Quantification of haemodynamic performance of stented and stentless aortic bioprostheses and potential influence on survival

Heart Lung and Circulation

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 149-156

  Jamieson, W R Eric ^a  

^a ST PAUL S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Aortic valve replacement; Effective orifice area index; Haemodynamic performance; Left ventricular mass

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; AORTA ROOT; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTERY DILATATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY STENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EXERCISE; EXPERIENCE; HEART ATRIOVENTRICULAR VALVE; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HEART MUSCLE BLOOD FLOW; HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REST; REVIEW; SHEAR STRESS; SURGEON; SURVIVAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0348161064     PISSN: 14439506     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1444-2892.2003.00208.x     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2000; 36: 1131-41.
2. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Jobin J, Cartier P, Honos G, Durand L-G. Hemodynamic and physical performance during maximal exercise in patients with sortic bioprosthetic valve position and its prevention. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1999; 34: 1609-17.
3. Fries R, Wendler O, Schieffer H, Schafers H-J. Comparative rest and exercise hemodynamics of 23-mm stentless versus 23-mm stented aortic bioprostheses. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2000; 69: 817-22.
4. Hasegawa J, Kitamura S, Taniguchi S et al. Comparative rest and exercise hemodynamics of allograft and prosthetic valves in the aortic position. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1997; 64: 1753-6.
5. Edmunds LH, Clark RE, Cohn LH, Grunkemeier GL, Miller DC, Weisel RD. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1996; 62: 932-5.
6. Williams RJ, Muir DF, Pathi V, MacArthur K, Berg GA. Randomized controlled trial of stented and stentless aortic bioprostheses: hemodynamic performance at 3 years. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1999; 11: 93-7.
7. Bach DS, Goldman B, Verrier E et al. Eight-year hemodynamic follow-up after aortic valve replacement with the Toronto SPV stentless aortic valve. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2001; 13: 173-9.
8. Basarir S, Islamoglu F, Ozkisacik E et al. Comparative analysis of left ventricular hemodynamics and hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement with homografts or mechanical valves. J. Heart Valve Dis. 2000; 9: 45-52.
9. Dagenais F, Cartier P, Dumesnil JG et al. A single center experience with the freestyle bioprosthesis: Midterm results at the Quebec Heart Institute. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2001; 13: 156-62.
10. David TE. The Toronto SPV bioprosthesis: Clinical and hemodynamic results at 6 years. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1999; 68: S9-13.
11. Dossche K, Vanermen H, Wellens F, De Geest R, Degrieck I, Deloof T. Free-hand sewn allografts, stentless (Prima Edwards) and stented (CESA) porcine bioprostheses. A comparative hemodynamic study. Eur. J. Cardio-thorac. Surg. 1995; 9: 562-6.
12. Doty DB, Cafferty A, Cartier P et al. Aortic valve replacement with Medtronic Freestyle bioprosthesis: 5-Year Results. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1999; 11: 35-41.
13. Eriksson MJ, Kallner G, Rosfors S, Ivert T, Brodin LA. Hemodynamic performance of cryopreserved aortic homografts valves during midterm follow-up. J. Am. Coll. Card. 1998; 32: 1002-8.
14. Rao V, Christakis G, Sever J et al. A novel comparison of stentless versus stented valves in the small aortic root. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1999; 117: 431-8.
15. David TE, Puschmann R, Ivanov J et al. Aortic valve replacement with stentless and stented porcine valves: a case-match study. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1998; 116: 236-41.
16. Del Rizzo DF, Abdoh A, Cartier PC, Doty D, Westaby S. The effect of prosthetic valve type on survival after aortic valve sugery. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1999; 11: 1-8.
17. Dumesnil JG, Yoganathan AP. Valve prosthesis hemodynamics and problem of high transprosthetic pressure gradients. Eur. J. Cardio-thoracic. Surg. 1992; 6: I34-8.
18. Yun KL, Jamieson WR, Khonsari S, Burr LH, Munro AI, Sintek CF. Prostheses-patient mismatch: hemodynamic comparison of stented and stentless aortic valves. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1999; 11: 98-102.
19. Braunwald E. Heart Disease. A text book of cardiovascular medicine. 1997; 1: 1035-45.
20. Walther T, Falk V, Langebartels G et al. Prospectively randomized evaluation of stentless versus conventional biological aortic valve: impact on early regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation 1999; 100 (Suppl. 11): 6-10.
21. Jin XV, Pillai R, Westaby S. Medium-term determinants of left ventricular mass index after stentless aortic valve replacement. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1999; 67: 411-16.
22. Del Rizzo DF, Abdoh A, Cartier PC, Doty D, Westaby S. Factors affecting left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with stentless valves. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1999; 11: 114-20.
23. Dellgren G, David TE, Raanani E, Bos J, Ivanov J, Rakowski H. The Toronto SPV: Hemodynamic data at 1 and 5 years post-implantation. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1999; 11: 107-13.
24. Jamieson WR, Janusz MT, MacNab J, Henderson C. Hemodynamic comparison of second and third generation porcine bioprostheses. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2001; 71: S282-4.
25. Thomson DJ, Jamieson WR, Dumesnil JG et al. Medtronic mosaic porcine bioprosthesis-mid-term investigational trial results. Ann. Thoracic. Surg. 2001; 71: S269-72.
26. Yacoub M, Rasmi NRH, Sundt TM et al. Fourteen-year experience with homovital homografts for aortic valve replacement. J Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1995; 110: 186-94.
27. Del Rizzo DF, Freed D, Abdoh A et al. Mid-term survival of stented versus stentless valves. Does concomitant CABG impact? Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasac. Surg. 2001; 13: 148.
28. Luciani GB, Bertolini P, Vecchi B, Mazzucco A. Re-operation on stentless aortic xenografts. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1988; 66: S104-9.
29. Luciani GB, Auriemma S, Santini F, Casali G, Barozzi L, Mazzucco A. Comparison of late outcome after stentless versus stented xenograft aortic valve replacement. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2001; 13: 136-42.
30. Jin XY, Westaby S. Aortic root geometry and stentless aortic xenografts. Ann. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1999; 11: 145-50.
31. Petracek MR, Shuman TA, Pirolo JS, Tedder M, Ball SK, Graves D. Use of Toronto stentless porcine valve in patients with aortic dilation. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1999; 11: 74-8.
32. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Cartier PC, Metras J, Lemieux MD. Patient-prosthesis mismatch can be predicted at the time of operation. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2001; 71: S265-8.