Proteomic Signatures: Amino Acid and Oligopeptide Compositions Differentiate among Phyla

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 20-40

  Pe'er, Itsik ^a   Felder, Clifford E ^a   Man, Orna ^a   Silman, Israel ^a,b   Sussman, Joel L ^a,c   Beckmann, Jacques S ^a,d  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^b Bernstein Mason Dept of Neurochem

^c M/G Pickman Dept Struct Biol   (Israel)

^d Hermann Mayer Dept of Molec Genet   (United States)

Author keywords

Phylogenetics; Principal component analysis; Proteome composition

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; OLIGOPEPTIDE; PEPTIDE DERIVATIVE; PROTEOME; TRIPEPTIDE;

AMINO ACID COMPOSITION; ARCHAEBACTERIUM; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM; BIOAVAILABILITY; CHEMISTRY; CHROMOSOME; CLASSIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EUKARYOTE; EUKARYOTIC CELL; GENE SEQUENCE; GENOME; HABITAT STRUCTURE; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEOMICS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; YEAST;

AMINO ACID MOTIFS; ARCHAEA; BACTERIA; EUKARYOTIC CELLS; OLIGOPEPTIDES; PHYLOGENY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN;

ARCHAEA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); EUKARYOTA;

EID: 0348047627     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.10559     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Gribaldo S, Philippe H. Ancient phylogenetic relationships. Theor Popul Biol 2002;61:391-408.
2. Kreil DP, Ouzounis CA. Identification of thermophilic species by the amino acid compositions deduced from their genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2001;29:1608-1615.
3. Tekaia F, Yeramian E, Dujon B. Amino acid composition of genomes, lifestyles of organisms, and evolutionary trends: A global picture with correspondence analysis. Gene 2002;297:51-60.
4. Karlin S, Brocchieri L, Trent J, Blaisdell BE, Mrazek J. Heterogeneity of genome and proteome content in bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes. Theor Popul Biol 2002;61:367-390.
5. Karlin S, Brocchieri L, Bergman A, Mrazek J, Gentles AJ. Amino acid runs in eukaryotic proteomes and disease associations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:333-338.
6. Korbel JO, Snel B, Huynen MA, Bork P. SHOT: A web server for the construction of genome phylogenies. Trends Genet 2002;18:158-162.
7. Tekaia F, Lazcano A, Dujon B. The genomic tree as revealed from whole proteome comparisons. Genome Res 1999;9:550-557.
8. Ling L, Wang J, Cui Y, Li W, Chen R. Proteome-wide analysis of protein function composition reveals the clustering and phylogenetic properties of organisms. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2002;25:101-111.
9. Wolf YI, Rogozin IB, Grishin NV, Koonin EV. Genome trees and the tree of life. Trends Genet 2002;18:472-479.
10. Echols N, Harrison P, Balasubramanian S, Luscombe NM, Bertone P, Zhang Z, Gerstein M. Comprehensive analysis of amino acid and nucleotide composition in eukaryotic genomes, comparing genes and pseudogenes. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30:2515-2523.
11. Stuart GW, Moffett K, Leader JJ. A comprehensive vertebrate phylogeny using vector representations of protein sequences from whole genomes. Mol Biol Evol 2002;19:554-562.
12. Karlin S, Burge C. Dinucleotide relative abundance extremes: A genomic signature. Trends Genet 1995;11:283-290.
13. Joliffe IT, Morgan BJ. Principal component analysis and exploratory factor analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 1992;1:69-95.
14. Vieille C, Zeikus GJ. Hyperthermophilic enzymes: Sources, uses, and molecular mechanisms for thermostability. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2001;65:1-43.
15. Johnson SC. Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika 1967;32:241-254.
16. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987;4:406-425.
17. Gentles AJ, Karlin S. Genome-scale compositional comparisons in eukaryotes. Genome Res 2001;11:540-546.
18. Galtier N, Lobry JR. Relationships between genomic G+C content, RNA secondary structures, and optimal growth temperature in prokaryotes. J Mol Evol 1997;44:632-636.
19. Buckley DH, Graber JR, Schmidt TM. Phylogenetic analysis of nonthermophilic members of the kingdom crenarchaeota and their diversity and abundance in soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 1998;64:4333-4339.
20. Preston CM, Wu KY, Molinski TF, DeLong EF. A psychrophilic crenarchaeon inhabits a marine sponge: Cenarchaeum syrnbiosum gen. nov., sp. nov. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996;93:6241-6246.
21. Uversky VN, Gillespie JR, Fink AL. Why are "natively unfolded" proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions? Proteins 2000;41:415-427.
22. Dunker AK, Obradovic Z. The protein trinity-linking function and disorder. Nat Biotechnol 2001;19:805-806.
23. Wright PE, Dyson HJ. Intrinsically unstructured proteins: Re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. J Mol Biol 1999;293:321-331.
24. Romero P, Obradovic Z, Li X, Garner EC, Brown CJ, Dunker AK. Sequence complexity of disordered proteins. Proteins 2001;42:38-48.
25. Karlin S, Chen C, Gentles AJ, Cleary M. Associations between human disease genes and overlapping gene groups and multiple amino acid runs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:17008-17013.
26. Perutz MF. Glutamine repeats and neurodegenerative diseases: Molecular aspects. Trends Biochem Sci 1999;24:58-63.
27. Gerstein M. A structural census of genomes: Comparing bacterial, eukaryotic, and archaeal genomes in terms of protein structure. J Mol Biol 1997;274:562-576.
28. Kay BK, Williamson MP, and Sudol M. The importance of being proline: The interaction of proline-rich motifs in signaling proteins with their cognate domains. FASEB J 2000;14:231-241.
29. Simon S, Krejci E, Massoulie J. A four-to-one association between peptide motifs: Four C-terminal domains from cholinesterase assemble with one proline-rich attachment domain (PRAD) in the secretory pathway. EMBO J 1998;17:6178-6187.
30. Perrier AL, Massoulie J, Krejci E. PRiMA: The membrane anchor of acetylcholinesterase in the brain. Neuron 2002;33:275-285.
31. van de Vossenberg JL, Driessen AJ, Konings WN. The essence of being extremophilic: The role of the unique archaeal membrane lipids. Extremophiles 1998;2:163-170.
32. Hedges SB. The origin and evolution of model organisms. Nat Rev Genet 2002;3:838-849.
33. Brown JR. Ancient horizontal gene transfer. Nat Rev Genet 2003;4:121-132.
34. EBI proteomic database at ftp://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/spproteomes/fasta_files/proteomes/, December 2002.
35. The COG database at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG/, November 2002.
36. NCBI taxonomy browser at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/taxonomyhome.html/, December 2002.
37. The rat genome database at ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlh.gov/genomes/R_norvegicus/rn_protnr.gz, July 2002.
38. The mosquito genome database at ftp://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/current_mosquito/data/fasta/pep/Anopheles_gambiae. MOZ2. pep.fa.gz
39. vi. The fugu genome database at ftp://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/current_fugu/data/fasta/pep/Fugu_rubripes. FUGU2.pep.fa.gz, (fugu-9.1), November 2002.
40. vii. The rice genome database at ftp://ftp.tigr.org/pub/data/Eukaryotic_Projects/o_sativa/annotation_dbs/OSA1. pep, December 2002.
41. viii. The ciona genome database at ftp://ftp.jgi-psf.org/pub/JGI_data/Ciona/v1.0/ciona.prot.fasta.gz, December 2002.
42. http://www.weizmann.ac.il/~joel/papers/suppl/peer_2003