Sensitization of Psychomotor Stimulation and Conditioned Reward in Mice: Differential Modulation by Contextual Learning

Neuropsychopharmacology

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 249-258

  Mead, Andy N ^a,b   Crombag, Hans S ^a,c   Rocha, Beatriz A ^a,d  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Amphetamine; Conditioning; Cues; Drug addiction; Locomotor activity; Reinforcer

Indexed keywords

AMPHETAMINE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG POTENCY; DRUG RESPONSE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EXPERIMENTAL TEST; LEARNING; LOCOMOTION; MILK; MOUSE; NEUROMODULATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMOTOR ACTIVITY; REWARD; SENSITIZATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; CUES; DEXTROAMPHETAMINE; DOPAMINE AGENTS; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REWARD;

EID: 0842286595     PISSN: 0893133X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300294     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Anagnostaras SG, Robinson TE (1996). Sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant effects of amphetamine: modulation by associative learning. Behav Neurosci 110: 1397-1414.
2. Arroyo M, Markou A, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (1998). Acquisition, maintenance and reinstatement of intravenous cocaine self-administration under a second-order schedule of reinforcement in rats: effects of conditioned cues and continuous access to cocaine. Psychopharmacology 140: 331-344.
3. Badiani A, Anagnostaras SG, Robinson TE (1995). The development of sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant effects of amphetamine is enhanced in a novel environment. Psychopharmacology 117: 443-452.
4. Battisti JJ, Chang CH, Uretsky NJ, Wallace LJ (1999). Sensitization of stereotyped behavior to amphetamine is context and response dependent. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 63: 263-269.
5. Baunez C, Amalric M, Robbins TW (2002). Enhanced food-related motivation after bilateral lesions of the subthalamic nucleus. J Neurosci 22: 562-568.
6. Bjijou Y, De Deurwaerdere P, Spampinato U, Stinus L, Cador M (2002). D-amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization: effect of lesioning dopaminergic terminals in the medial prefrontal cortex, the amygdala and the entorhinal cortex. Neuroscience 109: 499-516.
7. Bouton M (1991). Sources of relapse after extinction in pavlovian and instrumental learning. Clin Psychol Rev 11: 125-140.
8. Burns LH, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (1993). Differential effects of excitotoxic lesions of the basolateral amygdala, ventral subiculum and medial prefrontal cortex on responding with conditioned reinforcement and locomotor activity potentiated by intra-accumbens infusions of D-amphetamine. Behav Brain Res 55: 167-183.
9. Cabib S (1993). Strain-dependent behavioural sensitization to amphetamine: role of environmental influences. Behav Pharmacol 4: 367-374.
10. Cador M, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (1989). Involvement of the amygdala in stimulus-reward associations: interaction with the ventral striatum. Neuroscience 30: 77-86.
11. Cador M, Taylor JR, Robbins TW (1991). Potentiation of the effects of reward-related stimuli by dopaminergic-dependent mechanisms in the nucleus accumbens. Psychopharmacology 104: 377-385.
12. Carey RJ, Gui J (1998). Cocaine conditioning and cocaine sensitization: what is the relationship? Behav Brain Res 92: 67-76.
13. Crombag HS, Badiani A, Maren S, Robinson TE (2000). The role of contextual vs discrete drug-associated cues in promoting the induction of psychomotor sensitization to intravenous amphetamine. Behav Brain Res 116: 1-22.
14. Crombag HS, Mueller H, Browman K, Badiani A, Robinson TE (1999). A comparison of two behavioral measures of psychomotor activation following intravenous amphetamine or cocaine: dose-and sensitization-dependent changes. Behav Pharmacol 10: 205-213.
15. Cunningham ST, Kelley AE (1992). Evidence for opiate-dopamine cross-sensitization in nucleus accumbens: studies of conditioned reward. Brain Res Bull 29: 675-680.
16. Duvauchelle CL, Ikegami A, Asami S, Robens J, Kressin K, Castaneda E (2000a). Effects of cocaine context on NAcc dopamine and behavioral activity after repeated intravenous cocaine administration. Brain Res 862: 49-58.
17. Duvauchelle CL, Ikegami A, Castaneda E (2000b). Conditioned increases in behavioral activity and accumbens dopamine levels produced by intravenous cocaine. Behav Neurosci 114: 1156-1166.
18. Everitt BJ, Cardinal RN, Hall J, Parkinson JA, Robbins TW (2000). Differential involvement of amygdala subsystems in appetitive conditioning and drug addiction. In: Aggleton J (ed). The Amygdala. Oxford University Press: New York. pp 353-390.
19. Harmer CJ, Phillips GD (1998). Enhanced appetitive conditioning following repeated pretreatment with D-amphetamine. Behav Pharmacol 9: 299-308.
20. Harmer CJ, Phillips GD (1999). Enhanced dopamine efflux in the amygdala by a predictive, but not a non-predictive, stimulus: facilitation by prior repeated D-amphetamine. Neuroscience 90: 119-130.
21. Hinson RE, Poulos CX (1981). Sensitization to the behavioral effects of cocaine: modification by Pavlovian conditioning. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 15: 559-562.
22. Hitchcott PK, Phillips GD (1997). Amygdala and hippocampus control dissociable aspects of drug-associated conditioned rewards. Psychopharmacology 131: 187-195.
23. Holland PC (1992). Occasion setting in Pavlovian conditioning. In: Medlin DL (ed). The Psychology and Learning and Motivation. Academic Press: San Diego, CA. pp 69-125.
24. Horger BA, Giles MK, Schenk S (1992). Preexposure to amphetamine and nicotine predisposes rats to self-administer a low dose of cocaine. Psychopharmacology 107: 271-276.
25. Hotsenpiller G, Wolf ME (2002). Conditioned locomotion is not correlated with behavioral sensitization to cocaine: an intra-laboratory multi-sample analysis. Neuropsychopharmacology 27: 924-929.
26. Kelley AE, Delfs JM (1991a). Dopamine and conditioned reinforcement. I. Differential effects of amphetamine microinjections into striatal subregions. Psychopharmacology 103: 187-196.
27. Kelley AE, Delfs JM (1991b). Dopamine and conditioned reinforcement. II. Contrasting effects of amphetamine microinjection into the nucleus accumbens with peptide microinjection into the ventral tegmental area. Psychopharmacology 103: 197-203.
28. Kelly PH (1978): Drug-induced motor behavior. In: Iverson LL, Iverson SD (eds). Handbook of Psychopharmacology. Plenum: New York. pp 195-331.
29. Lett BT (1988). Enhancement of conditioned preference for a place paired with amphetamine produced by blocking the association between place and amphetamine-induced sickness. Psychopharmacology 95: 390-394.
30. Mackintosh NJ (1983). Conditioning and Associative Learning. Oxford University Press: New York.
31. Martin-Iverson M, Fawcett S (1996). Pavlovian conditioning of psychomotor stimulant-induced behaviours: has convenience let us astray? Behav Pharmacol 7: 24-41.
32. Mazurski EJ, Beninger RJ (1987). Environment-specific conditioning and sensitization with (+)-amphetamine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 27: 61-65.
33. Mead AN, Katz JL, Rocha BA (2002). Intravenous cocaine-induced activity in A/J and C57BL/6J mice: behavioral sensitization and conditioned activity. Neuropharmacology 42: 976-986.
34. Mead AN, Stephens DN (2003). Selective disruption of stimulus-reward learning in glutamate receptor grial knock-out mice. J Neurosci 23: 1041-1048.
35. Mead AN, Vasilaki A, Spyraki C, Duka T, Stephens DN (1999). AMPA-receptor involvement in c-fos expression in the medial prefrontal cortex and amygdala dissociates neural substrates of conditioned activity and conditioned reward. Eur J Neurosci 11: 4089-4098.
36. Mendrek A, Blaha CD, Phillips AG (1998). Pre-exposure of rats to amphetamine sensitizes self-administration of this drug under a progressive ratio schedule. Psychopharmacology 135: 416-422.
37. O'Dell LE, Sussman AN, Meyer KL, Neisewander JL (1999). Behavioral effects of psychomotor stimulant infusions into amygdaloid nuclei. Neuropsychopharmacology 20: 591-602.
38. Parkinson JA, Olmstead MC, Burns LH, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (1999). Dissociation in effects of lesions of the nucleus accumbens core and shell on appetitive pavlovian approach behavior and the potentiation of conditioned reinforcement and locomotor activity by D-amphetamine. J Neurosci 19: 2401-2411.
39. Paulson PE, Robinson TE (1991). Sensitization to systemic amphetamine produces an enhanced locomotor response to a subsequent intra-accumbens amphetamine challenge in rats. Psychopharmacology 104: 140-141.
40. Pert A, Post R, Weiss SR (1990). Conditioning as a critical determinant of sensitization induced by psychomotor stimulants. NIDA Res Monogr 97: 208-241.
41. Piazza PV, Deminiere JM, Le Moal M, Simon H (1989). Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science 245: 1511-1513.
42. Post RM, Weiss SR, Pert A (1987). The role of context and conditioning in behavioral sensitization to cocaine. Psychopharmacol Bull 23: 425-429.
43. Robbins TW (1976). Relationship between reward-enhancing and stereotypical effects of psychomotor stimulant drugs. Nature 264: 57-59.
44. Robinson TE, Berridge KC (2003). Addiction. Ann Rev Psychol 54: 25-53.
45. Stewart J, Badiani A (1993). Tolerance and sensitization to the behavioral effects of drugs. Behav Pharmacol 4: 289-312.
46. Stewart J, Vezina P (1988). Conditioning and behavioral sensitization. In: Kalivas PW, Barnes CD (eds). Sensitization in the Nervous System. Telford Press: Caldwell, NJ. pp 207-224.
47. Sutton MA, Beninger RJ (1999). Psychopharmacology of conditioned reward: evidence for a rewarding signal at D1-like dopamine receptors. Psychopharmacology 144: 95-110.
48. Taylor JR, Horger BA (1999). Enhanced responding for conditioned reward produced by intra-accumbens amphetamine is potentiated after cocaine sensitization. Psychopharmacology 142: 31-40.
49. Taylor JR, Jentsch JD (2001). Repeated intermittent administration of psychomotor stimulant drugs alters the acquisition of Pavlovian approach behavior in rats: differential effects of cocaine, D-amphetamine and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine ('Ecstasy'). Biol Psychiatry 50: 137-143.
50. Taylor JR, Robbins TW (1984). Enhanced behavioural control by conditioned reinforcers following microinjections of D-amphetamine into the nucleus accumbens. Psychopharmacology 84: 405-412.
51. Tilson HA, Rech RA (1973). Conditioned drug effects and absence of tolerance to D-amphetamine induced motor activity. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1: 149-153.
52. Tirelli E, Terry P (1998). Amphetamine-induced conditioned activity and sensitization: the role of habituation to the test context and the involvement of Pavlovian processes. Behav Pharmacol 9: 409-419.
53. Tomie A (1996). Locating reward cue at response manipulandum (CAM) induces symptoms of drug abuse. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 20: 505-535.
54. Vezina P, Giovino AA, Wise RA, Stewart J (1989). Environment-specific cross-sensitization between the locomotor activating effects of morphine and amphetamine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 32: 581-584.
55. Vezina P, Lorrain DS, Arnold GM, Austin JD, Suto N (2002). Sensitization of midbrain dopamine neuron reactivity promotes the pursuit of amphetamine. J Neurosci 22: 4654-4662.
56. Wise RA, Bozarth MA (1987). A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction. Psychol Rev 94: 469-492.
57. Wolf ME, Dahlin SL, Hu XT, Xue CJ, White K (1995). Effects of lesions of prefrontal cortex, amygdala, or fornix on behavioral sensitization to amphetamine: comparison with N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists. Neuroscience 69: 417-439.
58. Wolterink G, Phillips G, Cador M, Donselaar-Wolterink I, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (1993). Relative roles of ventral striatal D1 and D2 dopamine receptors in responding with conditioned reinforcement. Psychopharmacology 110: 355-364.
59. Wyvell CL, Berridge KC (2001). Incentive sensitization by previous amphetamine exposure: increased cue-triggered 'wanting' for sucrose reward. J Neurosci 21: 7831-7840.