College Students' Attitudes Toward Methods of Collecting Teaching Evaluations: In-Class Versus On-Line

Journal of Education for Business

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 11-15

  Dommeyer, Curt J ^a   Baum, Paul ^a   Hanna, Robert W ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901510669     PISSN: 08832323     EISSN: 19403356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08832320209599691     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Abbott, R. D., Wulff, D. H., Nyquist, J. D., Ropp, V. A., and Hess, C. W., 1990. Satisfaction with processes of collecting student opinions about instruction: The student perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82: 201–206.
2. Baum, P., Chapman, K., Dommeyer, C., and Hanna, R., On-line versus in-class student evaluations of faculty. Paper presented at the Hawaii Conference on Business. June14–17, Honolulu.
3. Blunt, A., 1991. The effects of anonymity and manipulated grades on student ratings of instructors. Community College Review, 18: 48–54.
4. Brandenburg, G. C., and Remmers, H. H., 1927. A rating scale for instructors. Educational Administration and Supervision, 13: 399–406.
5. Cashin, W. E., 1988. Student rating of teaching: A summary of the research, Manhattan, KS: Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, Kansas State University.
6. Feldman, K. A., 1979. The significance of circumstances for college students' ratings of their teachers and courses. Research in Higher Education, 10: 149–172.
7. Hewett, L., Chastain, G., and Thurber, S., Course evaluations: Are student ratings dictated by first impressions?. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association. Snowbird, Utah.
8. Layne, B. H., DeCristoforo, J. R., and McGinty, D., 1999. Electronic versus traditional student ratings of instruction. Research in Higher Education, 40 (2): 221–232.
9. Malhotra, N. K., 1999. Marketing research: An applied orientation, 3rd ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10. Marlin, J. W., 1987. Student perception of end-of-course evaluations. Journal of Higher Education, 58: 704–716.
11. Marsh, H. W., and Dunkin, M. J., 1992. “ Students' evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective ”. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research 8, Edited by: Smart, J. C., 143–233. New York: Agathon Press.
12. Nimmer, J. G., and Stone, E. F., 1991. Effects of grading practices and time of rating on student ratings of faculty performance and student learning. Research in Higher Education, 32: 195–215.
13. Rosenfeld, P., Booth-Kewley, S., and Edwards, J. E., 1993. Computer-administered surveys in organizational settings: Alternatives, advantages, and applications. American Behavioral Scientist, 36 (4): 485–511.
14. Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S., 1991. Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Wachtel, H. K., 1994. A critique of existing practices for evaluating mathematics instruction (Doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois at Chicago, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts International, 56 (01A): 0129
16. Wachtel, H. K., 1998. Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23 (2): 191–211.
17. Williams, W. M., and Ceci, S. J., 1997. “How'm I doing?” Problems with student ratings of instructors and courses. Change, 29 (5): 12–23.