented objects: A dual-systems theory. Mind & Language, 5, 387-410.
9. Jolicoeur, P., & Landau, M.J. (1984). Effects of rotation in the identification of similar visual patterns. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 38, 80-93.
10. Koriat, A., & Norman, J. (1988). Frames and images: Sequential effects in mental rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 93-111.
11. Koriat, A., & Norman, J. (1989). Establishing global and local correspondence between successive stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 480-495.
12. Logothetis, N., Pauls, J., Bülthoff, H.H., & Poggio, T. (1994). View-dependent object recognition by monkeys. Current Biology, 4, 401-414.
13. Logothetis, N., Pauls, J., & Poggio, T. (1995). Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys. Current Biology, 5, 552-563.
14. Marr, D., & Nishihara, H.K. (1978). Representation and recognition of three-dimensional shapes. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 200, 269-294.
15. Palmer, S., Rosch, E., & Chase, P. (1981). Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 135-151). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Poggio, T., & Edelman, S. (1990). A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature, 343, 263-266.
17. Rock, I., DiVita, J., & Barbeito, R. (1981). The effect on form perception of change of orientation in the third dimension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 719-732.
18. Sekuler, A.B., & Palmer, S.E. (1992). Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 95-111.
19. Shepard, R.N., & Cooper, L.A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Shepard, R.N., & Judd, S.A. (1976). Perceptual illusions of rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 191, 952-954.
21. Shepard, R.N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
22. Shepard, R.N., & Zare, S. (1983). Path-guided apparent motion. Science, 220, 632-634.
23. Shepard, S., & Metzler, D. (1988). Mental rotation: Effects of dimensionality of objects and type of task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 3-11.
24. Tarr, M.J., & Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-282.
25. Tarr, M.J., & Pinker, S. (1990). When does human object recognition use a viewer-centered reference framed? Psychological Science, 1, 253-256.
26. Ungerleider, L.G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D.G. Ingle, M.A. Goodale, & R.J.W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behaviour (pp. 549-586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.