Systematic and random errors in compression testing of trabecular bone

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 101-110

  Keaveny, T M ^a   Pinilla, T P ^a   Crawford, R P ^a   Kopperdahl, D L ^a   Lou, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCULATIONS; COMPRESSION TESTING; ERRORS; NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION; ORTHOPEDICS;

END ARTIFACTS; PLATENS COMPRESSION TEST; TRABECULAR BONE;

BONE;

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; ERROR; LABORATORY TEST; MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TECHNIQUE; TRABECULAR BONE;

EID: 0031039667     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100150115     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. 1 Allard RN, Ashman RB: A comparison between cancellous bone compressive moduli determined from surface strain and total specimen deflection. Trans Orthop Res Soc 16: 51, 1991
2. 2 Ashman RB, Corin JD, Turner CH: Elastic properties of Can Cellous bone: measurement by an ultrasonic technique. J Biomech 20: 979–986, 1987
3. 3 Cheal EJ, Spector M, Hayes WC: Role of loads and prosthesis material properties on the mechanics of the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 10: 405–422, 1992
4. 4 Faulkner KG, Cann CE, Hasegawa BH: Effect of bone distribution on vertebral strength: assessment with patient–specific nonlinear finite element analysis Radiology 179: 669–674, 1991
5. 5 Fyhrie DP, Hamid Ms: The probability distribution of trabecular level strains for vertebral cancellous bone. Trans Orthop Res Soc 18: 175, 1993
6. 6 Goulet RW, Goldstein SA, Ciarelli MJ, Kuhn JL, Brown MB, Feldkamp LA: The relationship between the structural an orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. J Biomech 27: 375–389, 1994
7. 7 Hodgskinson R, Currey Jd: The effect of variation in structure on the young's modulus of cancellous bone: a comparison of human and non‐human material. Proc Inst Mech Eng (H) 204: 115–121, 1990
8. 8 Hollister SJ, Brennan JM, Kikuchi N: A homogenization sampling procedure for calculating trabecular bone effective stiffness and tissue level stress. J Biomech 27: 433–444, 1994
9. 9 Keaveny TM, Borchers RE, Gibson LJ, Hayes WC: Theoretical analysis of the experimental artifact in treabecular bone modulus. J Biomech 26: 599–607, 1993
10. 10 Keaveny TM, Borchers RE, Cibson LJ, Hayes WC: Trabecular bone modulus and strength can depend on specimen geometry. J Biomech 26: 991–1000, 1993
11. 11 Keaveny TM, Cuo XE, Wachtel EF, McMahon Ta, Hayes WC: Trabecular bone exhibits fully linear elastic behavior and yields at low strains. J Biomech 27: 1127–1136, 1994
12. 12 Keaveny TM, Wachtel EF, Ford CM, Hayes Wc: Differences between the tensile and compressive strengths of bovine tibial trabecular bone depend on modulus. J Biomech 27: 1137–1146, 1994
13. 13 Keaveny TM, Bartel DL: Mechanical consequences of bone ingrowth in a hip prosthesis inserted without cement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 77: 911–923 1995
14. 14 Keyak JH, Fourkas MG, Meagher JM, Skinner HB: Validation of an automated method of three‐dimensional finite element modelling of bone. J Biomed Eng 15: 505–509, 1993
15. 15 Kopperdahl DL, Keaveny TM: Compressive and tensile elastic and failure properties of human vertebral trabecular bone. Proc Am Soc Mech Eng Bioeng Conf, BED‐vol 29, pp 357–358, 1995
16. 16 Linde F, Hvid I: The effect of constraint on the mechanical behaviour of trabecular bone specimens. J Biomech 22: 485–490, 1989
17. 17 Linde F, Hvid I, Madsen F: The effect specimen geometry on the mechanical behaviour of trabecular bone specimens. J Biomech 25: 359–368, 1992
18. 18 Lotz JC, Cheal EJ, Hayes WC: Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models Part II. Nonlinear analysis. J Biomech Eng 113: 361–365, 1991
19. 19 Odgaard A, Hvid I. Linde F: Compressive axial strain distributions in cancellous bone specimens. J Biomech 22: 829–835, 1989
20. 20 Odgaard A, Linde F: The Underestimation of Young's modulus in compressive testing of cancellous bone speeimens. J Biomech 24: 691–698, 1991
21. 21 Simmons CA, Hipp JA: A new method for the mechanical testing of trabecular bone. Proc Am Soc Mech Eng Bioeng Conf, BED‐vol. 29, pp 355–356, 1995
22. 22 Skinner HB, Kim AS, Keyak JH, Mote CD Jr: Femoral Prosthesis implantation induces Changes in bone stress that depend on the extent of porous coating. J Orthop Res 12: 553–563, 1994
23. 23 van Rietbergen B, Weinans H, Huiskes R, Odgaard A: A new method to determine trabecular bone elastic properties and loading using micromechanical finite‐element models. J Biomech 28: 69–81, 1995
24. 24 Zhu M, Keller TS, Spengler DM: Effects of specimen loadbearing and free surface layers on the compressive mechanical properties of cellular materials. J Biomech 27: 57–66, 1994