Experimental on-line identification of an electromechanical system

ISA Transactions

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 13-22

  Eker, Ilyas ^a  

^a GAZIANTEP UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Closed loop; Electromechanical system; Least squares estimation; Open loop; System identification

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DC MOTORS; DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS; ELECTRIC DRIVES; ELECTRIC RESISTANCE; ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS); INDUCTANCE; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SHAFTS (MACHINE COMPONENTS); TORQUE;

CLOSED-LOOPS; ELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEMS; LEAST-SQUARES ESTIMATION; OPEN-LOOPS;

ELECTROMECHANICAL DEVICES;

EID: 0742269794     PISSN: 00190578     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0019-0578(07)60016-0     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Lakshminarayanan, S., Emoto, G., Ebara, S., Tomida, K., and Shah, S. L., Closed loop identification and control loop reconfiguration: An industrial case study. J. Process Control 11, 587-599 (2001).
2. Hang, C. C., Lee, T. H., and Weng, K. H., Adaptive Control. Instrument Society of America, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1993.
3. Lyshevski, S. E., Nonlinear control of mechatronic systems with permanent-magnet DC motors. Mechatronics 9, 539-552 (1999).
4. Alexander, C. W. and Trahan, R. E., A comparison of traditional and adaptive control strategies for systems with time delay. ISA Trans. 40, 353-368 (2001).
5. Jang, J. O. and Jeon, G. J., A parallel neuro-controller for dc motors containing nonlinear friction, Neuro-computing 30, 233-248 (2000).
6. Lin, J. M., Lin, M. C., and Wang, H. P., LEQG/LTR controller design with extended Kalman filter for sensorless brushless DC driver. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 190, 5481-5494 (2001).
7. Horng, J. H., Neural adaptive tracking control of a DC motor. Inf. Sci. (N.Y.) 118, 1-13 (1999).
8. Yavin, Y. and Kemp, P. D., Modelling and control of the motion of a rolling disk: Effect of the motor dynamics on the dynamical model. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 188, 613-624 (2000).
9. Mummadi, V. C., Steady-state and dynamic performance analysis of PV supplied DC motors fed from intermediate power converter. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 61, 365-381 (2000).
10. Santana, J., Naredo, J. L., Sandoval, F., Grout, I., and Argueta, O. J., Simulation and construction of a speed control for a DC series motor. Mechatronics 2, 1145-1156 (2002).
11. Ziaei, K. and Sepehri, N., Modelling and identification of electrohydraulic servos. Mechatronics 10, 761-772 (2000).
12. Chung, M. J. and Gweon, D. G., Modelling of the armature slotting effect in the magnetic field distribution of a linear permanent magnet motors. Electr. Eng. 84, 101-108 (2002).
13. Minkova, M. D., Minkov, D., Rodgerson, J. L., and Harley, R. G., Adaptive neural speed controller of a dc motor. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 47, 123-132 (1998).
14. Hori, Y., Iseki, H., and Sigiura, K., Basic consideration of vibration suppression and disturbance rejection control of multi-inertia system using state feedback and load acceleration control. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 30, 889-896 (1994).
15. Oldak, S., Baril, C., and Gutman, P. O., Quantitative design of a class of nonlinear systems with parameter uncertainty. Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control 4, 101-107 (1994).
16. Astrom, K. J. and Wittenmark, B., Adaptive Control. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1989.
17. Östring, M., Gunnarsson, S., and Norrlöf, M., Closed-loop identification of an industrial robot containing flexibilities. Control Eng. Pract. 11, 291-300 (2003).
18. Plummer, A. R. and Vaughan, N. D., Robust adaptive control for hydraulic servo systems. ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control 118, 237-244 (1996).
19. Seborg, D. E., Edgar, T. F., and Mellichamp, D. A., Process Dynamics and Control. Wiley, New York, 1989.
20. Benvenuti, L., De Santis, A., and Farina, L., On model consistency in compartmental systems identification. Automatica 38, 1969-1976 (2002).
21. Ljung, L., System Identification: Theory for the User. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1987.
22. Wellstead, P. E. and Zarrop, M. B., Self-tuning Systems: Control and Signal Processing. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK, 1991.
23. Robertson, D. G. and Lee, J. H., On the use of constraints in least squares estimation and control. Automatica 38, 1113-1123 (2002).
24. Craig, W. B. and Russell, E. T., A comparison of traditional and adaptive control strategies for systems with time delay. ISA Trans. 40, 353-368 (2001).
25. Godfrey, K., Perturbation Signals for System Identification. Prentice Hall Inter. Series in Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Hertfordshire, UK, 1993.