Biomechanical considerations of animal models used in tissue engineering of bone

Biomaterials

Volumn 25, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 1697-1714

  Liebschner, Michael A K ^a  

^a Rice University   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal model; Biomechanics; Bone hierarchy; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIALS; BIOMECHANICS; CELLS; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

TISSUE ENGINEERING;

TISSUE;

BIOMECHANICS; BODY WEIGHT; BONE DEFORMATION; BONE DENSITY; BONE STRESS; BONE TISSUE; CYTOLOGY; GAIT; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; TISSUE ENGINEERING; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0347753912     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00515-5     Document Type: Article

References (172)

1. Bronner F, Worrell RV (eds.), Orthopaedics, principles of basic and clinical science. Boca Raton, FL; 1999, CRC.
2. Frost HM. Introduction to a new skeletal physiology, vol. I and II. 1995, Pueblo: Pajaro Group.
3. Jee WSS. Structure and function of bone tissue. In: Bronner F, Worrell RV, editors. Orthopaedics, principles of basic and clinical science, Boca Raton, FL: CRS Press; 1999. [Chapter 1].
4. Martin R.B. The effects of geometric feedback in the development of osteoporosis. J Biomech. 5(5):1972;447-455.
5. Rogers H.J., Weidmann S.M., Parkinson A. Studies on the skeletal tissues - II. The collagen content of bones from rabbits, oxen, and humans. Biochem J. 50:1952;537.
6. Smith J.W. Collagen fiber patterns in mammalian bone. J Anat. 94:1960;329.
7. Parfitt A.M. The physiologic and clinical significance of bone histomorphometric data. Recker R.R. Bone histomorphometry: techniques and interpretation. 1983;143-223 CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
8. Eriksen E.F., Axelrod D.W., Melsen F. Bone histomorphometry. 1994;Raven Press, New York.
9. Martin R.B., Burr D.B. Structure, function, and adaptation of compact bone. 1st ed:1989;Raven Press, New York.
10. Ashman R.B. Experimental techniques. Cowin S.C. Bone mechanics. 1989;75-95 CRC Press, U.S.A.
11. Spatz H.C., O'Leary E.J., Vincent J.F. Young's moduli and shear moduli in cortical bone. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 263(1368):1996;287-294.
12. Bartley M.H. Jret al. The relationship of bone strength and bone quantity in health, disease, and aging. J Gerontol. 21(4):1966;517-521.
13. Banse X.et al. Comparative left-right mechanical testing of cancellous bone from normal femoral heads. J Biomech. 29(10):1996;1247-1253.
14. Evans F.G., Band S. Differences and relationships between the physical properties and the relationships between the physical properties and the microscopic structure of human femoral, tibial, and fibular cortical bone. Am J Anat. 120:1967;79.
15. Gibson L.J. The mechanical behavior of cancellous bone. J Biomech. 18(5):1985;317-328.
16. Goldstein S.A. The mechanical properties of trabecular bone. dependence on anatomic location and function J Biomech. 20(11/12):1987;1055-1061.
17. Martin R.B., Atkinson P.J. Age and sex-related changes in the structure and strength of the human femoral shaft. J Biomech. 10(4):1977;223-231.
18. Welch D.O. The composite structure of bone and its response to mechanical stress. Recent Adv Eng Sci. 5:1970;245.
19. Harrigan T.P.et al. Limitations of the continuum assumption in cancellous bone. J Biomech. 21(4):1988;269-275.
20. Goldstein S.A.et al. The mechanical properties of human tibial trabecular bone as a function of metaphyseal location. J Biomech. 16(12):1983;965-969.
21. Ciarelli M.J.et al. Evaluation of orthogonal mechanical properties and density of human trabecular bone from the major metaphyseal regions with materials testing and computed tomography. J Orthop Res. 9(5):1991;674-682.
22. Kuhn J.L.et al. The limitations of canine trabecular bone as a model for human. a biomechanical study J Biomech. 22(2):1989;95-107.
23. Wong M.et al. Aggrecan core protein is expressed in membranous bone of the chick embryo. Molecular and biomechanical studies of normal and nanomelia embryos. J Biol Chem. 267(8):1992;5592-5598.
24. Tseng K.F.et al. Local expression of human growth hormone in bone results in impaired mechanical integrity in the skeletal tissue of transgenic mice. J Orthop Res. 14(4):1996;598-604.
25. Jepsen K.J.et al. Type I collagen mutation alters the strength and fatigue behavior of Mov13 cortical tissue. J Biomech. 30(11-12):1997;1141-1147.
26. Tseng K.F., Goldstein S.A. Systemic over-secretion of growth hormone in transgenic mice results in a specific pattern of skeletal modeling and adaptation. J Bone Miner Res. 13(4):1998;706-715.
27. Townsend P.R., Rose R.M., Radin E.L. Buckling studies of single human trabeculae. J Biomech. 8(3-4):1975;199-201.
28. Rho J.Y., Ashman R.B., Turner C.H. Young's modulus of trabecular and cortical bone material. ultrasonic and microtensile measurements J Biomech. 26:1993;111-119.
29. Choi K., Goldstein S.A. A comparison of the fatigue behavior of human trabecular and cortical bone tissue. J Biomech. 25(12):1992;1371-1381.
30. Choi K.et al. The elastic moduli of human subchondral, trabecular, and cortical bone tissue and the size-dependency of cortical bone modulus. J Biomech. 23(11):1990;1103-1113.
31. Zysset P.K.et al. Mechanical properties of human trabecular bone lamellae quantified by nanoindentation. Technol Health Care. 6(5-6):1998;429-432.
32. Lips P. Epidemiology and predictors of fractures associated with osteoporosis. Am J Med 1997;103(2A):3S-8S; discussion 8S-11S.
33. Hoffler CE, Moore KE, Kozloff KM. Femoral neck bone lamellae elastic properties are independent of age and gender. Trans Orthop Res Soc, 1999.
34. Oxlund H.et al. Reduced concentrations of collagen cross-links are associated with reduced strength of bone. Bone. 17(4 Suppl):1995;365S-371S.
35. Ascenzi A., Benvenuti A., Bonucci E. The tensile properties of single osteonic lamellae. technical problems and preliminary results J Biomech. 15(1):1982;29-37.
36. Reilly D.T., Burstein A.H. The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J Biomech. 8:1975;393-405.
37. Fondrk M.et al. Some viscoplastic characteristics of bovine and human cortical bone. J Biomech. 21(8):1988;623-630.
38. Rice J.C., Cowin S.C., Bowman J.A. On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. J Biomech. 21(2):1988;155-168.
39. Rohl L.et al. Tensile and compressive properties of cancellous bone. J Biomech. 24(12):1991;1143-1149.
40. Stone J.L., Beaupre G.S., Hayes W.C. Multiaxial strength characteristics of trabecular bone. J Biomech. 16(9):1983;743-752.
41. Ashman R.B., Rho J.Y. Elastic modulus of trabecular bone material. J Biomech. 21(3):1988;177-181.
42. Reilly D.T., Burstein A.H., Frankel V.H. The elastic modulus for bone. J Biomech. 7:1974;271-275.
43. McBroom R.J.et al. Prediction of vertebral body compressive fracture using quantitative computed tomography. J Bone Jt Surg. 67-A(8):1985;1206-1214.
44. Keller TS, Liebschner MAK. Tensile and compression testing of bone. In: An YH, Draughn RA, editors. Mechanical testing of bone and the bone-implant interface. Boca Rotan, FL: CRC Press; 2000.
45. Linde F., Hvid I., Pongsoipetch B. Energy absorptive properties of human trabecular bone specimens during axial compression. J Orthop Res. 7(3):1989;432-439.
46. Ashman R.B., Rho J.Y., Turner C.H. Anatomical variation of orthotropic elastic moduli of the proximal human tibia. J Biomech. 22(8-9):1989;895-900.
47. Turner C.H.et al. The fabric dependence of the orthotropic elastic constants of cancellous bone. J Biomech. 23:1990;549.
48. Hou F.J.et al. Human vertebral body apparent and hard tissue stiffness. J Biomech. 31(11):1998;1009-1015.
49. Van Rietbergen B.et al. A new method to determine trabecular bone elastic properties and loading using micromechanical finite element models. J Biomech. 28(1):1995;69-81.
50. Van Rietbergen B.et al. Relationships between bone morphology and bone elastic properties can be accurately quantified using high-resolution computer reconstructions. J Orthop Res. 16(1):1998;23-28.
51. Ladd A.J.et al. Finite-element modeling of trabecular bone. comparison with mechanical testing and determination of tissue modulus J Orthop Res. 16(5):1998;622-628.
52. Niebur G.L.et al. High-resolution finite element models with tissue strength asymmetry accurately predict failure of trabecular bone. J Biomech. 33:2000;1575-1583.
53. Lanyon L.E., Smith R.N. Bone strain in the tibia during normal quadrupedal locomotion. Acta Orthop Scand. 41(3):1970;238-248.
54. Cochran G.V. Implantation of strain gages on bone in vivo. J Biomech. 5(1):1972;119-123.
55. Lanyon L.E.et al. Bone deformation recorded in vivo from strain gauges attached to the human tibial shaft. Acta Orthop Scand. 46(2):1975;256-268.
56. Burr D.B.et al. In vivo measurement of human tibial strains during vigorous activity. Bone. 18(5):1996;405-410.
57. Rubin C.T., Lanyon L.E. Limb mechanics as a function of speed and gait. a study of functional strains in the radius and tibia of horse and dog J Exp Biol. 101:1982;187-211.
58. Nunamaker D.M., Butterweck D.M., Provost M.T. Fatigue fractures in thoroughbred racehorses. relationships with age, peak bone strain, and training J Orthop Res. 8(4):1990;604-611.
59. Keaveny T.M.et al. Differences between the tensile and compressive strengths of bovine tibial trabecular bone depend on modulus. J Biomech. 27:1994;1137-1146.
60. Turner C.H. Yield behavior of bovine cancellous bone. J Biomech Eng. 111(3):1989;256-260.
61. Carter D.R., Hayes W.C. Bone compressive strength. the influence of density and strain rate Science. 194(4270):1976;1174-1176.
62. Hunziker E.B. Articular cartilage repair. are the intrinsic biological constraints undermining this process insuperable? Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 7(1):1999;15-28.
63. Callewart CC, Kanim LEA, Dawson EG. Evaluation of the canine spinal fusion method. In: North American Spine Society Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, October 1993.
64. Urist M.R. Bone. formation by autoinduction Science. 150(698):1965;893- 899.
65. Urist M.R.et al. The bone induction principle. Clin Orthop. 53:1967;243-283.
66. Oikarinen J, Korhonen LK. The bone inductive capacity of various bone transplanting materials used for treatment of experimental bone defects. Clin Orthop 1979;May(140):208-15.
67. Passuti N, et al. Macroporous calcium phosphate ceramic performance in human spine fusion. Clin Orthop 1989;November(248):169-76.
68. Lindholm TS, Nilsson OS, Lindholm TC. Extraskeletal and intraskeletal new bone formation induced by demineralized bone matrix combined with bone marrow cells. Clin Orthop 1982;November-December(171):251-55.
69. Lindholm TS, Ragni P, Lindholm TC. Response of bone marrow stroma cells to demineralized cortical bone matrix in experimental spinal fusion in rabbits. Clin Orthop 1988;May(230):296-302.
70. Oikarinen J. Experimental spinal fusion with decalcified bone matrix and deep-frozen allogeneic bone in rabbits. Clin Orthop 1982;January-February(162): 210-8.
71. Ragni P., Lindholm T.S., Lindholm T.C. Vertebral fusion dynamics in the thoracic and lumbar spine induced by allogenic demineralized bone matrix combined with autogenous bone marrow. An experimental study in rabbits. Ital J Orthop Traumatol. 13(2):1987;241-251.
72. Ragni P.C., Lindholm T.S. Bone formation and static changes in the thoracic spine at uni- or bilateral experimental spondylodesis with demineralized bone matrix (DBM). Ital J Orthop Traumatol. 15(2):1989;237-252.
73. Burwell RG. The function of bone marrow in the incorporation of a bone graft. Clin Orthop 1985;November(200):125-41.
74. Hurley L.A.et al. The role of soft tissues in osteogenesis. an experimental study of canine spine fusions J Bone J Surg [Am]. 41:1959;1243-1254.
75. Muschler G.F.et al. Evaluation of bone-grafting materials in a new canine segmental spinal fusion model. J Orthop Res. 11(4):1993;514-524.
76. Albee F.H. An experimental study of bone growth and the spinal bone transplant. JAMA. 60:1913;1044-1049.
77. Frenkel S.R.et al. Demineralized bone matrix. Enhancement of spinal fusion. Spine. 18(12):1993;1634-1639.
78. Lovell TP, et al. Augmentation of spinal fusion with bone morphogenetic protein in dogs. Clin Orthop 1989;June(243):266-74.
79. Tsuang Y.H.et al. Experimental allograft in spinal fusion in dogs. Taiwan Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi. 88(10):1989;989-994.
80. Rauch F.et al. Temporal and spatial expression of bone morphogenetic protein-2, -4, and -7 during distraction osteogenesis in rabbits. Bone. 27(3):2000;453-459.
81. Guizzardi S.et al. Implants of heterologous demineralized bone matrix for induction of posterior spinal fusion in rats. Spine. 17(6):1992;701-707.
82. Aspenberg P., Wang E., Thorngren K.G. Bone morphogenetic protein induces bone in the squirrel monkey, but bone matrix does not. Acta Orthop Scand. 63(6):1992;619-622.
83. Takagi K, Urist MR. The role of bone marrow in bone morphogenetic protein-induced repair of femoral massive diaphyseal defects. Clin Orthop 1982;(171): 224-31.
84. Yasko A.W.et al. The healing of segmental bone defects, induced by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2). A radiographic, histological, and biomechanical study in rats. Jt Bone Jt Surg Am. 74(5):1992;659-670.
85. Kotani S, et al. Enhancement of bone bonding to bioactive ceramics by demineralized bone powder. Clin Orthop 1992;May(278):226-34.
86. Oberg S., Rosenquist J.B. Bone healing after implantation of hydroxyapatite granules and blocks (Interpore 200) combined with autolyzed antigen-extracted allogeneic bone and fibrin glue. Experimental studies on adult rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 23(2):1994;110-114.
87. Li G.et al. Expression of BMP-4 mRNA during distraction osteogenesis in rabbits. Acta Orthop Scand. 69(4):1998;420-425.
88. da Costa Filho L.C., Taga R., Taga E.M. Rabbit bone marrow response to bovine osteoinductive proteins and anorganic bovine bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 16(6):2001;799-808.
89. Teixeira J.O., Urist M.R. Bone morphogenetic protein induced repair of compartmentalized segmental diaphyseal defects. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 117(1-2):1998;27-34.
90. Nishimura T., Simmons D.J., Mainous E.G. The origin of bone formed by heterotopic periosteal autografts. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 55(11):1997;1265- 1268.
91. Bostrom M, et al. Use of bone morphogenetic protein-2 in the rabbit ulnar nonunion model. Clin Orthop 1996;(327):272-82.
92. Jelic M.et al. Regeneration of articular cartilage chondral defects by osteogenic protein-1 (bone morphogenetic protein-7) in sheep. Growth Factors. 19(2):2001;101-113.
93. Gao T.J.et al. Enhanced healing of segmental tibial defects in sheep by a composite bone substitute composed of tricalcium phosphate cylinder, bone morphogenetic protein, and type IV collagen. J Biomed Mater Res. 32(4):1996;505-512.
94. Toth J.M.et al. Evaluation of 70/30 poly (L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide) for use as a resorbable interbody fusion cage. J Neurosurg. 97(4 Suppl):2002;423-432.
95. Kandziora F.et al. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 application by a poly(D,L-lactide)-coated interbody cage. in vivo results of a new carrier for growth factors J Neurosurg. 97(1 Suppl):2002;40-48.
96. Sandhu H.S.et al. Histologic evaluation of the efficacy of rhBMP-2 compared with autograft bone in sheep spinal anterior interbody fusion. Spine. 27(6):2002;567-575.
97. Paar O.et al. [Value of human recombinant osteogenetic proteins as bone replacement materials in lumbar spondylodesis. Results of an animal experiment study]. Unfallchirurg. 104(8):2001;700-709.
98. Magin M.N., Delling G. Improved lumbar vertebral interbody fusion using rhOP-1. a comparison of autogenous bone graft, bovine hydroxylapatite (Bio-Oss), and BMP-7 (rhOP-1) in sheep Spine. 26(5):2001;469-478.
99. Cunningham B.W.et al. Osteogenic protein versus autologous interbody arthrodesis in the sheep thoracic spine. A comparative endoscopic study using the Bagby and Kuslich interbody fusion device. Spine. 24(6):1999;509-518.
100. Toriumi D.M.et al. Mandibular reconstruction with a recombinant bone-inducing factor. Functional, histologic, and biomechanical evaluation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 117(10):1991;1101-1112.
101. Cook S.D.et al. Healing course of primate ulna segmental defects treated with osteogenic protein-1. J Invest Surg. 15(2):2002;69-79.
102. Boyne PJ. Application of bone morphogenetic proteins in the treatment of clinical oral and maxillofacial osseous defects. J Bone J Surg Am 2001;83-A(Suppl 1(Part 2)):S146-50.
103. Schimandle J.H., Boden S.D. Spine update. The use of animal models to study spinal fusion. Spine. 19(17):1994;1998-2006.
104. Gao J.et al. Repair of osteochondral defect with tissue-engineered two-phase composite material of injectable calcium phosphate and hyaluronan sponge. Tissue Eng. 8(5):2002;827-837.
105. Evans CH, Robbins PD. Genetically augmented tissue engineering of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop 1999;(367 Suppl): S410-8.
106. Kang R, et al. The Marshall R. Urist Young Investigator Award. Orthopaedic applications of gene therapy. From concept to clinic. Clin Orthop 2000;(375): 324-37.
107. Sandhu H.S.et al. Experimental spinal fusion with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 without decortication of osseous elements. Spine. 22(11):1997;1171-1180.
108. Sandhu H.S.et al. Evaluation of rhBMP-2 with an OPLA carrier in a canine posterolateral (transverse process) spinal fusion model. Spine. 20(24):1995;2669-2682.
109. Schimandle J.H., Boden S.D. Spine update. Animal use in spinal research. Spine. 19(21):1994;2474-2477.
110. Cowin SC, Van Buskirk WC, Ashman RB. Handbook of Engineering Skalak, RACS, editor. McGraw-Hill: New York; 1987.
111. Lanyon L.E. Analysis of surface bone strain in the calcaneus of sheep during normal locomotion. Strain analysis of the calcaneus. J Biomech. 6(1):1973;41-49.
112. Carter D.R., Spengler D.M. Mechanical properties and composition of cortical bone. Clin Orthop. 135(135):1978;192-217.
113. Currey J.D. Mechanical properties of vertebrate hard tissues. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 212(6):1998;399-411.
114. Ascenzi A, Bonucci E. The compressive properties of single osteons as a problem of molecular biology. Calcif Tissue Res 1968: (Suppl: 44-44a).
115. Burstein A.H., Reilly D.T., Martens M. Aging of bone tissue. mechanical properties J Bone Jt Surg Am. 58(1):1976;82-86.
116. Vincentelli R., Grigorov M. The effect of Haversian remodeling on the tensile properties of human cortical bone. J Biomech. 18(3):1985;201-207.
117. Yamada H. Strength of biological materials. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins. 1970.
118. Cezayirlioglu H.et al. Anisotropic yield behavior of bone under combined axial force and torque. J Biomech. 18(1):1985;61-69.
119. Keller T.S., Mao Z., Spengler D.M. Young's modulus, bending strength, and tissue physical properties of human compact bone [see comments]. J Orthop Res. 8(4):1990;592-603.
120. McElhaney J.H.et al. Effect of embalming on the mechanical properties of beef bone. J Appl Physiol. 19:1964;1234.
121. Burstein A.H.et al. The ultimate properties of bone tissue. the effects of yielding J Biomech. 5(1):1972;35-44.
122. Ascenzi A., Bonucci E. The tensile properties of single osteons. Anat Rec. 158(4):1967;375-386.
123. Simkin A., Robin G. The mechanical testing of bone in bending. J Biomech. 6(1):1973;31-39.
124. Burstein A.H.et al. Contribution of collagen and mineral to the elastic-plastic properties of bone. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 57(7):1975;956-961.
125. Martin R.B., Boardman D.L. The effects of collagen fiber orientation, porosity, density, and mineralization on bovine cortical bone bending properties. J Biomech. 26(9):1993;1047-1054.
126. Schryver H.F. Bending properties of cortical bone of the horse. Am J Vet Res. 39(1):1978;25-28.
127. Currey J.D. The effect of porosity and mineral content on the Young's modulus of elasticity of compact bone. J Biomech. 21(2):1988;131-139.
128. An Y.H., Kang Q., Friedman R.J. Mechanical symmetry of rabbit bones studied by bending and indentation testing. Am J Vet Res. 57(12):1996;1786-1789.
129. Ayers R.A.et al. Correlation of flexural structural properties with bone physical properties. a four species survey Biomed Sci Instrum. 32:1996;251-260.
130. Jorgensen P.H., Bak B., Andreassen T.T. Mechanical properties and biochemical composition of rat cortical femur and tibia after long-term treatment with biosynthetic human growth hormone. Bone. 12(5):1991;353-359.
131. Barengolts E.I.et al. Effects of endurance exercise on bone mass and mechanical properties in intact and ovariectomized rats. J Bone Miner Res. 8(8):1993;937-942.
132. Ejersted C.et al. Human parathyroid hormone (1-34) and (1-84) increase the mechanical strength and thickness of cortical bone in rats. J Bone Miner Res. 8(9):1993;1097-1101.
133. Simske S.J.et al. The physical and mechanical effects of suspension-induced osteopenia on mouse long bones. J Biomech. 25(5):1992;489-499.
134. Martens M.et al. The mechanical characteristics of cancellous bone at the upper femoral region. J Biomech. 16(12):1983;971-983.
135. Rohlmann A.et al. Material properties of femoral cancellous bone in axial loading. Part I. time independent properties Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 97(2):1980;95-102.
136. Carter D.R., Hayes W.C. The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J Bone Jt Surg. 59-A:1977;954-962.
137. Keaveny T.M.et al. Systematic and random errors in compression testing of trabecular bone. J Orthop Res. 15(1):1997;101-110.
138. Kopperdahl D.L., Keaveny T.M. Yield strain behavior of trabecular bone. J Biomech. 31(7):1998;601-608.
139. Mosekilde L., Mosekilde L. Normal vertebral body size and compressive strength. relations to age and to vertebral and iliac trabecular bone compressive strength Bone. 7:1986;207-212.
140. Keller T.S. Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone. J Biomech. 27(9):1994;1159-1168.
141. Kasra M., Grynpas M.D. Effect of long-term ovariectomy on bone mechanical properties in young female cynomolgus monkeys. Bone. 15(5):1994;557-561.
142. Poumarat G., Squire P. Comparison of mechanical properties of human, bovine bone and a new processed bone xenograft. Biomaterials. 14(5):1993;337-340.
143. Rho J.Y.et al. The characterization of broadband ultrasound attenuation and fractal analysis by biomechanical properties. Bone. 20(5):1997;497-504.
144. Swartz D.E.et al. Physical and mechanical properties of calf lumbosacral trabecular bone. J Biomech. 24(11):1991;1059-1068.
145. Vahey J.W., Lewis J.L., Vanderby R. Jr. Elastic moduli, yield stress, and ultimate stress of cancellous bone in the canine proximal femur. J Biomech. 20(1):1987;29-33.
146. Kang Q, Ank YH, Friedman RJ. The mechanical properties and bone densities of canine cancellous bone. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1998; 9.
147. Kaneps A.J., Stover S.M., Lane N.E. Changes in canine cortical and cancellous bone mechanical properties following immobilization and remobilization with exercise. Bone. 21(5):1997;419-423.
148. Acito A.J.et al. Effects of intermittent administration of pamidronate on the mechanical properties of canine cortical and trabecular bone. J Orthop Res. 12(5):1994;742-746.
149. An YH, Kang Q, Friedman RJ. The mechanical properties and bone densities of goat cancellous bones. unpublished data, 1998.
150. Geusens P.et al. Effect of salmon calcitonin on femoral bone quality in adult ovariectomized ewes. Calcif Tissue Int. 59(4):1996;315-320.
151. Mitton D.et al. The effects of density and test conditions on measured compression and shear strength of cancellous bone from the lumbar vertebrae of ewes. Med Eng Phys. 19(5):1997;464-474.
152. Ko CC, Douglas WH, Cheng YS. Intrinsic mechanical competence of cortical and trabecular bone measured by nanoindentation and microindentation probes. In: ASME Bioengineering Conference, BED Vol. 29, ASME Press, New York, 1995.
153. Mosekilde L., Kragstrup J., Richards A. Compressive strength, ash weight, and volume of vertebral trabecular bone in experimental fluorosis in pigs. Calcif Tissue Int. 40(6):1987;318-322.
154. Aamodt A.et al. In vivo measurements show tensile axial strain in the proximal lateral aspect of the human femur. J Orthop Res. 15(6):1997;927-931.
155. Lanyon L.E., Bourn S. The influence of mechanical function on the development and remodeling of the tibia. An experimental study in sheep. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 61(2):1979;263-273.
156. Lanyon L.E., Baggott D.G. Mechanical function as an influence on the structure and form of bone. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 58-B(4):1976;436-443.
157. O'Connor J.A., Lanyon L.E., MacFie H. The influence of strain rate on adaptive bone remodelling. J Biomech. 15(10):1982;767-781.
158. Lanyon L.E.et al. Mechanically adaptive bone remodelling. J Biomech. 15(3):1982;141-154.
159. Turner A.S., Mills E.J., Gabel A.A. In vivo measurement of bone strain in the horse. Am J Vet Res. 36(11):1975;1573-1579.
160. Manley P.A., Schatzker J., Sumner-Smith G. Evaluation of tension and compression forces in the canine femur in vivo. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 99(3):1982;213-216.
161. Szivek J.A., Johnson E.M., Magee F.P. In vivo strain analysis of the greyhound femoral diaphysis. J Invest Surg. 5(2):1992;91-108.
162. Biewener A.A., Taylor C.R. Bone strain. a determinant of gait and speed? J Exp Biol. 123:1986;383-400.
163. Demes B.et al. Patterns of strain in the macaque ulna during functional activity. Am J Phys Anthropol. 106(1):1998;87-100.
164. Hylander W.L., Johnson K.R., Crompton A.W. Loading patterns and jaw movements during mastication in Macaca fascicularis. a bone-strain, electromyographic, and cineradiographic analysis Am J Phys Anthropol. 72(3):1987;287-314.
165. Swartz S.M., Bertram J.E., Biewener A.A. Telemetered in vivo strain analysis of locomotor mechanics of brachiating gibbons. Nature. 342(6247):1989;270-272.
166. Weijs W.A., de Jongh H.J. Strain in mandibular alveolar bone during mastication in the rabbit. Arch Oral Biol. 22(12):1977;667-675.
167. Keller T.S., Spengler D.M. Regulation of bone stress and strain in the immature and mature rat femur. J Biomech. 22(11-12):1989;1115-1127.
168. Mosley J.R.et al. Strain magnitude related changes in whole bone architecture in growing rats. Bone. 20(3):1997;191-198.
169. Goodship A.E., Lanyon L.E., McFie H. Functional adaptation of bone to increased stress. An experimental study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 61(4):1979;539-546.
170. Lanyon L.E., Rubin C.T. Static vs dynamic loads as an influence on bone remodelling. J Biomech. 17(12):1984;897-905.
171. Fritton S.P., McLeod K.J., Rubin C.T. Quantifying the strain history of bone. spatial uniformity and self-similarity of low-magnitude strains J Biomech. 33(3):2000;317-325.
172. Biewener A.A., Bertram J.E. Structural response of growing bone to exercise and disuse. J Appl Physiol. 76(2):1994;946-955.