Sensitization of stereotyped behavior to amphetamine is context and response dependent

Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 263-269

  Battisti, John J ^a   Chang, Cheng Huan ^a   Uretsky, Norman J ^a   Wallace, Lane J ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Amphetamine; Mice; Sensitization; Stereotypy

Indexed keywords

AMPHETAMINE;

ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; ENVIRONMENT; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIZATION; STEREOTYPY;

ANIMALS; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS; DEXTROAMPHETAMINE; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DRUG RESISTANCE; MALE; MICE; STEREOTYPED BEHAVIOR; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0032908765     PISSN: 00913057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0091-3057(98)00259-7     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anagnostaras S.G., Robinson T.E. Sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant effects of amphetamine. Behav. Neurosci. 110:1996;1397-1414.
2. Badiani A., Anagnostaras S.G., Robinson T.E. The development of sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant effects of amphetamine is enhanced in a novel environment. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 117:1995;443-452.
3. Badiani A., Browman K.E., Robinson T.E. Influence of novel versus home environments on sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant effects of cocaine and amphetamine. Brain Res. 674:1995;291-298.
4. Badiani A., Camp D.M., Robinson T.E. Enduring enhancement of amphetamine sensitization by drug-associated environmental stimuli. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 282:1997;787-794.
5. Bedingfield J.B., Calder L.D., Karler R. Comparative behavioral sensitization to stereotypy by direct and indirect dopamine agonists in CF-1 mice. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 124:1996;219-225.
6. Bedingfield J.B., Calder L.D., Thai D.K., Karler R. The role of the striatum in the mouse in behavioral sensitization to amphetamine. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 56:1997;305-310.
7. Creese I., Iversen S.D. The role of forebrain dopamine systems in amphetamine induced stereotyped behavior in the rat. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 39:1974;345-357.
8. Crombag H.S., Badiani A., Robinson T.E. Signalled versus unsignalled intravenous amphetamine. Large differences in the acute psychomotor response and sensitization Brain Res. 722:1996;227-231.
9. Drew K.L., Glick S.D. Role of D-1 and D-2 receptor stimulation in sensitization to amphetamine-induced circling behavior and in expression and extinction of the Pavlovian conditioned response. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 101:1990;465-471.
10. Einat H., Einat D., Allan M., Talangbayan H., Tsafnat T., Szechtman H. Associational and nonassociational mechanisms in locomotor sensitization to the dopamine agonist quinpirole. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 127:1996;95-101.
11. Ellinwood E.H., Balster R.L. Rating the behavioral effects of amphetamine. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 28:1974;35-41.
12. Elmer G.I., Gorelick D.A., Goldberg S.R., Rothman R.B. Acute sensitivity vs context-specific sensitization to cocaine as a function of genotype. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 53:1996;623-628.
13. Jackson H.C., Nutt D.J. A single preexposure produces sensitization to the locomotor effects of cocaine in mice. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 45:1993;733-735.
14. Jodogne C., Marinelli M., Le Moal M., Piazza P.V. Animals predisposed to develop amphetamine self-administration show higher susceptibility to develop contextual conditioning of both amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion and sensitization. Brain Res. 657:1994;236-244.
15. Kalivas P.W., Stewart J. Dopamine transmission in the initiation and expression of drug- and stress-induced sensitization of motor activity. Brain Res. Rev. 16:1991;233-244.
16. Karler R., Chaudhry I.A., Calder L.D., Turkanis S.A. Amphetamine behavioral sensitization and the excitatory amino acids. Brain Res. 537:1990;76-82.
17. Kelly P.H., Seviour P.W., Iversen S.D. Amphetamine and apomorphine responses in the rat following 6-OHDA lesions of the nucleus accumbens. Brain Res. 94:1975;507-522.
18. Kuribara H. Importance of post-drug environmental factors for induction of sensitization to the ambulation-increasing effects of methamphetamine and cocaine in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 126:1996;293-300.
19. Kuribara H. Interval-dependent inhibition of morphine sensitization of ambulation in mice by post-morphine treatment with naloxone or restraint. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 125:1996;129-134.
20. Kuribara H. Effects of postmethamphetamine treatment with restraint on ambulatory sensitization to methamphetamine in mice. Brain Res. Bull. 43:1997;97-100.
21. Kuribara H. Induction of sensitization to hyperactivity caused by morphine in mice. Effects of post-drug environments Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 57:1997;341-346.
22. Kuribara H., Uchihashi Y. Effects of dopamine antagonism on methamphetamine sensitization. Evaluation by ambulatory activity in mice Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 47:1994;101-106.
23. Litchfield J.T. Jr., Wilcoxon J.T. A simplified method for evaluating dose-effect experiments. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 96:1949;99-113.
24. 2 receptors does not block the behavioral sensitization to cocaine. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 114:1994;239-242.
25. Mattingly B.A., Koch C., Osborne F.H., Gotsick J.E. Stimulus and response factors affecting the development of behavioral sensitization to apomorphine. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 130:1997;109-116.
26. Reimer A.R., Martin-Iverson M.T. Nimodipine and haloperidol attenuate behavioral sensitization to cocaine but only nimodipine blocks the establishment of conditioned locomotion by cocaine. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 113:1994;404-410.
27. Robinson T.E., Becker J.B. Enduring changes in brain and behavior produced by chronic amphetamine administration. A review and evaluation of animal models of amphetamine psychosis Brain Res. Rev. 11:1986;157-198.
28. Robinson T.E., Berridge K.C. The neural basis of drug craving. An incentive-sensitization theory of drug addiction Brain Res. Rev. 18:1993;247-291.
29. Segal D.S., Mandell A.J. Long-term administration of d-amphetamine. Progressive augmentation of motor activity and stereotypy Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2:1974;249-255.
30. Sharp T., Zetterstrom T., Ljungberg T., Ungerstedt U. A direct comparison of amphetamine-induced behaviors and regional brain dopamine release in the rat using intracerebral dialysis. Brain Res. 401:1987;322-330.
31. Ungerstedt U. Central dopamine mechanisms and unconditioned behavior. Horn A.S., Korf J., Westernick B.H.C. The neurobiology of dopamine. 1979;577-596 Academic Press, London.
32. Vezina P., Stewart J. The effect of dopamine receptor blockade on the development of sensitization to the locomotor activating effects of amphetamine and morphine. Brain Res. 499:1989;108-120.
33. Weiss S., Post R.M., Pert A., Woodward R., Murman D. Context-dependent cocaine sensitization. Differential effect of haloperidol on development versus expression Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 34:1989;655-661.
34. Willner P., Papp M., Cheeta S., Muscat R. Environmental influences on behavioral sensitization to the dopamine agonist quinpirole. Behav. Pharmacol. 3:1992;43-50.