Predicting public support for electronic house arrest: Results from a new york county survey

American Behavioral Scientist

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 451-473

  Elrod, Preston ^a   Brown, Michael P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039930757     PISSN: 00027642     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aldrich, J., & Nelson, F. (1984). Linear probability, logit, and probit models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2. Austin, J., & Hardyman, P. (1991). The use of early parole with electronic monitoring to control prison crowding: Evaluation of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections pre-parole supervised release with electronic monitoring. Unpublished report.
3. Ball, R., Huff, C. R., & Lilly, J. R. (1988). House arrest and correctional policy: Doing time at home. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4. Brown, M. P., & Elrod, P. (1995). Electronic house arrest: An examination of citizen attitudes. Crime and Delinquency, 41, 332-346.
5. Clear, T. (1995). Ophelia the CCW: May 11, 2010. In J. Klofas & S. Stojkovic (Eds.), Crime and justice in the year 2010 (pp. 205-223). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
6. Collins, W. C. (1987). Court watch. Offender Monitoring, 1, 2-3.
7. Corbett, R., & Marx, G. T. (1991). Critique: No soul in the new machine: Technofalacies in the electronic monitoring movement. Justice Quarterly, 8, 399-414.
8. Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: John Wiley.
9. Durham, A. M., III. (1994). Crisis and reform: Current issues in American punishment. Boston: Little, Brown.
10. Ford, D., & Schmidt, A. K. (1985). Electronically monitored home confinement. NIJ Reports, 194 (November), 2-6.
11. Friday, P. C., & Brown, M. (1994, April). The politics of community corrections. Overcrowded Times, pp. 8, 18.
12. Glaser, D., & Watts, R. (1992). Electronic monitoring of drug offenders on probation. Judicature, 76, 112-117.
13. Gottfredson, S. D., & Taylor, R. B. (1983). The correctional crisis: Prison population and public policy. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
14. Gottfredson, S. D., Warner, B. D., & Taylor, R. B. (1988). Conflict and consensus about criminal justice in Maryland. In N. Walker & M. Hough (Eds.), Public attitudes to sentencing (pp. 17-55). Aldershot, England: Gower.
15. Grinter, R. C. (1989). Electronic monitoring of serious offenders in Texas. Journal of Offender Monitoring, 2, 1-14.
16. Gross, M. (1990). Serving time behind the front door: Electronic monitoring programs provide prison alternatives. Corrections Today, 52, 80.
17. McShane, M., & Krause, W. (1993). Community corrections. New York: Macmillan.
18. Petersilia, J. (1987). Expanding options for criminal sentencing. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
19. Renzema, M., & Skelton, D. (1990). Use of electronic monitoring in the United States: 1989 update. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
20. Tonry, M., & Will, R. (1990). Intermediate sanctions. Unpublished report.
21. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1994). County and city data book: 1994. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
22. U.S. Department of Justice. (1990). A survey of intermediate sanctions. Washington, DC: Author.
23. Williams, J. S., Johnson, D. M., & McGrath, J. H. (1991). Is the public committed to the imprisonment of convicted felons? Citizen preferences for reducing prison overcrowding. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 7, 88-94.