DNA Sequence Bias during Tn5 Transposition

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 335, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 1213-1225

  Ason, Brandon ^a   Reznikoff, William S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

DNase I footprinting; Donor DNA; Strand transfer; Tn5; Transposase

Indexed keywords

DEOXYRIBONUCLEASE I; TRANSPOSASE;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CATALYSIS; CHROMOSOME PAIRING; DNA FOOTPRINTING; DNA SEQUENCE; DNA STRAND; DNA TRANSFER; DNA TRANSPOSITION; ENZYME DEGRADATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN DNA INTERACTION; TRANSPOSON;

INSERTION SEQUENCES; TRANSPOSONS;

EID: 0347914559     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.11.039     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Bushman F. Lateral DNA Transfer. 1 edit. 2002;Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
2. Berg, D. E. & Howe, M. M. (eds) (1989). 1 edit., American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
3. Nancy L., Craig R.C., Gellert M., Lambowitz A.M. Mobile DNA II. 2002;ASM Press, Washington, DC.
4. Goryshin I.Y., Reznikoff W.S. Tn5 in vitro transposition. J. Biol. Chem. 273:1998;7367-7374.
5. Naumann T.A., Reznikoff W.S. Tn5 transposase active site mutants. J. Biol. Chem. 277:2002;17623-17629.
6. Naumann T.A., Reznikoff W.S. Trans catalysis in Tn5 transposition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 97:2000;8944-8949.
7. Mizuuchi M., Baker T.A., Mizuuchi K. Assembly of the active form of the transposase-Mu DNA complex: a critical control point in Mu transposition. Cell. 70:1992;303-311.
8. Williams T.L., Jackson E.L., Carritte A., Baker T.A. Organization and dynamics of the Mu transpososome: recombination by communication between two active sites. Genes Dev. 13:1999;2725-2737.
9. Swanson P.C. The DDE motif in RAG-1 is contributed in trans to a single active site that catalyzes the nicking and transesterification steps of V(D)J recombination. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:2001;449-458.
10. Bhasin A., Goryshin I.Y., Reznikoff W.S. Hairpin formation in Tn5 transposition. J. Biol. Chem. 274:1999;37021-37029.
11. Kennedy A.K., Guhathakurta A., Kleckner N., Haniford D.B. Tn10 transposition via a DNA hairpin intermediate. Cell. 95:1998;125-134.
12. McBlane J.F., van Gent D.C., Ramsden D.A., Romeo C., Cuomo C.A., Gellert M., Oettinger M.A. Cleavage at a V(D)J recombination signal requires only RAG1 and RAG2 proteins and occurs in two steps. Cell. 83:1995;387-395.
13. Colot V., Haedens V., Rossignol J.L. Extensive, nonrandom diversity of excision footprints generated by Ds-like transposon Ascot-1 suggests new parallels with V(D)J recombination. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:1998;4337-4346.
14. Johnson R.C., Reznikoff W.S. DNA sequences at the ends of transposon Tn5 required for transposition. Nature. 304:1983;280-282.
15. Davies D.R., Goryshin I.Y., Reznikoff W.S., Rayment I. Three-dimensional structure of the Tn5 synaptic complex transposition intermediate. Science. 289:2000;77-85.
16. Rice P.A., Baker T.A. Comparative architecture of transposase and integrase complexes. Nature Struct. Biol. 8:2001;302-307.
17. Wu Z., Chaconas G. Flanking host sequences can exert an inhibitory effect on the cleavage step of the in vitro mu DNA strand transfer reaction. J. Biol. Chem. 267:1992;9552-9558.
18. Goryshin I.Y., Miller J.A., Kil Y.V., Lanzov V.A., Reznikoff W.S. Tn5/IS50 target recognition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 95:1998;10716-10721.
19. Shevchenko Y., Bouffard G.G., Butterfield Y.S., Blakesley R.W., Hartley J.L., Young A.C., et al. Systematic sequencing of cDNA clones using the transposon Tn5. Nucl. Acids Res. 30:2002;2469-2477.
20. Lodge J.K., Weston-Hafer K., Berg D.E. Tn5 insertion specificity is not influenced by IS50 end sequences in target DNA. Mol. Gen. Genet. 228:1991;312-315.
21. Lodge J.K., Weston-Hafer K., Berg D.E. Transposon Tn5 target specificity: preference for insertion at G/C pairs. Genetics. 120:1988;645-650.
22. Berg D.E., Schmandt M.A., Lowe J.B. Specificity of transposon Tn5 insertion. Genetics. 105:1983;813-828.
23. Bhasin A., Goryshin I.Y., Steiniger-White M., York D., Reznikoff W.S. Characterization of a Tn5 pre-cleavage synaptic complex. J. Mol. Biol. 302:2000;49-63.
24. Fox K.R. Walker J.M. Drug-DNA Interaction Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology. vol. 90:1997;Humana Press, Totowa.
25. Thompson S. Sample size for estimating multinominal proportions. Am. Stat. 41:1987;42-46.
26. Segel I.H. Enzyme Kinetics. 1975;Wiley, New York.
27. Lavoie B.D., Chan B.S., Allison R.G., Chaconas G. Structural aspects of a higher order nucleoprotein complex: induction of an altered DNA structure at the Mu-host junction of the Mu type 1 transpososome. EMBO J. 10:1991;3051-3059.
28. Mizuuchi M., Baker T.A., Mizuuchi K. DNase protection analysis of the stable synaptic complexes involved in Mu transposition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 88:1991;9031-9035.
29. Sewitz S., Crellin P., Chalmers R. The positive and negative regulation of Tn10 transposition by IHF is mediated by structurally asymmetric transposon arms. Nucl. Acids Res. 31:2003;5868-5876.
30. Jilk R.A., York D., Reznikoff W.S. The organization of the outside end of transposon Tn5. J. Bacteriol. 178:1996;1671-1679.
31. York D., Reznikoff W.S. DNA binding and phasing analyses of Tn5 transposase and a monomeric variant. Nucl. Acids Res. 25:1997;2153-2160.
32. Ason B., Reznikoff W.S. Mutational analysis of the base flipping event found in Tn5 transposition. J. Biol. Chem. 277:2002;11284-11291.
33. Chalmers R., Guhathakurta A., Benjamin H., Kleckner N. IHF modulation of Tn10 transposition: sensory transduction of supercoiling status via a proposed protein/DNA molecular spring. Cell. 93:1998;897-908.
34. Zayed H., Izsvak Z., Khare D., Heinemann U., Ivics Z. The DNA-bending protein HMGB1 is a cellular cofactor of Sleeping Beauty transposition. Nucl. Acids Res. 31:2003;2313-2322.
35. Kobryn K., Watson M.A., Allison R.G., Chaconas G. The Mu three-site synapse: a strained assembly platform in which delivery of the L1 transposase binding site triggers catalytic commitment. Mol. Cell. 10:2002;659-669.
36. Lee I., Harshey R.M. The conserved CA/TG motif at Mu termini: T specifies stable transpososome assembly. J. Mol. Biol. 330:2003;261-275.
37. Allingham J.S., Wardle S.J., Haniford D.B. Determinants for hairpin formation in Tn10 transposition. EMBO J. 20:2001;2931-2942.
38. Allingham J.S., Haniford D.B. Mechanisms of metal ion action in Tn10 transposition. J. Mol. Biol. 319:2002;53-65.
39. Crellin P., Chalmers R. Protein-DNA contacts and conformational changes in the Tn10 transpososome during assembly and activation for cleavage. EMBO J. 20:2001;3882-3891.
40. Wang Z., Namgoong S.Y., Zhang X., Harshey R.M. Kinetic and structural probing of the precleavage synaptic complex (type 0) formed during phage Mu transposition. Action of metal ions and reagents specific to single-stranded DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 271:1996;9619-9626.
41. Gamas P., Chandler M.G., Prentki P., Galas D.J. Escherichia coli integration host factor binds specifically to the ends of the insertion sequence IS1 and to its major insertion hot-spot in pBR322. J. Mol. Biol. 195:1987;261-272.
42. Galas D.J., Calos M.P., Miller J.H. Sequence analysis of Tn9 insertions in the lacZ gene. J. Mol. Biol. 144:1980;19-41.
43. Tu C.P., Cohen S.N. Translocation specificity of the Tn3 element: characterization of sites of multiple insertions. Cell. 19:1980;151-160.
44. Lupski J.R., Gershon P., Ozaki L.S., Godson G.N. Specificity of Tn5 insertions into a 36-bp DNA sequence repeated in tandem seven times. Gene. 30:1984;99-106.
45. Bossi L., Ciampi M.S. DNA sequences at the sites of three insertions of the transposable element Tn5 in the histidine operon of Salmonella. Mol. Gen. Genet. 183:1981;406-408.
46. Lodge J.K., Berg D.E. Mutations that affect Tn5 insertion into pBR322: importance of local DNA supercoiling. J. Bacteriol. 172:1990;5956-5960.
47. Arciszewska L.K., Drake D., Craig N.L. Transposon Tn7. cis-Acting sequences in transposition and transposition immunity. J. Mol. Biol. 207:1989;35-52.
48. Adzuma K., Mizuuchi K. Interaction of proteins located at a distance along DNA: mechanism of target immunity in the Mu DNA strand-transfer reaction. Cell. 57:1989;41-47.
49. Adzuma K., Mizuuchi K. Target immunity of Mu transposition reflects a differential distribution of Mu B protein. Cell. 53:1988;257-266.
50. Pribil P.A., Haniford D.B. Target DNA bending is an important specificity determinant in target site selection in Tn10 transposition. J. Mol. Biol. 330:2003;247-259.
51. Morisato D., Kleckner N. Tn10 transposition and circle formation in vitro. Cell. 51:1987;101-111.