Outcrossing rates in the gynomonoecious-gynodioecious species Dianthus sylvestris (Caryophyllaceae)

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 90, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 579-585

  Collin, Carine L ^a   Shykoff, Jacqui A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

Author keywords

Biparental inbreeding; Correlations of outcrossed paternity; Geitonogamy; Gynomonoecy gynodioecy; Selfing

Indexed keywords

GYNODIOECY; GYNOMONOECY; OUTCROSSING; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY;

CARYOPHYLLACEAE; DIANTHUS; DIANTHUS CARYOPHYLLUS; DIANTHUS SYLVESTRIS;

EID: 0842267310     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.90.4.579     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. AIDE, T. M. 1986. The influence of wind and animal pollination on variation in outcrossing rates. Evolution 40: 434-435.
2. ANDERSSON, H. 1999. Female and hermaphrodite flowers on a chimeric gynomonoecious Silene vulgaris plant produce offspring with different genders: a case of heteroplasmic sex determination? Journal of Heredity 90: 563-565.
3. ASHMAN, T.-L., AND C. DIEFENDERFER. 2001. Sex ratio represents a unique context for selection on attractive traits: consequences for the evolution of sexual dimorphism. American Naturalist 157: 334-347.
4. ASHMAN, T.-L., J. SWETZ, AND S. SHIVITZ. 2000. Understanding the basis of pollinator selectivity in sexually dimorphic Fragaria virginiana. Oikos 90: 347-356.
5. ATLAN, A., P.-H. GOUYON, T. FOURNIAL, D. POMENTE, AND D. COUVET. 1992. Sex allocation in an hermaphroditic plant: the case of gynodioecy in Thymus vulgaris L. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 5: 189-203.
6. BELL, G. 1985. On the function of flowers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 224: 223-265.
7. BERTIN, R. I., AND M. A. KERWIN. 1998. Floral sex ratios and gynomonoecy in Aster (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 85: 235-244.
8. BURD, M. 1994. Bateman's Principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. Botanical Review 60: 83-139.
9. CHARLESWORTH, B., AND D. CHARLESWORTH. 1978. A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. American Naturalist 112: 975-997.
10. CHARLESWORTH, D. 1981. A further study of the problem of the maintenance of females in gynodioecious species. Heredity 46: 27-39.
11. CHARLESWORTH, D., AND V. LAPORTE. 1998. The male-sterility polymorphism of Silene vulgaris: analysis of genetic data from two populations and comparison with Thymus vulgaris. Genetics 150: 1267-1282.
12. COLLIN, C. L., P. S. PENNINGS, C. RUEFFLER, A. WIDMER, AND J. A. SHYKOFF. 2002. Natural enemies and sex: how seed predators and pathogens contribute to sex-differential reproductive success in a gynodioecious plant. Oecologia 131: 94-102.
13. DARWIN, C. 1877. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. Murray, London, UK.
14. DE JONG, T. J., N. M. WASER, AND P. G. L. KLINKHAMER. 1993. Geitonogamy: the neglected side of selfing. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 321-325.
15. DELPH, L. F. 1996. Flower size dimorphism in plants with unisexual flowers. In D. G. Lloyd and S. C. H. Barret [eds.], Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants, 217-237. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
16. DELPH, L. F., L. F. GALLOWAY, AND M. L. STANTON. 1996. Sexual dimorphism in flower size. American Naturalist 148: 299-320.
17. DELPH, L. F., AND C. M. LIVELY. 1992. Pollinator visitation, floral display, and nectar production of the sexual morphs of a gynodioecious shrub. Oikos 63: 161-170.
18. DESFEUX, C. 1996. L'évolution des systèmes de reproduction chez les plantes à fleurs: modélisation et approches expérimentales sur des espèces du genre Silene. Ph.D. thesis, Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon, Paris, France.
19. ECKHART, V. M. 1992a. Spatio-temporal variation in abundance and variation in foraging behavior of the pollinators of gynodioecious Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Oikos 64: 573-586.
20. ECKHART, V. M. 1992b. The genetics of gender and the effects of gender on floral characters in gynodioecious Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae), American Journal of Botany 79: 792-800.
21. ECKHART, V. M. 1999. Sexual dimorphism in flowers and inflorescences. In M. A. Geber, T. E. Dawson, and L. F. Delph [eds.], Gender and dimorphism in flowering plants, 123-148. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
22. GEBER, M. A. 1985. The relationship of plant size to self-pollination in Mertensia ciliata. Ecology 66: 762-772.
23. GRAFF, A. 1999. Population sex structure and reproductive fitness in gynodioecious Sidalcea malvifiora malviflora (Malvaceae). Evolution 53: 1714-1722.
24. GUITIÁN, P., AND M. MEDRANO. 2000. Sex expression and fruit set in Silene littorea (Caryophyllaceae): variation among populations. Nordic Journal of Botany 20: 467-473.
25. HARDER, L. D., AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 1995. Mating cost of large floral displays in hermaphrodite plants. Nature 373: 512-515.
26. HESSING, M. B. 1988. Geitonogamous pollination and its consequences in Geranium caespitosum. American Journal of Botany 75: 1324-1333.
27. HIDALGO, P. J., AND J. L. UBERA. 2001. Inbreeding depression in Rosmarinus officinalis L. International Journal of Developmental Biology 45: S43-S44.
28. HODGES, S. A. 1995. The influence of nectar production on hawkmoth behaviour, self pollination, and seed production in Mirabilis multiflora (Nyctaginaceae). American Journal of Botany 82: 197-204.
29. HOROVITZ, A., AND J. HARDING. 1972. Genetics of Lupinus. V. Intraspecific variability for reproductive traits in Lupinus nanus. Botanical Gazette 133: 155-165.
30. HUSBAND, B. C., AND D. W. SCHEMSKE. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50: 54-70.
31. KAUL, M. L. H. 1988. Gynodioecy. In M. L. H. Kaul [ed.], Male sterility in higher plants, 268-277. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
32. KLINKHAMER, P. G. L., AND T. J. DE JONG. 1993. Attractiveness to pollinators: a plant's dilemma. Oikos 66: 180-184.
33. KOELEWIJN, H. P. 1996. Sexual differences in reproductive characters in gynodioecious Plantago coronopus. Oikos 75: 443-452.
34. KOELEWIJN, H. P., AND J. M. M. VAN DAMME. 1996. Gender variation, partial male sterility and labile sex expression in gynodioecious Plantago coronopus. New Phytologist 132: 67-76.
35. KOHN, J. R., AND J. E. BIARDI. 1995. Outcrossing rates and inferred levels of inbreeding depression in gynodioecious Cucurbita foetidissima (Cucurbitaceae). Heredity 75: 77-83.
36. LEVIN, D. A. 1972. Low frequency disadvantage in the exploitation of pollinators by corolla variants in Phlox. American Naturalist 106: 453-460.
37. LEWIS, D. 1941. Male sterility in natural populations of hermaphroditic plants. New Phytologist 40: 55-63.
38. LLOYD, D. G. 1975. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in angiosperms. Genetica 45: 325-339.
39. MAKI, M. 1993. Outcrossing and fecundity advantage of females in gynodioecious Chionographis japonica var. kurohimensis (Liliaceae). American Journal of Botany 80: 629-634.
40. MAURICE, S. 1999. Gynomonoecy in Silene italica (Caryophyllaceae): sexual phenotypes in natural populations. Plant Biology 1: 346-350.
41. MCCAULEY, D. E., AND M. T. BROCK. 1998. Frequency-dependent fitness in Silene vulgaris, a gynodioecious plant. Evolution 52: 30-36.
42. MCCAULEY, D. E., AND D. R. TAYLOR. 1997. Local population structure and sex-ratio: evolution in gynodioecious plants. American Naturalist 150: 406-419.
43. PASTEUR, N., G. PASTEUR, F. BONHOMME, J. CATALAN, AND J. BRITTON-DAVIDIAN. 1987. Manuel technique de génétique par électrophorèse des protéines. Lavoisier, Paris, France.
44. PETTERSSON, M. W. 1991. Pollination by a guild of fluctuating moth populations: option for unspecialization in Silene vulgaris. Journal of Ecology 79: 591-604.
45. PETTERSSON, M. W. 1992. Advantages of being a specialist female in gynodioecious Silene vulgaris S. L. (Caryophyllaceae). American Journal of Botany 79: 1389-1395.
46. PHILIPP, M. 1980. Reproductive biology of Stellaria longipes Goldie as revealed by a cultivation experiment. New Phytologist 85: 557-569.
47. PHILIPPI, T., AND J. SEGER. 1989. Hedging one's evolutionary bets, revisited. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4: 41-44.
48. RICE, W. R. 1989. Analysing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223-225.
49. RITLAND, K. 1990. A series of FORTRAN computer programs for estimating plant mating systems. Journal of Heredity 81: 235-237.
50. RITLAND, K., AND S. K. JAIN. 1981. A model for the estimation of outcrossing rate and gene frequencies using n independent loci. Heredity 47: 35-52.
51. RITLAND, K., AND S. K. JAIN. 1983. Estimation of mating systems. In S. D. Tanksley and T. J. Orton [eds.], Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding. 289-302. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
52. SAKAI, A. K., S. G. WELLER, M.-L. CHEN, S.-Y. CHOU, AND C. TASANONT. 1997. Evolution of gynodioecy and maintenance of females: the role of inbreeding depression, outcrossing rates, and resource allocation in Schieda adamantis (Caryophyllaceae). Evolution 51: 724-736.
53. SCHOEN, D. J. 1982. The breeding system of Gilia achilleifolia: variation in floral characteristics and outcrossing rate. Evolution 36: 352-360.
54. SHYKOFF, J. A. 1992. Sex polymorphism in Silene acaulis (Caryophyllaceae) and the possible role of sexual selection in maintaining females. American Journal of Botany 79: 138-143.
55. SHYKOFF, J. A., E. BUCHELI, AND O. KALTZ. 1997. Anther smut disease in Dianthus Silvester (Caryophyllaceae): natural selection on floral traits. Evolution 51: 383-392.
56. SHYKOFF, J. A., S.-O. KOLOKOTRONIS, C. L. COLLIN, AND M. LÓPEZ-VILLAVICENCIO. 2003. Effects of male sterility on reproductive traits in gynodioecious plants: a meta-analysis. Oecologia, in press.
57. SUN, M., AND F. R. GANDERS. 1988. Mixed mating systems in Hawaiian Bidens (Asteraceae). Evolution 42: 516-527.
58. TALAVERA, S., M. ARISTA, AND F. J. SALGUEIRO. 1996. Population size, pollination and breeding system of Silene stockenii Chater (Caryophyllaceae), an annual gynodioecious species of southern Spain. Botanica Acta 109: 333-339.
59. THOMPSON, J. D., D. MANICACCI, AND M. TARAYRE. 1998. Thirty-five years of thyme: a tale of two polymorphisms. BioScience 48: 805-815.
60. UNO, G. E. 1982. Comparative reproductive biology of hermaphroditic and male-sterile Iris douglasiana Herb. (Iridaceae). American Journal of Botany 69: 818-823.
61. VALDEYRON, G., B. DOMMÉE, AND P. VERNET. 1977. Self-fertilisation in male-fertile plants of a gynodioecious species. Heredity 39: 243-249.
62. WENDEL, J. F., AND N. F. WEEDEN. 1990. Visualisation and interpretation of plant isozymes. In D. E. Soltis and P. S. Soltis [eds.], Isozymes in plant biology, 5-45. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
63. WIDÉN, B., AND M. WIDÉN. 1990. Pollen limitation and distance-dependent fecundity in females of the clonal gynodioecious herb Glechoma hederacea (Lamiaceae). Oecologia 83: 191-196.
64. WIDÉN, M. 1992. Sexual reproduction in a clonal, gynodioecious herb Glechoma hederacea. Oikos 63: 430-438.
65. WIDÉN, M., AND B. WIDÉN. 1999. Sex expression in the clonal gynodioecious herb Glechoma hederacea (Lamiaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 77: 1689-1698.
66. WIKLUND, C., T. ERIKSSON, AND H. LUNDBERG. 1979. The wood white butterfly Leptidea sinapis and its nectar plants: a case of mutualism or parasitism? Oikos 33: 358-362.
67. WILLIAMS, C. F., M. A. KUCHENREUTHER, AND A. DREW 2000. Floral dimorphism, pollination, and self-fertilization in gynodioecious Geranium richardsonii (Geraniaceae). American Journal of Botany 87: 661-669.
68. WOLFF, K., B. FRISO, AND J. M. M. VAN DAMME. 1988. Outcrossing rates and male sterility in natural populations of Plantago coronopus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 76: 190-196.