An experimental investigation of student response rates to faculty evaluations: The effect of the online method and online treatments

Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 691-695

  Dommeyer, Curt J ^a   Baum, Paul ^a   Chapman, Kenneth S ^a   Hanna, Robert W ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Course Instructor Evaluation; Faculty Student Evaluation

Indexed keywords

COURSE EVALUATION; FACULTY EVALUATION; INSTRUCTOR EVALUATION; STUDENT EVALUATION;

FEEDBACK; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; STUDENTS; SURVEYING; WEBSITES;

EDUCATION;

EID: 0442278476     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (3)

1. Dommeyer, C. J., Baum, P., Chapman, K. S., & Hanna, R. W. Attitudes of Business Faculty towards Two Methods of Collecting Teaching Evaluations: Paper vs. Online. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 2002, 27(5), 455-462.
2. Dommeyer, C. J., Baum, P. & Hanna, R. W. College Students' Attitudes Towards Methods of Collecting Teaching Evaluations: In-Class vs. On-Line. Journal of Education for Business, 2002, 78(1), 11-15.
3. Layne, B. H., DeCristoforo, J. R., & MCGinty, D. Electronic Versus Traditional Student Ratings of Instruction. Research in Higher Education, 1999, 40, 221-232.