Amphetamine-induced conditioned activity and sensitization: The role of habituation to the test context and the involvement of Pavlovian processes

Behavioural Pharmacology

Volumn 9, Issue 5-6, 1998, Pages 409-419

  Tirelli, E ^a   Terry, P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Amphetamine; Conditioning; Habituation; Mice; Psychostimulants; Reverse tolerance; Sensitization

Indexed keywords

AMPHETAMINE; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; HABITUATION; INTRAPERITONEAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MALE; MOBILIZATION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; REARING; SENSITIZATION;

EID: 0031736978     PISSN: 09558810     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008877-199809000-00004     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ahmed SH, Cador M, Le Moal M, Stinus L (1995). Amphetamine-induced conditioned activity in rats: comparison with novelty-induced activity and role of the basolateral amygdala. Behav Neurosci 109:723-733.
2. Ahmed SH, Oherling P, Di Scala G, Sandner G (1996). Amphetamine-induced conditioned activity does not result from a failure of rats to habituate to novelty. Psychopharmacology 123:325-332.
3. Anagnostaras SG, Robinson TE (1996). Sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant effects of amphetamine: modulation by associative learning. Behav Neurosci 110:1397-1414.
4. Beck, CHM, Chow HL, Cooper SJ (1986). Initial environment influences amphetamine-induced stereotypy: subsequently environment change has little effect. Behav Neural Biol 46:383-397.
5. Bittermann ME, Lolordo VM, Overmier JB, Rashotte ME (1979). Animal learning: survey and analysis. New York: Plenum Press.
6. Brown EE, Fibiger HC (1993). Differential effects of excitotoxic lesions of the amygdala on cocaine-induced conditioned locomotion and place preference. Psychopharmacology 113:123-130.
7. Camp DM, Robinson TE (1988). Susceptibility to sensitization. II. The influence of gonadal hormones on enduring changes in monoamines and behavior produced by the repeated administration of D-amphetamine or restraint stress. Behav Brain Res 30:69-88.
8. Damianopoulos EN, Carey RJ (1992a). Conditioning, habituation and behavioral reorganization factors in chronic cocaine effects. Behav Brain Res 49:149-157.
9. Damianopoulos EN, Carey RJ (1992b). Pavlovian conditioning of CNS drug effects: a critical review and new experimental design. Rev Neurosci 3:65-77.
10. Domjan M (1993). Domjan and Burkhard's the principles of learning and behavior. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole.
11. Drew KL, Glick SD (1988). Characterization of the associative nature of sensitization to amphetamine-induced circling behavior and of the environment-dependent placebo-like response. Psychopharmacology 95:482-487.
12. File SE (1977). Effects of parachlorophenylalanine and amphetamine on habituation to exploration. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 6:151-156.
13. Gold LH, Swerdlow NR, Koob GF (1988). The role of mesolimbic dopamine in conditioned locomotion produced by amphetamine. Behav Neurosci 102:544-552.
14. Hayashi T, Ohashi K, Tadokoro S (1980). Conditioned drug effects to d-amphetamine-and morphine-induced motor acceleration in mice: experimental approach for placebo effect. Jpn J Pharmacol 30:93-100.
15. Herz RS, Beninger RJ (1987). Comparison of the ability of (+)-amphetamine and caffeine to produce environment-specific conditioning. Psychopharmacology 92:365-370.
16. Hinson RE, Poulos CX (1981). Sensitization to the behavioral effects of cocaine: modification by Pavlovian conditioning. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 15:559-562.
17. Hughes RN, Greig AM (1976). Effects of caffeine, methamphetamine and methylphenidate on reactions to novelty and activity in rats. Neuropharmacology 15:673-676.
18. Krank MD, Bennett D (1987). Conditioned activity and the interaction of amphetamine experience with morphine's activity effects. Behav Neural Biol 48:422-433.
19. Lorenzini CA, Bucherelli C, Giachetti A, Tassoni G (1990). Inhibition of exploratory behavior in the rat by handling. Anim Learning Behav 18:191-198.
20. Lubow RE (1989). Latent inhibition and conditioned attention theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Martin-Iverson MT, Fawcett SL (1996). Pavlovian conditioning of psychomotor stimulant-induced behaviors: has convenience led us astray? Behav Pharmacol 7:24-41.
22. Martin-Iversen MT, McManus DJ (1990). Stimulant conditioned locomotion is not affected by blockade of D1 and/or D2 dopamine receptors during conditioning. Brain Res 521:175-184.
23. Martin-Iverson MT, Reimer AR (1994). Effects of nimodipine and/or haloperidol on the expression of conditioned locomotion and sensitization to cocaine in rats. Psychopharmacology 114:315-320.
24. Mattingly BA, Koch C, Osborne FH, Gotsick JE (1997). Stimulus and response factors affecting the development of behavioral sensitization to apomorphine. Psychopharmacology 31:871-875.
25. Mazurski EJ, Beninger RJ (1991). Environment specific conditioning and sensitization with (+)-amphetamine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 27:61-65.
26. Meier GW (1962). Suppression of activity following physiological saline injection: still more variables. Psychol Rep 11:333-334.
27. Pickens RW, Crowder WF (1967). Effects of CS-US interval on conditioning of drug response with assessment of speed of conditioning. Psychopharmacologia 11:88-94.
28. Pickens RW, Dougherty JA (1971). Conditioning of the activity effects of drugs. In: Stimulus properties of drugs. Thompson T, Pickens RW (editors). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. pp. 39-50.
29. Post RM, Lockfield A, Squillace KM, Contel NR (1981). Drug-environment interaction: context dependency of cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization. Life Sci 28:755-760.
30. Reimer AR, Martin-Iverson MT (1994). Nimodipine and haloperidol attenuate behavioural sensitization to cocaine but only nimodipine blocks the establishment of conditioned locomotion induced by cocaine. Psychopharmacology 113:404-410.
31. Robbins TW, Iversen SD (1973). A dissociation of the effects of d-amphetamine on locomotor activity and exploration in rats. Psychopharmacologia 28:155-164.
32. Schiff SR (1982). Conditioned dopaminergic activity. Biol Psychiatry 17:135-154.
33. Segal DS, Mandell AJ (1974). Long-term administration of d-amphetamine: progressive augmentation of motor activity and stereotypy. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2:249-255.
34. Stewart J, Vezina P (1988). Conditioning and behavioral sensitization. In: Sensitization in the nervous system. Kalivas PW, Barnes CD (editors). Caldwell, NJ: Telford Press, pp. 207-224.
35. Suen HK, Ary D (1989). Analyzing quantitative behavioral observation data. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36. Sullivan R, Dogaru C, Szechtman H (1992). Constriction of environmental space and the behavioral response to the dopamine agonist quinpirole. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 43:1217-1219.
37. Szechtman H, Eilam D, Teitelbaum P, Golani I (1988). A different look at measurement and interpretation of drug-induced stereotyped behavior. Psychobiology 16:164-173.
38. Terry P (1992). Differential effects of injection regimen on behavioral responses to cocaine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 41:365-369.
39. Tilson HA, Rech RH (1973). Conditioned drug effects and absence of tolerance to d-amphetamine induced motor activity. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1:149-153.
40. Willner P, Papp S, Cheeta S, Muscat R (1992). Environmental influences on behavioral sensitization to the dopamine agonist quinpirole. Behav Pharmacol 3:43-50.
41. Wimer RE, Fuller JL (1965). The effects of d-amphetamine sulphate on three exploratory behaviors. Can J Psychol 19:94-103.
42. Winer BJ, Brown DR, Michels KM (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
43. Wise RA, Gingras MA, Amit Z (1996). Influence of novel and habituated testing conditions on cocaine sensitization. Eur J Pharmacol 307:15-19.
44. Wynne B, Delius JD (1995). Sensitization to apomorphine in pigeons: unaffected by latent inhibition but still due to classical conditioning. Psychopharmacology 119:414-420.