The effectiveness of electronic monitoring with violent male parolees

Justice Quarterly

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 294-312

  Finn, Mary A ^a   Muirhead Steves, Suzanne ^a  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347616407     PISSN: 07418825     EISSN: 17459109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07418820200095251     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Albonetti, C. A., & Hepburn, J. R. (1997). Probation revocation: A proportional hazards model of the conditioning effects of social disadvantage. Social Problems, 44, 124-138.
3. Allison, P. D. (1984). Event history analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1998). The psychology of criminal conduct (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
5. Baumer, E. (1997). Levels and predictors of recidivism: The Malta experience. Criminology, 35, 601-628.
6. Baumer, T. L., & Mendelsohn, R. I. (1992). Electronically monitored home confinement: Does it work? In J. M. Byrne, A. J. Lurigio, & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Smart sentencing: The emergence of intermediate sanctions (pp. 54-67). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. Beck, A. J., & Shipley, B. E. (1989). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1983 (NCJ - 116261). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
8. Beck, J., Klein-Saffran, J., & Wooten, H. B. (1990). Home confinement and the use of electronic monitoring with federal parolees. Federal Probation, 54(4), 22-33.
9. Bonta, J., Wallace-Capretta, S., & Rooney, J. (2000a). Can electronic monitoring make a difference? An evaluation of three Canadian programs. Crime and Delinquency, 46, 61-75.
10. Bonta, J., Wallace-Capretta, S., & Rooney, J. (2000b). A quasi-experimental evaluation of an intensive rehabilitation program. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 312-329.
11. Brown, M. P., & Roy, S. (1995). Manual and electronic house arrest: An evaluation of factors related to failure. In J. O. Smykla & W. L. Selke (Eds.), Intermediate sanctions: Sentencing in the 1990s (pp. 37-53). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
12. Burke, P., Adams, L., & Becki, N. (1990). Policy for parole release and revocation. Longmont, CO: National Institute of Corrections.
13. Byrne, J. M., Lurigio, A. J., & Baird, M. A. (1989). The effectiveness of the new intensive supervision programs. In J. Petersilia (Ed.), Research in corrections, 2(2), pp.1-48. Boulder, CO: National Institute of Corrections.
14. Cadigan, T. P. (1991). Electronic monitoring in federal pre-trial release. Federal Probation, 55, 31-33.
15. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
16. Charles, M. T. (1989a). The development of a juvenile electronic monitoring program. Federal Probation, 53, 3-12.
17. Charles, M. T. (1989b). Electronic monitoring for juveniles. Journal of Crime and Justice, 12, 147-169.
18. Chung, C. F., Schmidt, P., & Witte, A. D. (1991). Survival analysis: A survey. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 7, 59-98.
19. Clarkson, J. S., & Weakland, J. J. (1991). A transitional aftercare model for juveniles: Adapting electronic monitoring and home confinement. Journal of Offender Monitoring, 4, 1-15.
20. Clear, T. (1994). Harm in American penology: Offenders, victims and their communities. Albany: State University of New York Press.
21. Clear, T., & Braga, A. A. (1998). Challenges for corrections in the community. In J. Petersilia (Ed.), Community corrections: Probation, parole and intermediate sanctions (pp. 213-218). New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Cooprider, K. W., & Kerby, J. (1990). A practical application of electronic monitoring at the pretrial stage. Federal Probation, 54, 28-35.
23. Courtright, K. E., Berg, B. L., & Mutchnick, R. J. (1997). The cost effectiveness of using house arrest with electronic monitoring for drunk drivers. Federal Probation, 61, 19-22.
24. Courtright, K. E., Berg, B. L., & Mutchnick, R. J. (2000). Rehabilitation in the new machine? Exploring drug and alcohol use and variables related to success among DUI offenders under electronic monitoring—Some preliminary outcomes. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44, 293-311.
25. Davis, F., & Lockman, P. T. (1995). An alternative to incarceration: Juvenile home detention and electronic monitoring. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 23, 8589.
26. Davis, P. (2001, April 12). Shiffletts want Va. held accountable in son’s slaying: State failed to treat, monitor suspect, they say in claim. Washington Post, p. Bl.
27. DeJong, C. (1997). Survival analysis and specific deterrence: Integrating theoretical and empirical models of recidivism. Criminology, 35, 561-575.
28. Dilulio, J. (1997). Reinventing parole and probation. Brookings Review, 25(2), 40-42.
29. Dodgson, K, & Mortimer, E. (2000). Home detention: The first year of operation (Home Office Research Findings No. 110). London: Home Office.
30. Eiserer, T. (1998). Parolee one of few under special supervision program. In Abilene Reporter-News [On-line], Available: http://www.reporternews.com/local/parole 0621.html
31. Electronic tagging experiment successful [On-line]. (1999, February 2). Available: http://www.minjust.nl:8080/c_actual/persber/pbll78.htm
32. Elrod, P., & Brown, M. P. (1996). Predicting public support for electronic house arrest: Results from a New York county survey. American Behavioral Scientist, 39, 461-468.
33. Enos, R., Holman, J. E., & Carroll, M. E. (1999). Alternative sentencing: Electronically monitored correctional supervision (2nd ed.). Bristol, IN: Wyndham Hall Press.
34. Erwin, B. S. (1989). IPS with electronic monitoring option, Atlanta: Georgia Department of Corrections.
35. Gainey, R. R., Payne, B. K., & O’Toole, M. (2000). The relationship between time in jail, time on electronic monitoring, and recidivism: An event history analysis of a jail-based program. Justice Quarterly, 17, 733-752.
36. Greenfield, L. A. (1997). Sex offenses and offenders: An analysis of data on rape and sexual assault (NCJ -163392). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
37. Gross, M. (1992). Electronic monitoring systems (EMS) in the pre-trial environment: Constitutionality, cost-effectiveness and other factors. Miami, FL: Metro-Dade Department of Justice Assistance.
38. Hofer, P. J., & Meierhoefer, B. S. (1987). Home confinement: An evolving sanction in the federal criminal justice system. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.
39. Hoffinan, P. B. (1983). Screening for risk: A revised Salient Factor Score (SFS 81). Journal of Criminal Justice, 11, 539-547.
40. Larivee, J. J, (1993). Community programs—A risky business. Corrections Today, 55(6), 20-26.
41. Lilly, R. J. (1995). Electronic monitoring in the U.S. In M. Tonry & K. Hamilton (Eds.), Intermediate sanctions in overcrowded times (pp. 112-115). Boston: Northeastern University Press.
42. Lilly, R. J., Ball, R. A., Curry, G. D., & McMullen, J. (1993). Electronic monitoring of the drunk driver: A seven-year study of the home confinement alternative. Crime & Delinquency, 39, 462-484.
43. Lilly, R. J., Ball, R. A., Curry, G. D., & Smith, R. C. (1992). The Pride, Inc., Program: An evaluation of 5 years of electronic monitoring. Federal Probation, 56, 42-47.
44. LIS, Inc., & U.S. Department of Justice. (1995). Technology issues in corrections agencies: Results of a 1995 survey. Longmont, CO: National Institute of Corrections Information Center.
45. MacKenzie, D. L. (1991). The parole performance of offenders released from shock incarceration (boot camp prisons): A survival time analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 7, 213-236.
46. Maltz, M. (1984). Recidivism. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
47. Maxfield, M. G., & Baumer, T. L. (1990). Home detention with electronic monitoring: Comparing pre-trial and post-conviction programs. Crime & Delinquency, 36, 521-536.
48. Maxfield, M. G. & Baumer, T. L. (1992). Juvenile electronic monitoring: Assessment report. Evaluation Review, 16, 315-332.
49. McGargle, B. (1997). GEO INFO: Satellite tracking for house arrest [On-line], Available: http://www.govtech.net/magazine/gt/1997/may/mayl997-geoinfo/mayl997-geoinfo.phtml
50. Montes, M. (1996). Technological advances in parole supervision. Corrections Today, 58, 88-91.
51. Morris, N., & Tonry, M. (1990). Between prison and probation: Intermediate punishment in a rational sentencing system. New York: Oxford University Press.
52. Palumbo, D. J., Clifford, M., & Snyder-Joy, Z. K. (1992). From net widening to intermediate sanctions: The transformation of alternatives to incarceration from benevolence to malevolence. In J. M. Byrne, A. J. Lurigio, & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Smart sentencing: The emergence of intermediate sanctions (pp. 229-244). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
53. Petersilia, J. (1998). Community corrections: Probation, parole and intermediate sanctions. New York: Oxford University Press.
54. PHDAmeriteeh. 1999. About our technology, [on-line] Available: http://homeconfinement.com/technology.htm
55. Pritchard, D. A. (1979). Stable predictors of recidivism: A summary. Criminology, 17, 15-21.
56. Raider, M. C. (1994). Juvenile electronic monitoring: A community based program to augment residential treatment. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 12, 37-48.
57. Roy, S. (1994). Electronic monitoring of juvenile offenders in Lake County, Indiana: An exploratory study. Journal of Offender Monitoring, 7, 1-8.
58. Roy, S. (1997). Five years of electronic monitoring of adults and juveniles in Lake County, Indiana: A comparative study of factors related to failure. Journal of Crime and Justice, 20, 141-160.
59. Schmidt, A. K. (1986). Electronic monitors. Federal Probation, 50, 56-59.
60. Schmidt, A. K. (1989). Electronic monitoring of offenders increases. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
61. Schmidt, P., & Witte, A. (1988). Predicting recidivism using survival models. New York: Springer-Verlag.
62. Seglem, L. (1992). Beyond bucks and bars. State Legislatures, 18, 14-18.
63. Sharp, D. (1997, September 3). Slipping off electronic shackles. USA Today, p. A4.2.
64. State Board of Pardons and Paroles. (2000). Chapter 5 electronic monitoring field operations manual. Atlanta, GA: Author.
65. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
66. Tonry, M. (1998a). Evaluating intermediate sanction programs. In J. Petersilia (Ed.), Community corrections; Probation, parole and intermediate sanctions (pp. 79-96). New York: Oxford University Press.
67. Tonry, M. (1998b). Intermediate sanctions. In M. Tonry (Ed.), The handbook of crime and punishment (pp. 683-711). New York: Oxford University Press.
68. U.S. Department of Justice. (1997). Correctional populations in the U.S., 1995 (NCJ 163926). Washington, DC: Author.
69. Whitfield, D. (1997). Tackling the tag: The electronic monitoring of offenders. Winchester, England: Waterside Press.
70. Whitlock, C. (1999, October 1). MD home-detention violations high; Reports under new state law show defendants missing 360 times in July. Washington Post, p. A01.
71. Zamble, E., & Quinsey, V. (1997). The criminal recidivism process. Oxford, England: Cambridge University Press.